Can India beat China ?

[FNFAL]

LOL ...if you need a textbook example of a flame thread this one ranks waaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy up there.

Its funny how the thread starter just lights up a fire and expects the "contesting" parties to add more fuel. ANd just to show he`s nuetral and a true patriot he adds ...

"India won't be able to leapfrog China in the near future but anything is possible...."....gr8

Man...i dunno but i would seriously avoid going into the traps. All it does is create animosity.

 

[Wounded-Monk]

Yeah, appreciate that.

China's real goal is not to break India, but to create a good economically win-win partnership with India.

Where do you think the interests of China lies while engaging with US.....

I find it little confusing and somewhat blurred in the recent points of some reports conflicting interests......

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

No my friend,even Chinese cannot afford a war now

Many of the people u see here r far cut of from reality,especially the Chinese bunch here,seems to b a group of teenagers,war seems some console games for them,most talk about war and destruction of India more faster than breathing.

China is at a path of economic progress never seen in their history,with an aim and objective of more improved and economically advanced society even better than US,the last thing they want is a war.

Even if India force a war on them(according to Chinese people)and even India get defeated but still it will have a catastrophic consequence on both Chinese military and economy.

U will all time here about their assumption's about the small,incomparable nuclear arsenal of India based on some outdated NGO reports,but their govt know its better,therefore unlike some Chinese greenhorn's here say,China is never going on a war against India,and for India also the same.

Yeah, historically India was not our enemy, look what Europeans have done to our country during 18-20th century. We can even forgive them if they can stop of acting hostile toward us.

China, in the history, was a nation of peace. She might have the conquest of unifying the people of the same race, but never invading the land of people of another race.

There were the Han Chinese lived in Xinjiang 2000 years ago, even before the Uyghurs immigrated there from Mongolia.

Tibetans are racially our brothers, and Manchus were willing to sinicized themselves because they believed our culture was more advanced. Taiwan was part of China for many hundred of years, even the modern Taiwan was built by Pro-China nationalists. And 98% of Taiwanese are ethnically Chinese, even many of them are a disgrace of denying their true heritage.

Did China ever invade the land of the people of other race? The answer is no.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Where do you think the interests of China lies while engaging with US.....

I find it little confusing and somewhat blurred in the recent points of some reports conflicting interests......

We are making of ourselves to be strong enough, so US can't bully us anymore.

 

[Nomenclature]

But at least some here hope that India can skip at least some of China’s factory-of-the-world strategy. “Could you leapfrog manufacturing?” Mr. Rajan asked. “Can education be the passport to a service economy?”

I'm not worried about India overtaking China as long as Indians still talk about leapfrogging manufacturing into a service economy.

Manufacturing is a necessary step on the road to development for any reasonably sized country, with exceptions of those with very rich natural resources. How else are you going to provide employment to your average citizen?

And don't ever think education will help India leapfrogging China. China has more Top 200 universities than rest of the BRIC combined (which is actually not hard as according to THE's 2010 ranking BRI has not a single university in Top 200). China also spends almost double the amount of money on R&D each year than rest of the BRICs combined.

 

[Paan Singh]

We are making of ourselves to be strong enough, so US can't bully us anymore.

do u know wat u r saying from last few post?

"we are making-------------------------------anymore"

look at past 50 yrs how ussr and how the influence of u.s have declined?
and btw china boundry doesnt start from west of earth to east of earth.
military is not only solution.
today china exports more ,after 15-20 yrs other will do...
so there are lot of things to be determined

 

[Dharmocol]

Yeah, historically India was not our enemy, look what Europeans have done to our country during 18-20th century. We can even forgive them if they can stop of acting hostile toward us.

China, in the history, was a nation of peace. She might have the conquest to unify the people of the same race, but never invading the land of people of another race.

There were the Han Chinese lived in Xinjiang 2000 years ago, even before the Uyghurs immigrated there from Mongolia.

Tibetans are racially our brothers, and Manchus were willing to sinicized themselves because they believed our culture was more advanced. Taiwan was part of China for many hundred of years, even the modern Taiwan was built by Pro-China nationalists. And 98% of Taiwanese are ethnically Chinese, even many of them are a disgrace of denying their true heritage.

Did China invade the land of the people of other race? The answer is no.

well,I am in little doubt,should i count in tibet and taiwan

Butt yeah except Tibet,Taiwan,India, Vietnam and Russia(claim),china never invaded any foreign land,hahaha,just joking

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

^^^ I don't understand Indian jokes.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

do u know wat u r saying from last few post?

"we are making-------------------------------anymore"

look at past 50 yrs how ussr and how the influence of u.s have declined?
and btw china boundry doesnt start from west of earth to east of earth.
military is not only solution.
today china exports more ,after 15-20 yrs other will do...
so there are lot of things to be determined

China is not seeking to match US in the global influence.

We are just making sure that we can defend ourselves from the Western Imperialism, that's it.

 

[Dharmocol]

I'm not worried about India overtaking China as long as Indians still talk about leapfrogging manufacturing into a service economy.

Manufacturing is a necessary step on the road to development for any reasonably sized country, with exceptions of those with very rich natural resources. How else are you going to provide employment to your average citizen?

And don't ever think education will help India leapfrogging China. China has more Top 200 universities than rest of the BRIC combined (which is actually not hard as according to THE's 2010 ranking BRI has not a single university in Top 200). China also spends almost double the amount of money on R&D each year than rest of the BRICs combined.

Sorry friend its a big illusion among Chinese member's here,that an economy had to be manufacturing and export based to develop because China achieved it this way.

Just search on Google my friend,u will find numerous countries in the G-20 itself whose biggest chunk is generated from service sector.

 

[Dharmocol]

^^^ I don't understand Indian jokes.

Never mind,that was not for u

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Just search on Google my friend,u will find numerous countries in the G-20 itself whose biggest chunk is generated from service sector.

Yes, but they all went through the manufacturing stage in their history, which led to urbanization and development. After that, they moved on to become service-orientated.

I don't know of any country... that has actually "skipped" the manufacturing stage of development.

Can you find one?

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

well,I am in little doubt,should i count in tibet and taiwan

Butt yeah except Tibet,Taiwan,India, Vietnam and Russia(claim),china never invaded any foreign land,hahaha,just joking

China did not invade Vietnam, historically northern part of Vietnam was once a part of China's territory, after they gained the independence during the weakness of the Qing Dynasty, we are not seeking to make Vietnam part of our territory anymore.

And how can China invade Russia? Russia as an European country, why does she possess a vast land in Asia? Of course, gained from colonization just like the rest of the European nations. And outer Manchuria was initially part of the Ming Dynasty, after that Russia was starting to annex this part of territory since the beginning of 18th century of the Qing Dynasty.

China does not owe an inch of Indian territory, even the natives in Arunachal were Sino-Tibetan folks who were the blood relatives of the Han Chinese. Indo-Aryan people called them Naga or Kirat, because their Mongoloid appearance just like the Chinese.

 

[Nomenclature]

Sorry friend its a big illusion among Chinese member's here,that an economy had to be manufacturing and export based to develop because China achieved it this way.

Just search on Google my friend,u will find numerous countries in the G-20 itself whose biggest chunk is generated from service sector.

Did they develop by building a service sector first?

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Sorry friend its a big illusion among Chinese member's here,that an economy had to be manufacturing and export based to develop because China achieved it this way.

Just search on Google my friend,u will find numerous countries in the G-20 itself whose biggest chunk is generated from service sector.

Manufacturing is good for building up the infrasturcture.

Otherwise, you don't possess the backbone even you have a strong service sector.

China's manufacturing ability is the decisive factor that make China being much capable of producing indigenous weapons than India.