Catherine Scott-Clark declares India- A State Sponsoring Terrorism

[Amolthebest]

Yes, but I ask you something.. Why is it ok for an Indian to say we are sponsors of terrorism... But when we say it all hell broke lose?

I think that's diplomacy. Blaming other country and pretend like a victim is necessity of diplomacy. Stronger the country stronger propaganda you make.I was talking about informal discussions on PDF.Here we are aware about hypocrisies of our own countries. Then why blame others.

 

[AbhijitSingh]

We're not talking about 9/11 or amar singh.

We're talking about foreign journalists that were killed in Kashmir, by a group that was backed by the GoI to frame Pakistan.

And who says they were killed by GOI backed groups? 2 wanna be writers?? For all you know they will also be found to be on the payroll of ISI like the infamous Dr Fai.. After all ISI is notorious in spreading disinformation about Kashmir .. Unfortunately it always gets caught out ..

 

[Sergi]

Please don't respond with emotion.. And keep Pakistan out of this... We are talking about Indian Terrorism, not Pakistani Terrorism.

Bro technically I didn't write Pakistan. Its you mentioned it. Not me.
I was elaborating the STATE sponcering terrorism. So made some points. Now what remain to check is .... Is it true in context of India ???
I don't wish to derail the topic. I just defined the activities done by the state sponcering terrorism so now we can check is it India.
I have no intentions of bringing another country in discussion

 

[MastanKhan]

This article is by someone called Raja Mujtaba.. A short bio on the author

Raja Mujtaba | Veterans Today



NUFF SAID

Mister,

What is funny about this introduction----what is the reason for the insult to the Raja Mujtaba----. And why are you still here on this board---.

 

[itaskol]

india is a big country, and there is no big countries which is saint...

 

[ILLUMINATO]

As a state India never advocated Terrorism as her foreign policy but there might be few anamolies in every state ,after all we are also human.At that point f time we were regularly being harassed by pak sponsored terrorism hence one of our overworked and tence major might have opted for out of box remedy.

 

[kumarkumar1867]

They only admit it if there is significant proof and they can no longer deny it.

These Indians simply do not believe that Hindus can commit acts of terror, they always blame Muslims for it.

Be attentive when you say or when you post sumthing. Indian constitution treats hindus & muslims equally.

But our neighbours have brought disgrace to religion by their own choice by such terrorist activities.
When ever we caught them they use religion to save their A*se to get support from fanatic muslim countries & using hindu-muslim crap in their favour.

 

[Dark Warrior]

I doubt the credibility of this report.But let's assume it is true for a moment,Even then I have no problem with what RAW and IB did as it benefitted us greatly as after all national interests come before everything else.Black arm tactics are a part of greater strategy.

 

[ILLUMINATO]

Mister,

What is funny about this introduction----what is the reason for the insult to the Raja Mujtaba----. And why are you still here on this board---.

What makes you think that it's not funny??
A Pakistani ex- armyman's views couldn't be expected to be unbiased about India.
Was that really so difficult to make out??

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

This is intelligence assessment in 1996 , when the Kashmir insurgency was ending.

Something interesting related to kidnapping of foreigners

Extra info about Harkat-ul-Ansar

Harkat ul-Ansar

 

[Tija]

wao it did not take long time before ppl start fighting here. Typical Indian just spaming here with just bullshit. Not one single post with what news is about. Just bashing. We have known it and now world will see it.

Before Mumbai attacks there were atleast 4 atempts by Indians . AMjir Sharif , Makka Masjid , Malagen bombing , Samjota express and after each attack the tried to blame Pakistan but they failed. Facts are there if Indians want to see but i guess there "love" for hindu terrorist does not allow them too

Kindly tell me who expose these act's of terror ?

 

[AbhijitSingh]

Mister,

What is funny about this introduction----what is the reason for the insult to the Raja Mujtaba----. And why are you still here on this board---.

Where did I insult the gentleman in question.. I just questioned his objectivity on the matter considering he is ex Pakistani Army...and no one from either of the 2 armies can be objective on the matter of Kashmir..

Do you differ on this??

 

[dearone4u_22]

So what Raw is planning to destroy Pakistan ...I say good going guys .....Could you just speed up a bit..i sick and tired of this ppl complaining ....Let get it over and done with it

 

[sarthak]

Read again Mister.

It's a book baldy , take a chill pill. Doesn't mean whatever written in it is correct. Even if it is true , still 99% of terrorist activities in the world are done by Pakistan.

 

[shuttler]

I bet if the world takes further step trekking into the heartland and the rebellious states of india, they can find volumes of similar kind of terrorism and brutality to be exposed. There are other places in great distress too, namely Manipur and other Red Corridor states where the people are rebellious against indian rules and also the imposition of the hardlining marshal law: AFSPA on them by india!

Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Excerpt from the wiki link:

According to the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA), in an area that is proclaimed as "disturbed", an officer of the armed forces has powers to:

Fire upon or use other kinds of force even if it causes death, against the person who is acting against law or order in the disturbed area for the maintenance of public order, after giving such due warning.

Destroy any arms dump, prepared or fortified position or shelter or training camp from which armed attacks are made by the armed volunteers or armed gangs or absconders wanted for any offence

To arrest without a warrant anyone who has committed cognizable offences or is reasonably suspected of having done so and may use force if needed for the arrest.

To enter and search any premise in order to make such arrests, or to recover any person wrongfully restrained or any arms, ammunition or explosive substances and seize it.

Stop and search any vehicle or vessel reasonably suspected to be carrying such person or weapons.

Army officers have legal immunity for their actions. There can be no prosecution, suit or any other legal proceeding against anyone acting under that law.

Nor is the government's judgment on why an area is found to be disturbed subject to judicial review.
Protection of persons acting in good faith under this Act from prosecution, suit or other legal proceedings, except with the sanction of the Central Government, in exercise of the powers conferred by this Act.