asad71
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- May 24, 2011
- Messages
- 6,863
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Was he stingy only for his personal expenses or for his whole public?
The source may be his mindset not any reference book.
Moodi vows to convert the whole of India to Hinduism. Was there any Muslim King in the Indian history who vowed for any similar plan?
In the 'State of Hyderabad' during Nizams' regimes, there no Hindu-Muslim riots. All the dirt started up after Bharat's occupation. In the State of Hyderabad, Hindus and Muslims lived in perfect harmony.
1. The Nizam was prudent with money; not stingy as propagated by British and later Hindu media. There is no contemporary institution that has not received liberal support from him. Even the Hindu Unv, Benaras. ML and Pakistan received huge help from him. The Ottoman royals in exile were supported by him. His donations were really global for any cause. In WW II the assistance he provided to the British is unparalleled. For instance, he had procured few squadrons of Spitfires for RAF. A ruler providing free medicare and education to his subjects can hardly be graded stingy.
2. Another issue propagated to defame him are his marriages. It was the fashion at that time for rulers to marry several. He would carefully select the bride of a community/tribe for political reasons.
3. Today in Hindu India the descendants of the great Muslim families/aristocracies are subsisting practically hand to mouth. The Nizam. The family of Hyder Ali-Tipu. The family of Wazed Ali Shah. All have practically vanished. The Patuadis are somewhat afloat by adopting a kind of Din e Ilahi. And compare with the British bootlickers, the Wadyars of Mysore or other Hindu aristocracies. They are doing all fine. Wealthy and powerful. Most are available in the Indian houses of parliament. After all they are high born Hindus who reign in Delhi!!