Chengdu J-10 Multirole Fighter Air Craft News & Discussions

[星海军事]

AL-31FN

WS-10 has been tested on J-10, but no production model is equipped with it so far.

Uh-uh, Deino is right.

 

[Akasa]

Uh-uh, Deino is right.

Any information on the purported "J-10D", like, what stage of development it is in?

 

[星海军事]

Any information on the purported "J-10D", like, what stage of development it is in?

The only information we have now is it can be almost confirmed that there will be J-10D

 

[帅的一匹]

The only information we have now is it can be almost confirmed that there will be J-10D

Conformal tanks?

 

[星海军事]

Conformal tanks?

No news on CFTs

 

[S10]

Uh-uh, Deino is right.

Source?

 

[volatile]

Chinese aircraft are being underestimated in the world just because the do not publicize their technology much. This picture is with the PL-12. The new J-10B is capable of carrying PL-15 Long-Range Air/Air Missiles. With an AESA radar and PL-15 with range of 150-180 km. This aircraft can challenge the newer 4++ generation aircraft of the world.

 

[Deino]

Chinese aircraft are being underestimated in the world just because the do not publicize their technology much. This picture is with the PL-12. The new J-10B is capable of carrying PL-15 Long-Range Air/Air Missiles. With an AESA radar and PL-15 with range of 150-180 km. This aircraft can challenge the newer 4++ generation aircraft of the world.

Sorry, but is neither the PL-15 nor even the PL-12 .. is plain in simple a very bad Photoshop fake made by using an old J-10A carrying even older PL-11s ....

The J-10A simply can't carry AAMs on the intake pylons or on the rear stations.

Deino

 

[volatile]

Sorry, but is neither the PL-15 nor even the PL-12 .. is plain in simple a very bad Photoshop fake made by using an old J-10A carrying even older PL-11s ....

The J-10A simply can't carry AAMs on the intake pylons or on the rear stations.

Deino

I took this pic from strategic journal page ,Any ways if you say this is PS it might be ,but doubt about capability has ended b statments and integration of some superior weapons on J10B/C

 

[Deino]

I took this pic from strategic journal page ,Any ways if you say this is PS it might be ,but doubt about capability has ended b statments and integration of some superior weapons on J10B/C

The problem is simply that - regardless the source - it is a ps'ed image and even if You are correct that news systems and weapons were integrated esp. with the B/C-models, the J-10 still cannot carry AAMs on the intake- and rear-fuselage stations.

Deino

 

[grey boy 2]

IS this reliable data of J-10B,C?

 

[Ali Zadi]

That seems interesting but what is the S in the J-10B/S also is there any other source to collaborate the data?

 

[Deino]

That seems interesting but what is the S in the J-10B/S also is there any other source to collaborate the data?

J-10S are the regular early-model trainers ...

 

[Ali Zadi]

J-10S are the regular early-model trainers ...

Thank you for clearing that up but do they represent the use of the same avionics and engine as the 10B?

 

[Ultima Thule]

I took this pic from strategic journal page ,Any ways if you say this is PS it might be ,but doubt about capability has ended b statments and integration of some superior weapons on J10B/C

but @Deino is right its is not even J-10b, its simply J-10a, if this is J-10b where is DSI?