ptldM3
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2009
- Messages
- 5,586
- Reaction score
- 19
- Country
- Location
3. JSF has bumps along its entire bottom. There is also a large protrusion above the left airduct for the cannon on the F-35A, which makes it less stealthy.
And the J-20 also has bumps as well as an array of corner reflectors, and sorry just because you say that the F-35 is less stealthy does not make it so. Reality is that companies spent large sums of money testing aircraft in anechoic chambers, as well as scrutinizing their designs by CAD programs. And this is before a team of engineers, designers, scientists, ect lay out the design and carefully choose, design, and redesign a final product that will be built with rcs reduction in mind.
4. JSF uses cheaper materials, which compromise stealth.
Post a source.
6. JSF lacks internal side weapon bays.
And that makes it inferior how?
7. The JSF is significantly smaller in physical size and can only carry a much smaller radar with less T/R (transmit/receive) modules. Since it has only one engine, the available power to the radar is also significantly less.
And what makes you think that even if the F-35 caries less T/R modules that it will be inferior? You don’t know jack about radars, stop spreading misinformation. If it was as easy as throwing a bunch of T/R models together than radar engineers would not spend years designing their radars and years testing them.
The JSF radar is clearly inferior to the F-22 and a J-20 equipped with AESA radar.
Where is the proof?
In conclusion, the JSF is no match for the J-20. The battle plan is for the F-22 to engage the J-20.
No match? ECM, weapons, data-link, training, and in general all systems working as one determines who wins.
Sensor fusion doesn't mean much when the J-20 has a larger radar and greater detection range than the F-35. Furthermore, the J-20 has a cleaner design and is stealthier than the F-35. Sending a F-35 against the J-20 is unwise.
Detecting an aircraft does not mean much, achieving and holding a lock is another story.. And even if we give you the benefit of the doubt, and say that the J-20’s radar, a radar that we know nothing about, can detect the F-35 before the F-35 can detect the J-20. We know that it does not translate to achieving a lock or even being within firing range.
----------
Latest J-20 "2002" Mighty Dragon photographs
Notice the gold transparent RAM on the J-20 cockpit canopy. Only China and the U.S. have this advanced material science technology.
No, we don’t notice a gold transparent ‘RAM’ canopy, because there is nothing even remotely gold to it. And I’m sorry but the technology doesn’t have anything to do with RAM, guess why the A-6 had a gold canopy?
F-35 does not know what type of radar J20 is going to use, J20 knows what F35 is using and will export. how do you and how can you jam something you dont know?
And how does the J-20 know what type of radar the F-35 has besides knowing the basic facts such as it’s an X band AESA, which the J-20 is also.
J
J-20 was develop/introduced 20 later, it has clear rivals --- F22 and F35(possible T50, but T50 is only 3.9G,
I didn’t know the Russian managed to take the latest flanker which is widely regarded as a 4.5 aircraft and make a crappier version. But 3.9? I was thinking more like 4.206245. The Chinese still use or have very recently used Russian technology in their aircraft, whether its hiring a Russian company to develop a seeker, or hiring a Russian company to help develop a radar, or just plainly importing engines and such, the point is that it’s pretty silly to listen to Chinese chest thumping when clearly China still is behind in a number of areas. Having a black jet does not automatically mean it’s futuristic.
not true stealthy). J20 has more advance/newer electronic.
Why don’t you provide a source?
J20 is the only one to be "first find, first kill" killing machine.
J-20 fan boys never disappoint when it comes to chest thumping. ‘killing machine’, ‘devastating’, ‘might dragon’.
I see the other way around, J20 will jam F35 since J20 is more powerful than F35.
I hear this a lot coming from the J-20 crew. What do you mean by ‘more powerful’? You don’t know a thing about the J-20 to make such claims. And explain exactly how the J-20 will jam the F-35, what type of jamming will it use? And please explain to everyone how you get your hands on the F-35 to know about it’s electronic counter measures.
If F35 tries to jam J20, j20 will fire missile and take it down since F20 will see further and can kill longer distance.
These silly scenarios can work both ways.
And what if F-35 does jam? What if the J-20 is out of missile range, what if the J-20 is within range but can not achieve a lock? What if the J-20 can achieve a lock but the missiles have a poor hit rate?
And how do you know that the J-20 will see further?