Burma is for Buddhists

[Aung Zaya]

I could. Actually there are many links before me. Just cant post any links now

So that may be false.. Coz temples in arakan which is age of thousands years are everywhere ., every block of city like Bagan.. And we have many stone script written by ancient arakan alphabets that these were built by arakan kings.. And we have many other evidences as well.. So it's impossible the fact that Arakan was ruled by Muslim..

 

[BDforever]

So that may be false.. Coz temples in arakan which is age of thousands years are everywhere ., every block of city like Bagan.. And we have many stone script written by ancient arakan alphabets that these are built by arakan kings.. And we have many other evidences as well.. So it's impossible the fact that Arakan being rule by Muslim..

hello mate ! ! In today's our Victory Day occassion, i wish you a prgressive and happy life

 

[TopCat]

So that may be false.. Coz temples in arakan which is age of thousands years are everywhere ., every block of city like Bagan.. And we have many stone script written by ancient arakan alphabets that these were built by arakan kings.. And we have many other evidences as well.. So it's impossible the fact that Arakan was ruled by Muslim..

Bengal is the birth place of Buddhism and all our artifacts are actually Buddhist including monasteries which are at least 1000 to 2500 years old. Does that mean we should expel all the muslim from BD?

Sry.. We will never accept even citizenship them if they are out our immigrantion law.. If u are willing to take back ur people .. We will offer free shipments.. If not.. They will have to be under MM's rule coz they live in MM.. The best way is to take them by some rich Muslim countries who pity them in equalities.. So they happy.., MM happy., Muslim countries happy.. Win-win solution..

With this kind of attitude MM will remain as gutter which is not respectable I suppose. Well if you know what respect means ofcourse.

 

[samv]

Correct me if I'm wrong but Bengal is not the birth place of Buddhism. The Buddha, as Prince Sidhartha was born in Lumbini. He is thought to have became Englightened in a place what is now known as Bodh Gaya. His first sermon is thought to have been given in what is now Sarnath. These are all places in either Nepal or Bihar/Uttar pradesh.

 

[HeinzG]

Correct me if I'm wrong but Bengal is not the birth place of Buddhism. The Buddha, as Prince Sidhartha was born in Lumbini. He is thought to have became Englightened in a place what is now known as Bodh Gaya. His first sermon is thought to have been given in what is now Sarnath. These are all places in either Nepal or Bihar/Uttar pradesh.

Buddhism doesn't belong to any place. It's a universal philosophy.

 

[Capt.Popeye]

Bengal is the birth place of Buddhism and all our artifacts are actually Buddhist including monasteries which are at least 1000 to 2500 years old. Does that mean we should expel all the muslim from BD?

Where did you learn your history? Did you go to school?
More likely that Bengal is the birth-place of Martians then......

Correct me if I'm wrong but Bengal is not the birth place of Buddhism. The Buddha, as Prince Sidhartha was born in Lumbini. He is thought to have became Englightened in a place what is now known as Bodh Gaya. His first sermon is thought to have been given in what is now Sarnath. These are all places in either Nepal or Bihar/Uttar pradesh.

You are right. Don't pay any attention to fictional stories!
But later; as @HeinzG says: Buddhism became an Universal philosophy for all Mankind, not any single person or country's property.

hello mate ! ! In today's our Victory Day occassion, i wish you a prgressive and happy life

@BDforever ; Happy Victory Day to you and all your Countrymen (minus the Razakars, Jamatis and other collaborators of course).

 

[alaungphaya]

In BD minorities enjoy far more perks than their demographic ratio would qualify. In the cabinet, parliament and bureaucracy their numbers are far in excess of their percentage of population. In terms of economy, employment and literacy they are far better off. All these because we consciously lobby for their welfare.

Again, this is coming from a proponent of sharia law and jihadism. Pathetic.

Bengal is the birth place of Buddhism and all our artifacts are actually Buddhist including monasteries which are at least 1000 to 2500 years old. Does that mean we should expel all the muslim from BD?



With this kind of attitude MM will remain as gutter which is not respectable I suppose. Well if you know what respect means ofcourse.

Idiot never fails to deliver. Birthplace of Buddhism is it?

 

[bongbang]

Correct me if I'm wrong but Bengal is not the birth place of Buddhism. The Buddha, as Prince Sidhartha was born in Lumbini. He is thought to have became Englightened in a place what is now known as Bodh Gaya. His first sermon is thought to have been given in what is now Sarnath. These are all places in either Nepal or Bihar/Uttar pradesh.

Certainly Bihar was part of Ancient Bengal. Murya empire of Bengal was influenced by Buddhism. Which spread Buddhism far places. Also Atish Dipanka a Buddhist scholar famous in Asia and Tibet born in our area. Maynamati and Sompura Mahabihara are some places which used to be learning places for Buddhism. Somedays back I remember Bangladesh handed over Buddha's hair to Srilanka.

