What's new

Can the Turkey-US alliance be saved?

Pax Ottomana

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 26, 2009
Messages
1,639
Reaction score
-3
Country
Turkey
Location
Syrian Arab Republic
The U.S. needs to understand that the old Turkey is gone, the new Turkey is here to stay and it demands an equal partnership where its interests are taken into consideration!

1360


In a scene that is becoming quite familiar lately, tension between the U.S. and Turkey has flared up. A U.S. ally hanging up posters of Abdullah Öcalan, the PKK's imprisoned leader, in Raqqa has enraged Turkey. This was preceded by another crisis: The U.S.'s suspension of all non-immigrant visa applications in Turkey and Turkey's retaliation with tit-for-tat restrictions suspending visas at its embassy and consulates in the U.S.

The Turkey-U.S. alliance goes back seven decades, with Turkey serving as a staunch U.S. ally during the Cold War era. Furthermore, the alliance between the two countries extends beyond mutual relations; it is anchored in international, institutional mechanisms such as NATO and the G-20. However, to assume that these are enough to save the previously much celebrated alliance is a delusion. The recent escalation points to a deep crisis and the need to rebuild the alliance on new foundations.

It would be easy for Washington and the U.S. media to play the blame game and throw the responsibility on the shoulders of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. The list of U.S. grievances against Erdoğan is well-known by now; starting with accusations of autocratic rule and not ending with complaints that Turkey is drifting away from the U.S. and undermining its interests. Never mind the fact that the list of U.S. grievances is more dogma and misperceptions than facts and realities – the U.S. is jeopardizing its alliance with Turkey and shouldering the lion's share of responsibility for the worsening of relations.

Turkey's trust in the U.S. has been eroding for some time now and the attempted military coup in July 2016 served as a turning point. Turkey believes that behind the military coup lies the not-so-invisible hand of some U.S. circles that provided help for the coup or at the very least, were aware of it yet did nothing to warn the Turkish government. Rather than helping its ally bring those responsible for the military coup to accountability, the U.S. is sheltering them along with the perpetrator of the bloody coup, Fetullah Gülen, who resides securely in Pennsylvania.

More critical is the view in Ankara that this is not an isolated incident but rather a continuation of recent coup attempts such as the Taksim Gezi Park protest in May 2013 and the judicial coup attempt in December 2013 which ultimately aimed to illegally bring down President Erdoğan.

Turkey is also upset that the U.S. has chosen the People's Protection Units (YPG) in Syria as its partner, rather than Turkey, in fighting Daesh. Turkey rightfully regards the YPG as an extension of the PKK which has waged an on-again, off-again terror campaign in Turkey for the last 33 years, resulting in the death of around 40,000 Turkish citizens. The PKK is also considered a terrorist organization by not just Turkey but also by the U.S. and the EU.

While the U.S. may believe that the YPG is the most effective fighting force on the ground in Syria, Turkey is holding firm to its stance that there can be no talk in terms of "good terrorists vs. bad terrorists." Ankara has been arguing that all terrorism is bad whether it comes from the right or the left and that a terrorist organization can't attain any degree of legitimacy just because it is fighting Daesh. To add insult to injury, Turkey views the U.S. decision to deliver heavy arms to the Democratic Union Party (PYD) as a threat to its national security.

Many in Washington, including some members of the White House National Security Council, have directed their firepower against President Erdoğan. However, reducing the worsening in Turkish-U.S. relations to Erdoğan is a case of bad analysis. Getting rid of Erdoğan in one way or another will not breathe life into the ailing relations between the two countries. Turkey's public view of the U.S. is growing increasingly negative, according to the Pew Research Center, with 79 percent of the population viewing the U.S. unfavorably and 72 percent seeing the power and influence of the U.S. as a major threat.

In the last decade-and-a-half, Turkey has undergone a fundamental, socio-economic transformation. As a result, in the foreign policy arena, an assertive and dynamic Turkey has emerged. Turkey's foreign policy is now more independent; putting Turkey's national interest at the heart of its strategic choices. Although the old Turkey was expected to tow the line and align its foreign policy with U.S. interests, those days are long gone and the new Turkey is here to stay. This new Turkey demands an equal partnership where its interests are taken into consideration.

Today, both Turkey and the U.S. may find it easier to work with each other's adversary; with the U.S. preferring the PYD over Turkey and Turkey finding it easier to work with Russia. However, this is a lose-lose situation. It's time to turn over a new leaf and rebuild the Turkey-U.S. alliance on a new foundation; a foundation of equality and consideration in the interests of both countries.

https://www.dailysabah.com/op-ed/2017/11/06/can-the-turkey-us-alliance-be-saved
 
. .
The sooner the DC establishment relinquishes the dependence and projection with "our boys" the earlier the relationship can be restored....

