Judge
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2014
- Messages
- 1,394
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
The difference between the example you gave and the example I gave is that- while in doing the example you gave, you hurt no one else, you affect no one else. You do these acts for your own spiritual satisfaction.1. You want me to be blunt, I cannot be. Take prayers for an example. I do not understand why it is compulsory for Muslims to pray 5 times a day, every day while the Christians and Jews have to go to Church only once or twice every week. But although it may not make sense to me, does it mean there is no sense to it? All it means is that my level of understanding or intelligence is not there 'yet'.
2. Correct. Because divine law cannot be contradictory to human rights. It is meant to protect them.
Whereas, in doing the example I gave - ie killing someone because he/she wants to leave Islam, your actions and faith is affecting someone else - another human being, in the worst possible manner.
Therefore it only takes a little amount of common sense to know when your actions are contravening human rights and when your actions are crossing that and hurting them.
While in praying - whether or not it benefits you - the loss to other humans is not established.
When you start killing those who wish to leave Islam - you are inflicting barbarity to other humans.