 

[Aung Zaya]

hello mate ! ! In today's our Victory Day occassion, i wish you a prgressive and happy life

of course..!! congratz BD...

Bengal is the birth place of Buddhism and all our artifacts are actually Buddhist including monasteries which are at least 1000 to 2500 years old. Does that mean we should expel all the muslim from BD?

has some knowledge about Buddhism.. Oviously u has no knowledge about it then said what u though of ur own...

With this kind of attitude MM will remain as gutter which is not respectable I suppose. Well if you know what respect means ofcourse.

LOL.. why should we take these Bangladeshi back..? we are poor and can accept some who fit with our immigration law.. it does not mean these bangladeshi are our race...

 

[asad71]

Again, this is coming from a proponent of sharia law and jihadism. Pathetic.



Idiot never fails to deliver. Birthplace of Buddhism is it?

Instead of talking rubbish, answer the post if you can.

 

[bongbang]

So that may be false.. Coz temples in arakan which is age of thousands years are everywhere ., every block of city like Bagan.. And we have many stone script written by ancient arakan alphabets that these were built by arakan kings.. And we have many other evidences as well.. So it's impossible the fact that Arakan was ruled by Muslim..

So what are these coins doing in Arakan?

 

[TopCat]

Certainly Bihar was part of Ancient Bengal. Murya empire of Bengal was influenced by Buddhism. Which spread Buddhism far places. Also Atish Dipanka a Buddhist scholar famous in Asia and Tibet born in our area. Maynamati and Sompura Mahabihara are some places which used to be learning places for Buddhism. Somedays back I remember Bangladesh handed over Buddha's hair to Srilanka.

Dont try to educate these idiots as they think that MM is the center of universe and had no knowledge of the world outside.

Certainly Bihar was part of Ancient Bengal. Murya empire of Bengal was influenced by Buddhism. Which spread Buddhism far places. Also Atish Dipanka a Buddhist scholar famous in Asia and Tibet born in our area. Maynamati and Sompura Mahabihara are some places which used to be learning places for Buddhism. Somedays back I remember Bangladesh handed over Buddha's hair to Srilanka.

Only Pala dynasty of Gaud (present day Murshidabad/Rajshahi) contributed to the spread of Buddhism outside of India far away like Japan. They are very much Bengali

LOL.. why should we take these Bangladeshi back..? we are poor and can accept some who fit with our immigration law.. it does not mean these bangladeshi are our race...

They are cerainly not monkey race but native to the part of Arakan. Either they become the rightful citizen of the palce of their origin or MM relinquish control on that piece of land. Thats how it works. Its your choice.

 

[bongbang]

Dont try to educate these idiots as they think that MM is the center of universe and had no knowledge of the world outside.



Only Pala dynasty of Gaud (present day Murshidabad/Rajshahi) contributed to the spread of Buddhism outside of India far away like Japan. They are very much Bengali


They are cerainly not monkey race but native to the part of Arakan. Either they become the rightful citizen of the palce of their origin or MM relinquish control on that piece of land. Thats how it works. Its your choice.

Oh I completely forgot to mention about Pala Buddhist empire which was completely our home grown. Palas were rice eating bengal people. I was trying to show earlier Buddhist influenced kings like Ashoka of Murya empire. We were part of that too.

 

[Khalid Newazi]

What part of this statement did you not understand?


Myanmar does not count the Rohingyas as citizens. So I dont know what the problem for the OP is. If you are okay with discriminatory laws in favour of Islam in KSA, then you should also be okay with discriminatory laws against Muslims in Myanmar.

Oh and Myanmar is making laws against non-citizens. It considers Rohingyas as illegal immigrants and wants them out. By hook or crook.

Myanmar does not count the Rohingyas as citizens. Then Rakhine State doesn't belong to Myanmar but to Rohingyas. Bangladesh have plenty of Rakhine people in our territory and thus see no problem for Rakhine State to be part of Bangladesh.

 

[Judge]

Myanmar does not count the Rohingyas as citizens. Then Rakhine State doesn't belong to Myanmar but to Rohingyas. Bangladesh have plenty of Rakhine people in our territory and thus see no problem for Rakhine State to be part of Bangladesh.

Unfortunately Khalid, you can not decide what area remains with which country.
Rakhine remains with Myanmar.

Myanmar as a State does have the Sovereign Right to deprive people of citizenship and eject them. Which it is doing. All Bangladesh can do is either accept the refugees or reject them from your country.

Ofcourse, killing Rohingyas is illegal and one that can be taken up by UN legally.