*** The Turkish coup-mongers are affectionately called "our boys"!!!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
The earlier the DC establishment relinquishes the dependence and projection with "our boys" the earlier the relationship can be restored....

*** The Turkish coup-mongers are affectionately called "our boys"!!!!
Yeah, who can forget those smug amd shameless "our boys did it" statements following past coups. :nono:
 
. . .
Yes, that's true. Different countries/victims, same methods of control.

And, if I might respectfully point out, those others are also now finding out that they were better off without the Americans in the first place. It is normal for the parting to be bitter, considering the amount of undue influence that is slowly coming to light. In all these cases.
 
. .
Turkey-US relations are heading for a reset, which is a good thing. The article is right that both countries have too much to lose given the current trajectory.
 
.
Turkey ready to take action against outside ploys to create regional chaos

608


President Erdoğan issued a warning against outside powers that use non-state actors to split up countries and incite regional instability, which experts have interpreted as veiled criticism of U.S. support for the terrorist PKK's Syrian affiliate YPG

Turkey is well aware of the designs of outside powers on regional countries, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said on Friday during his address to the provincial chairmen of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party), adding that the government intended to do everything necessary to stop the use of non-state actors to destabilize the region. Experts saw the remarks as a clear censure of continued U.S. support for the YPG, the Syrian affiliate of the PKK that it recognizes as a terrorist group. Erdoğan said Turkey "is disappointed with the U.S. for not keeping its promises since the crisis in Syria broke out," adding that he "doesn't want the same thing to take place in Afrin."

"We need to be dominant at the observation points in Idlib. If not, different terrorist groups will try to invade those areas," the president said.

The Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) is planning to set up 12 observation and security points in Idlib as part of the Astana peace process while preparing to extend its operation towards PYD-held Afrin and Manbij.

As part of the current plan, Turkish troops will be deployed at strategic points in Idlib, near its border with Afrin and Manbij, to monitor the region and prevent clashes between Syrian opposition fighters and the Assad regime forces as well as outline a plan for an upcoming operation in the other two areas.

Pointing out that Turkey had urged the U.S. to clear Manbij of PKK/YPG presence, Erdoğan said: "Obama did not keep his promises, though he promised many times. The current administration, unfortunately, said they were working with the SDF, not the YPG."

"Don't try to trick us by saying that the SDF is a democratic establishment. It is [also] a terrorist organization. We know who's who," he added.

The Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) is largely dominated by the PKK-affiliated YPG.

Meanwhile, a deal was struck between Daesh and the SDF recently to allow hundreds of Daesh terrorists escape their former so-called capital Raqqa.

Evaluating the situation, Abdullah Ağar, a former military officer, and security expert, said: "It became clear how accurate Turkey's evaluation was. Reports have surfaced that the two organizations that appear to be fighting each other have cooperated and agreed to their own interests. This proves that they are nothing more than puppets,"

"Both organizations are being operated directly and asymmetrically. We saw this in Tabqa and recently in Raqqa. We also saw it in the areas that came under the Operation Euphrates Shield," Ağar said, adding that this was one of the dirtiest and bloodiest wars in human history.

"We talk about principles and righteousness, but one of the dirtiest and bloodiest wars in human history is taking place in Syria and Iraq," he said.

Muhittin Ataman of the Foundation for Political Economic and Social Research (SETA) identified non-state actors, like the YPG and the SDF, as the leading threats destabilizing the region.

"These are revisionist actors. They generally want change in the country and the region. They have their own habits. Global powers and regional states are protecting and supporting these non-state actors as a means to remain active and relevant in the Middle East," Ataman said.

Stressing that this strategy pays off because of support from major powers but furthers instability, Ataman said, "When we look at it we can easily see that the U.S., Iran, Israel and Saudi Arabia, are all using proxies in their Middle East policies."

Meanwhile, President Erdoğan during a speech in Ankara yesterday confirmed that Turkey was withdrawing 40 soldiers from a NATO drill in Norway after reports emerged that Mustafa Kemal Atatürk and Erdoğan were depicted as enemies.

"There was an incident in Norway. They used a chart where my name and [Mustafa Kemal] Atatürk's Picture was listed as enemies," Erdoğan said.

Stressing that he was informed about the issue by Chief of General Staff Gen. Hulusi Akar and EU Affairs Minister Ömer Çelik, Erdoğan said he was told, "they were withdrawing our 40 soldiers from there [Norway]."

"I told them to do it immediately. There can be no such alliance," he said.

https://www.dailysabah.com/politics...gainst-outside-ploys-to-create-regional-chaos
 
.
It is a good thing to happen in the region...Peace in middle east is possible when local countries try to talk with each other than involving outsiders who always looks for their own intrests...It is high time, regional heavyweights like Turkey, Iran and Saudi Arab should sync up with each other bring some stability in the region...
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom