HariPrasad
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2013
- Messages
- 14,055
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
CCP text book? what's that? your post is perfectly in line of idiotic comment, I also enjoy such you kind of indian idiotic comments, you know, can't build simple good builet, have to importing rifle, gun, blow up its submarine in yourself port, can't update submarine after about 20 years operation of submarine, most weapon are imported country, you as one indian from such loser country, come here discussing with Chinese in technology? and seems you are expert, mocking chinese, that's very hilarious.
Your comments is so idiotic, you can't understand it.
Your way of writing tells us a lot about your education. You are talking about Chinese technology? Which Chinese technology? one which used in J 15 or the one used in J31? I hope you got the point.
LCA can fly from Carrier?
Oh my dear!!!!!!!!! you innocence made me cry once again. The plane which took off from career are different from the planes used by air force. Naval version of Tejas will fly from career.
So LCA is better than JF 17 and J10? 1st generation aircraft need less time do this, so LCA is worse than that?
There are lots of videos on net. Forget about completing it before Tejas. Just post a video in which both plane completes 360* vertical loop. remember 360* and not 270-280*.
lighter and smaller than 1st generation aircrate? bird have lower RCS than LCA
You exposed yourself once again. You proved that you are not fit for technical discussion but good in trolling.
Really, So What? better than F22?
Your poor knowledge is on exhibition once again. F22 carries much more load than 3.5 tons and take off in much less time.
Sorry I am not a chinese. so I won't say that it is batter than F22. Even I would not say that it is batter than Mirage 2000. Batter than F22 , Su 35 PAKFA etc. is reserved for china. All chinese planes are Batter than the best. Such as 2 tons payload capacity J 15 is batter than Su 33 and 35, J 20 with so much aerodynamic flaws is a F22 killers etc,etc.
Add this, it spend your impotent scientist more than 30 years, and even be commissioned, also because of political fators.
your writing skills have reached to a level beyond understandable
Is these your fruit of education? suck.
Discuss on LCA? Wasting my time, More than 30 years, most of core sub-system and conponent are imported or with foreign company help, this is so-called indian indigenous aircraft, you don't know it is big joke in aircraft industry.
See, you are doing injustice to yourself and me. Just few minutes ago you ask me to educate you on Tejas. Now you say that you do not want to west you time. Why such a big confusion? Here the proper education comes in my dear. Any multinational company (Except Chinese) will fail you in psychometric test.
.
Basic layout can be improved partly, why can't? the article also not say it will change the basic layout completely, why can't change engine? F16 have been equiped with many kind of engines.
Chinese Expert contradicts Indian expert.
Last edited: