What's new

Can you really imagine any conflict between the USA and Israel? View the thread

Its almost impossible to see a us- Israel conflict for the simple reason : the shear number of Jewish votes in America. at too bloody much.

Its way more political and domestic american issue to have a strong partnership with israel than any other reason ( like strategic or loving friends). I think there wont be a conflict between us and israel but as usual us will not give any help or directhelp to israel.
And looking at the strength of israel i doubt they need any kind of -serious defense help from U.S of A.

--------------------

I request members to not respond to troll, just ignore the nonexistent one who derail these threads. You are committing bigger crime by responding to him.
 
.
wow that was a big surprise,buddy........guess i have to edit my profile in the social community sites!!! Anyways,then from your 'sources',you also have learnt bout our party and our work.......btw,edit your post,as you are passing away my personal details here...

Only if you promise me not to comment on me further directly or indirectly.

I told you not to provoke me. Do not think that I do not have connection to.... you understand, I hope.

Next time I will post your photo, if you continue disturbing me. Do your job and let me do my job.
 
.
Only if you promise me not to comment on me further directly or indirectly.

I told you not to provoke me. Do not think that I do not have connection to.... you understand, I hope.

Next time I will post your photo, if you continue disturbing me. Do your job and let me do my job.

do it.....as long as you talk foul bout my country,i shall never back away
 
.
Israel-US battle over settlement freeze

* Hillary says Washington wants stop to settlements, Liberman says Tel Aviv does not have ‘any intention to change the demographic balance’
* ElBaradei, Israel clash over Syria probe ‘bias’

WASHINGTON: US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman clashed over US demands for a freeze on settlements in Palestinian territory.

At a press conference after talks in Washington on Wednesday, Hillary reaffirmed US demands for an end to settlement building but her Israeli counterpart rejected the call.

The focus now moves to a meeting in Paris next week between a US envoy and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about his plans for peace with the Palestinians.

Hillary and Lieberman highlighted the discord after their first meeting since the right wing Netanyahu government came to office in March.

“We want to see a stop to the settlements,” Hillary told reporters as she stood next to Lieberman.

“We think that is an important and essential part of pursuing the efforts leading to a comprehensive agreement and the creation of a Palestinian next to an Israeli Jewish state that is secure in its borders and future,” she said.

On May 27, the chief US diplomat said President Barack Obama had made it clear during Netanyahu's earlier visit to Washington that he wants no “natural growth exceptions” to his call for a settlement freeze.

Lieberman insisted that would not be possible.

Israel did not have “any intention to change the demographic balance” of the West Bank, said Lieberman, head of the ultranationalist Yisrael Beitenu party, which is part of Netanyahu's Likud-led coalition government. “But we think that as in any place, babies are born, people get married, some pass away and we cannot accept this vision about an absolutely complete freezing of settlements,” said Lieberman. “I think that we must keep the natural growth,” he said.

“This approach is very clear and also we had some understandings with the previous administration (of George W Bush) and we try to keep this direction,” he said.

Hillary disagreed.

“In looking at the history of the Bush administration, there were no informal or oral enforceable agreements,” she said, repeating earlier statements.

Lieberman reiterated calls for immediate, direct talks with the Palestinian Authority led by Mahmud Abbas, which has rejected the Netanyahu government's policy toward them.

After months of US pressure, Netanyahu on Sunday endorsed a two-state solution for the first time. Separate Israeli and Palestinian states have been cornerstone of international Middle East peacemaking efforts for years.

But he set a slew of conditions: Palestinian recognition of Israel as a Jewish state; any Palestinian state must be demilitarised and will not control its air space or be able to forge military pacts. Netanyahu demanded “ironclad” security guarantees for Israel.

The Obama administration announced meanwhile that George Mitchell, the special envoy for Middle East peace, will travel on June 25 to Paris for talks with Netanyahu.

“It would be the first opportunity for Senator Mitchell to follow up with the prime minister in the aftermath of his speech,” Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs Philip Crowley told reporters.

ElBaradei, Israel clash: Meanwhile, the UN nuclear watchdog chief on Thursday angrily rejected Israeli accusations of bias in a probe by his agency into allegations of a secret Syrian atomic site, calling Israel's position “totally distorted”.

The International Atomic Energy Agency has been examining US intelligence reports saying Syria almost completed a reactor that could have yielded plutonium for atom bombs, before Israel bombed it to pieces in 2007. IAEA head Mohamed ElBaradei has chided Syria for withholding documentation and access for inspectors seeking to clarify the allegations. But he has also rebuked Israel for not alerting the UN watchdog before destroying the site, complicating the search to establish the truth. Tensions boiled at a meeting of the IAEA's governing body in Vienna when Israel's envoy accused ElBaradei of making “redundant” demands and showing bias by making repeated calls on Israel to provide more evidence.

“… Israel calls on (ElBaradei) to avoid political bias in dealing with the Syrian file,” Ambassador Israel Michaeli told the 35-nation governing board during a debate on the Syria issue.

ElBaradei, in a caustic rebuttal unusual in the diplomatic body, called Michaeli's statement “totally distorted”. agencies
Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
 
.
there wont be any such war. and i dont want it either. it will serve no one. US for the first time is taking an honest stand and whether they succeed or not i will always appreciate their effort.
though this doesnt mean im gonna stop criticisin US on other things ;)
 
.
TruthSeeker
Israel already attacked the US at least once in the past when it nearly sank the USS Liberty in 1967.
Yes and both governments are still keeping much of this incident hidden from public view.
If the US wanted to sink Israel this would be a good starting point. Note it would not require any shots to be fired just a real investigation.

Stopping aid given to Israel both civil and military by the US would hammer Israel and leave it fully open to complete economic problems. Again why fire a shot.

Talking of the US and Israel having a war is meaningless as Israel can be crushed by many economic decisions by the US and there is doubt many other nations will step in to fill the void the US would leave.

Jewish interest/think tank effects are one of the US’s big internal issues. Questions on these and their directed input to aspects of US policy have in the past been questioned with little real change of policy behaviour.


FaisalAyaz
I wish that USA and Israel have war...
shravan
I wish Iran attacks Israel with WMD's

If you two numnuts really love war that much go join you respective armies and make sure you get shoved into the front line ASAP. Make sure it in the sectors with the highest level of brutality and degradation of human life.


My gosh!! I am gonna report this to the Mossad boss... :smokin:

Israel will do the same to India... my only wish in my life...

No way... Mossad is superior to CIA... If there any US-Israel war takes place, US would be the loser...
Simple comment for you..
Wakey, Wakey, hand of snakey.. You will go blind doing that.. Shame:tsk:

Mossad has little time for you excellent commentary.. ditto for the CIA. Sorry.

There will be no war its all in the mind.

But it does keep the conspiracy aspect of this forum running nicely.
Good work there:enjoy:
 
.
[
FaisalAyaz
I wish that USA and Israel have war...
shravan
I wish Iran attacks Israel with WMD's

If you two numnuts really love war that much go join you respective armies and make sure you get shoved into the front line ASAP. Make sure it in the sectors with the highest level of brutality and degradation of human life.

USA will not attack Israel. Iran will not use WMD's against Israel.
---
I wish China attacks America .....:angel:
 
. . . . . .
I wish that India follows a peaceful policy.

If the conflict comes into reality, what do you think, whether India will be on the US' side or Israel's side?

Please give logic for your standpoint.
 
. .
If the conflict comes into reality, what do you think, whether India will be on the US' side or Israel's side?

Please give logic for your standpoint.

Definitely America. Because after that there would be no Israel.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom