antonius1233181299 said:
No it is your assumption--knucklehead. You are the one under the impression that Russia wants DSI by asking why they have not incorporated it.
antonius1233181299 said:
As I said because you have no clue about DSI but thinking as if you knew.
More like you don’t know, I find it utterly sad that you still think a cone intake, half cone, and DSI are different apart from the shape.
antonius1233181299 said:
As usual your talking is demonstrating your clueless about the topic you intend to debate.
The size matters. Manufacturing small single canopy require small mold; while big 1 piece canopy like that of J-20/F-22 require huge mold. And the huge piece/mold require more complicated technology.
You cannot distinguish the size, as you cannot distinguish the shape (remember you cant distinguish curvature vs round, and cone / ovoid vs cylinder)
Where are you getting at? All I see is a whole lot of ranting, much of the time unrelated. Stop diverting from the subject by spouting a bunch of incoherent crap. And yes I know the difference between curvature and something that is round, you are just too brain dead to know what a contour is, as in contour of a circle.
antonius1233181299 said:
Your claim that Mirage already use DSI just because they share some similarity - more demonstrating your clueless and idiocy.
My claim? Your source busts your nonsense out of the water. The Main purpose of the DSI is to slow airflow down to subsonic speed before it enters the intake. Similarly, a cone intake or half cone is built for the same purpose, so the only clueless idiot is you.
I know the response that will come from you; deny, deny, call me an idiot, twist the subject and make some unsubstantiated claims, tell me I don’t understand, call me an idiot again and than change the subject.
antonius1233181299 said:
The same type of intake doesnt mean the intake of Mirage meets the requirement to be DSI, if the intake doesnt have the feature of DSI.
You should read and learn again:
More like you should read again before you get publicly embarrassed via your own sources. A cone intake or half cone does not need the curved features of the DSI, a half cone or cone intake have their own features but all three intakes do the same job.
antonius1233181299 said:
It consists of a "bump" and a forward-swept inlet cowl, which work together to divert boundary layer airflow away from the aircraft's engine while compressing the air to slow it down from supersonic speed. The DSI can be used to replace conventional methods of controlling supersonic and boundary layer airflow, such as the intake ramp and inlet cone, which are more complex, heavy and expensive
Diverterless supersonic inlet - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You don’t say,
thanks for stating the obvious genius.
We all know that a DSI intake consists of a bump, what is your point? To me it sounds like you are dragging in a bunch of irrelevant crap in order to stay relevant. It’s clear you have nothing, you’re on empty and you are desperate. You should also bring up an article stating wheels are round too.
antonius1233181299 said:
CONE has NO bump and a forward-swept inlet cowl, which work together to divert boundary layer airflow away from the aircraft's engine while compressing the air to slow it down from supersonic speed.
Those things which are unavailable on Mirage/Mig21 air intake - which create DSI and give high performance, high total pressure recovery, low integrated distortion and good engine/intake matching
Really? You are a miserable liar.
Inlet cone - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The main purpose of an inlet cone is to slow the flow of air from supersonic flight speed to a subsonic speed before it enters the engine.
---The boundary layer on the cone is stretched as it moves up the cone---
Owned
antonius1233181299 said:
It is you who dont know the meaning and have no clue about that sentence.
If you have a brain even if a little, you should realize that JF-17II and F-35 wont use DSI if the performance is the same as Mirage/Mig 21 style CONE
Answer the question, self proclaimed expert. Funny how you accuse people of dragging in articals without explaining them yet you quote something and tell everyone to ‘check it out’ with out any explanation, and now someone asks you explain your quote and you outright avioid it. It's clear you don't know what the hell your talking about.
So now again, explain what:
‘high total pressure recovery, low integrated distortion and good engine/intake matching’ means.
Afterall you quoted it.