kingwazzuu
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2013
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Asean has no interference policy and Asean countries tend to rule on consensus as a group. So what is the fuss of who's going to lead ?!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Recruit
We can burn ur country to the ground within one month with our ballistic missile Scud -D if we want, and u dont have any ballistic missile to fight back, wanna be a leader ??ahhaahh, cheap jokeBy taking care of your country shit for once...
We dont care who lead ASEAN we just need sub mekong regionAsean has no interference policy and Asean countries tend to rule on consensus as a group. So what is the fuss of who's going to lead ?!
Exactly, ASEAN members embrace no interference policy and tend to rule on consensus as a group. Besides, ASEAN has a rotating chairmanship and secretariat. That is fair and well-balanced. Just some clueless outsiders mean ASEAN needs a permanent leader, because in doing so, other members will give up their rights and national sovereignty.Asean has no interference policy and Asean countries tend to rule on consensus as a group. So what is the fuss of who's going to lead ?!
another delusional Chinese. If you don´t have any clue on economics and politics, you should keep silent. If Germany leaves the European Union as well as the single currency Euro, then Europe will collapse. If Indonesia leaves ASEAN, nobody notices.Sweden to EURO is what Singapore is to ASEAN. Indonesia to ASEAN is what Germany is to EURO.
If you're referring to Singapore, there is no comparison, they are a highly developed service-oriented economy. Manufacturing is limited, and only in high tech sector.
Where I'm from, we beat you flat in manufacturing.
I'm not for or against any country in ASEAN, a country with lower HDI and per capita income.... can never lead others with have a higher benchmark, it's akin to indians claiming they are next superpower when the facts and figures show otherwise.
How big is Indonesia economy now after the collapse of your currency?
Lastest figure shows the Rupiad is declining further to US$1 for Rupiad 11,833.2.
Rupiah Passes Rupee as Asia’s Worst Currency: Chart of the Day - Bloomberg
you should come up more with facts and figures instead of nonsense and insult.
Exactly, ASEAN members embrace no interference policy and tend to rule on consensus as a group. Besides, ASEAN has a rotating chairmanship and secretariat. That is fair and well-balanced. Just some clueless outsiders mean ASEAN needs a permanent leader, because in doing so, other members will give up their rights and national sovereignty.
Some delusional Indonesians cheer the idea, of course. BIG=leader.
another delusional Chinese. If you don´t have any clue on economics and politics, you should keep silent. If Germany leaves the European Union as well as the single currency Euro, then Europe will collapse. If Indonesia leaves ASEAN, nobody notices.
Because Indonesian footprint on other ASEAN member countries is too small.
The king has chinese descent. and most of the PMs and opposition leaders are the same
Indonesia is the right choice but Thailand has the potential as long as we have peace here
I´m still waiting that You challenge my point with facts and figures: Indonesia economic footprint on other ASEAN members is small. Nice try to discredit me with "overseas" Vietnamese.You ever heard the expression "No ASEAN without Indonesian." Well, that's going to happen if we leave. Without us keeping the member states in check the group will probably falls apart.
Yes, our footprint is so small. Because an overseas Vietnamese told us so, not from a respectable source, but from the word of a nobody on the net:
Investments in ASEAN region: Mekong countries and Indonesia perspective (English) / - China Law & Practice
I´m still waiting that You challenge my point with facts and figures: Indonesia economic footprint on other ASEAN members is small. Nice try to discredit me with "overseas" Vietnamese.
By the way Did you read the article you posted? I do.
This is the importance of Indonesia to ASEAN, rather than one man’s leadership or Indonesia’s size alone. There is no sign that the basic policy orientation of Indonesia or its fundamental commitment to regionalism has diminished despite the political changes that the country is undergoing.
At the same time, after the turmoil of 1965 and 1966, Indonesia made clear its continued adherence to a national policy of ethnic, racial and religious tolerance, and of unity in diversity that had kept, and continues to keep, the nation together. This had a reassuring effect on its would-be partners in ASEAN, all of whom were blessed with ethnic diversity and threatened by ethnic division. Moreover, Indonesia, in its wisdom, allowed itself to wield its already considerable weight in the world in the new context of ASEAN. In this way, ASEAN has been able to avoid the problems of some other regional associations, which are hampered and burdened by the dominance of their largest members. Instead, Indonesia’s international influence, prestige and activism, magnified by its new internationalist posture, were to be placed in ASEAN’s service at the UN, in the Non-Aligned Movement, in the Group of 77 and in other international forums.
With its vast natural resources and bustling population of around 240 million people, Indonesia is being considered as one of the most lucrative investment destinations and fastest growing economies in the world. In comparison to others, Indonesia is third only to China and India among the G20 industrialised and developing nations. Having overcome the Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s, and withstood the worst of the more recent global economic slowdown, Indonesia has shown itself to be a resilient economy whose industries have proven to be one of the most attractive for foreign investors.
So, get out of ASEAN, who cares.You ever heard the expression "No ASEAN without Indonesian." Well, that's going to happen if we leave. Without us keeping the member states in check the group will probably falls apart.
Yes, our footprint is so small. Because an overseas Vietnamese told us so, not from a respectable source, but from the word of a nobody on the net:
Investments in ASEAN region: Mekong countries and Indonesia perspective (English) / - China Law & Practice
Leader doesnt means biggest, on military and diplomat, Vietnam shoud lead because of rich experience on many real, long wars.
Vietnam both deal with military and diplomat with France and America.
We can burn ur country to the ground within one month with our ballistic missile Scud -D if we want, and u dont have any ballistic missile to fight back, wanna be a leader ??ahhaahh, cheap joke
We dont care who lead ASEAN we just need sub mekong region
U cant get ballistic missile from any contries coz no one are allowed to sell ballistic missile, so u r on ur own and die aloneyeah you do that, and Indonesia will get a great massive weapons supply either from the west and from the Chinese and good enough to leveling both Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh city
We also can burn Singapore to the ground within 1 week and they also cant fight back coz they dont have ballistic missile, toomadokafc said:What i think about Viets people is, they are, all of them is a good soldier, a brave nation, a brave country, but that is all. What i think about the Singaporeans, well they are highly educated, they are very well managed their live, their country, they are a good banker and trader, but that's all.
New Recruit
I just explain why Indonesia or Singapore is not powerful enough to be ASEAN leader