Centre collects revenue from south, spends on north: Andhra Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu

[protest]

BJP won MP seat from AP...
In fact in 89, BJP had nearly 20% vote share in AP. People, especially kids have short memories.

Naidu is still thinking the current BJP is of Ata;'s mould. May be he realized that this is Shah's BJP where they kicked out Left from Tripura in 1 year.
You think BJP can't repeat the same in AP?

dear sir, AP politics is all about caste.
Caste rules in AP. Get few regional caste satraps on your side and see how TDP and YSR crumble.

I'll bet you Bjp will not a win single ward this time around in AP.

 

[pothead]

I'll bet you Bjp will not a win single ward this time around in AP.

Well, some one did bet a month back BJP won't win Tripura.

First pay up that bet and then we will move to AP.

In AP, all that has happened is the opening gambit, i.e, the opening steps.
Just wait for the Queen to make her moves to know the board. You will be pleasantly surprised

 

[patman]

I'll bet you Bjp will not a win single ward this time around in AP.

...

the top 3 tax contributing states are Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh/Telangana and Tamilnadu.

Maharashtra & Delhi are north India, they contribute more than any south Indian state. Your entire argument is shattered

You cant use poor as an yardstick , why is it that only the Hindi speaking states reap the benefit of South Indian states tax ?

Population & landmass

What about the NE states are they rich in comparison ?

You can fit entire 8 north east states landmass in U.P alone , UP is more populous then Pakistan

you can remain a sucker forever blinded by fake nationalism, thats your choice.

A Pakistani false flagger lecturing about nationalism

 

[manlion]

Sure it is now but one year is a life time in politics.
It took BJP less than one year to capture Tripura. Don't forget that fact.....EVER

BJP 1 year later ..

 

[randomradio]

Of course you have choice, change the policy of economic distribution. Let the centre maintain only defense and foreign affairs. Collect minimal central taxes for the same and allow states to formulate their own strategies to develop themselves. Progressive states can address their local needs better when they have the means. No more 'one size fit all' central schemes. Promote cooperative competition not subsidization. Set up annual developmental targets. States that don't live up to targets should have their developmental schemes monitored by either an independent committee or a committee from centre. Do this, things will change with in a decade. Add accountability to governance and we could be China.

And you keep saying UP being bigger population we get their market. Whats the use of the market if they remain poor. They remain so because we are assisting to their laziness. Stupidity is when we keep doing the same expecting a different result. If the present distribution continue we will be half purchasing our products to north forever.

And imo you are being way too generous where it isn't required. What we all been saying is the truth and our constitution provided us with the rights to question the wrong.

That is how it works. The center works only on stuff that only they are capable of handling. For example, you want a rail line between two or more states, the center has to fund it, that's why railways comes under the center. The same with highways, dams etc.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...er-gst-till-december/articleshow/62811431.cms
Tamil Nadu's fears over the GST have been proven to be unfounded as eight months after its roll out, GST has raked in more money for the state exchequer than the erstwhile conventional VAT-based taxation system. Data of the state commercial tax department show that the state received Rs 23,317.76 crore under GST from July to December 2017, as against Rs 19,017.87 crore under VAT during the corresponding period the previous year.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...t-panneerselvam-says/articleshow/63312421.cms
The Tamil Nadugovernment stuck to its target of lowering the fiscal deficit from 4.14% of the GSDP in 2016-17 to 2.82% in 2017-18 due to buoyancy in revenue collection after implementation of the goods and services tax, said deputy chief minister O Panneerselvam on Thursday.

And you keep saying UP being bigger population we get their market. Whats the use of the market if they remain poor. They remain so because we are assisting to their laziness.

Look at the links above and tell me it's not so.

The more the poorer states are subsidized, the greater is the impact on our states.

Kerala was under Kingdom ,except in some social reforms .There was no money here .Hdi ridiculous
Literally poverty from top to bottom.
You can check in google .
When we got independence it was around bottom 3,Kerala.We migrated to North India especially in Mumbai and they attacked us.
Then in 60s ,70s Gulf boom begun.

It was literally exodus to the ME deserts for helping families in Kerala.One generation melted in that deserts ,so we Keralites have this boasting HDI .
Neither Centre nor State gives anything .
Still relying on NRI also.

Where is the proof bro ?
This practise of funneling the money from hardworking states(both South,West) to Hindi belt is continuing around one decade .
Education very poor with a lots of cheating .Nothing on ground ,illiteracy.Ever increasing population with total unskillness,corruption.
Practical absence of rule of law .etc .
Especially Bihar,UP.
No development .If India faces a brutal gangrape case then that would be possibly from there .

Kerala's per capita was similar to the rest of India, but HDI was greater than the rest of India post independence. The HDI figures merely kept up.

Kerala got richer as tourism from the rest of India started bringing in money. The Gulf remittances came in much later.

 

[Sharky]

Wait... what do Gultis contribute except fake degrees , certificates and fake n funny job interviews ..

 

[pothead]

BJP 1 year later ..

Didn't they win 4 states just a week before?

Oh the selective amnesia of the haters...After Karnataka elections, you will pretend the result never happened too

 

[randomradio]

Didn't they win 4 states just a week before?

Oh the selective amnesia of the haters...After Karnataka elections, you will pretend the result never happened too

Taking Karnataka is extremely difficult. But I suppose Naidu is terrified of a powerful BJP in Karnataka.

Naidu wanted assurances that AP will get 90% of the funding necessary from the centre, instead of the usual 50% under special status. Jaitley assured the funding but pointed out that giving special status is not constitutionally possible. Even after the funding assurance, he's making excuses because he's afraid of the rise of BJP in the south.

Other special status states require permanent support through their life. But AP doesn't need permanent support, only until Amaravati is standing on its own feet. They don't need more than 5-10 years of special status funding to achieve that.

It's politics.

 

[kvpak]

Of course you have choice, change the policy of economic distribution. Let the centre maintain only defense and foreign affairs. Collect minimal central taxes for the same and allow states to formulate their own strategies to develop themselves. Progressive states can address their local needs better when they have the means. No more 'one size fit all' central schemes. Promote cooperative competition not subsidization. Set up annual developmental targets. States that don't live up to targets should have their developmental schemes monitored by either an independent committee or a committee from centre. Do this, things will change with in a decade. Add accountability to governance and we could be China.

And you keep saying UP being bigger population we get their market. Whats the use of the market if they remain poor. They remain so because we are assisting to their laziness. Stupidity is when we keep doing the same expecting a different result. If the present distribution continue we will be half purchasing our products to north forever.

And imo you are being way too generous where it isn't required. What we all been saying is the truth and our constitution provided us with the rights to question the wrong.

good ideas but hindi politicians will never vote for it in parliament and so will never be implemented.

I'll bet you Bjp will not a win single ward this time around in AP.

Wait for 10 more years. Hindi migrants are entering south in large numbers. They will vote or BJP or Congress en masse and BJP could capture power.

Tamil Tribune proposes that migrants should not be allowed to vote until they live in the sate with family for 10 years and pass a test in the state language. Until the 10 years, they may vote in their birth states by mail.

 

[protest]

Taking Karnataka is extremely difficult. But I suppose Naidu is terrified of a powerful BJP in Karnataka.

Naidu wanted assurances that AP will get 90% of the funding necessary from the centre, instead of the usual 50% under special status. Jaitley assured the funding but pointed out that giving special status is not constitutionally possible. Even after the funding assurance, he's making excuses because he's afraid of the rise of BJP in the south.

Other special status states require permanent support through their life. But AP doesn't need permanent support, only until Amaravati is standing on its own feet. They don't need more than 5-10 years of special status funding to achieve that.

It's politics.

You really have no idea what special status is, so i recommend you to read up before you comment. Bjp had no chance ever in AP.

...

Maharashtra & Delhi are north India, they contribute more than any south Indian state. Your entire argument is shattered



Population & landmass

You can fit entire 8 north east states landmass in U.P alone , UP is more populous then Pakistan

A Pakistani false flagger lecturing about nationalism

I thought we were talking about south, whats the point in showing a map of BJP domination in the north.

Wait... what do Gultis contribute except fake degrees , certificates and fake n funny job interviews ..

This is the same idiotic behavior we are talking about that is causing the rift.

 

[randomradio]

You really have no idea what special status is, so i recommend you to read up before you comment. Bjp had no chance ever in AP.

What do you think is special status then?

 

[itachii]

BJP won MP seat from AP...
In fact in 89, BJP had nearly 20% vote share in AP. People, especially kids have short memories.

Naidu is still thinking the current BJP is of Ata;'s mould. May be he realized that this is Shah's BJP where they kicked out Left from Tripura in 1 year.
You think BJP can't repeat the same in AP?

dear sir, AP politics is all about caste.
Caste rules in AP. Get few regional caste satraps on your side and see how TDP and YSR crumble.

That seat is because of the alliance with TDP. If you seriously think bjp can win a seat in AP on its own then there is nothing else to discuss. The caste dynamics of AP are already segregated. Reddys vote for ycp, kammas vote for TDP and kapus may vote for janasena in the next election. BJP has nothing significant that would make people wanna shift their loyalty.

The problem with you people is that you try to compare SI states with other NI states. No one cares about shah or yogi here.. Ask shah to contest an mla seat in AP I would wonder if he can even get deposits.

 

[protest]

What do you think is special status then?

Don't be lazy, search and find out yourself. In any case, the special package was announced by Jaitley in september of 2016 and even after 18 months, Jootley is still working out the modalities. He is yet to give a single penny from that package to the state. Does it really take that long to work out a solution if you were sincere. Regarding polavaram, centre released 5000 crores (1250 crores on average), but its revised DPR says its cost as 54000 crores. At this rate they'll finish polavarm in 30 years time. I don't know may be north works that way, south doesn't.

BJP as we in AP relialized is good at jumlas but rather poor on deliverables.

 

[randomradio]

Don't be lazy, search and find out yourself. In any case, the special package was announced by Jaitley in september of 2016 and even after 18 months, Jootley is still working out the modalities. He is yet to give a single penny from that package to the state. Does it really take that long to work out a solution if you were sincere. Regarding polavaram, centre released 5000 crores (1250 crores on average), but its revised DPR says its cost 54000 crores. At this rate they'll finish polavarm in 30 years time. I don't know may be north works that way, south doesn't.

BJP as we in AP relialized is good at jumlas but rather poor on deliverables.

I have already explained what special status is and the criteria to get this status.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...package-arun-jaitley/articleshow/63335659.cms

 

[protest]

I have already explained what special status is and the criteria to get this status.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...package-arun-jaitley/articleshow/63335659.cms

So BJP didn't know about the criteria when they put that promise into their manifesto.

What Jaitley is promising is 90:10 ratio when it comes to external aided schemes, but what about preference with respect to central sponsored schemes and its financing, what about industrial incentives? Why would industry come to our state if there is no added incentive. 90:10 ratio has no value to the industry. If you are really going to match special status, do so in letter and spirit but not through cherry picking.