ayesha.a
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2012
- Messages
- 1,336
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
Every constitution does but does the same Indian Constitution gives open hand to Indian Armed Forces to take deadly measures against Children too?
I have deliberately refrained from posting most disturbing images but an informed person like U does know about them all.
The injuries and deaths are awful, especially of children. But is it really the fault of the armed forces? Should children be part of these (violent) protests, in the first place?
Look at it neutrally, and tell me if the armed forces could have done any better - was it possible to use any less force? You might believe that the Indian army is an occupying force there - but regardless of that, could they have defended themselves against these attackers in any better manner? If the Pakistan army was in a similar situation, would they not have used as much or more force?
Regardless of your views about Kashmir and India, laying the blame for these injuries on the Indian forces is really missing the point. I'm not sure what you expect them to do differently.