What's new

Burhan Wani death: 'Azaadi' slogans for Kashmir and Manipur raised in Kolkata

1) Muslims are not allowed to eat beef why? Same Hindus when they are out of India are eating beef themselves I have seen with my own eyes but in India they kill and beat Muslims for the same
Indians are not allowed to eat other humans as well, why arent u protesting for cannibalism to be allowed. Recently a north east state has banned dog meat. And muslims can go without beef, its not that they will die by not eating beef.

Why have not we seen even a single Muslim indian army chief though muslims are 15 % and Sikhs only 1 % we have seen plenty Sikhs . Muslims overall are not given army jobs though owing to their healthy diets and educated background they are always better than Hindus and Sikhs.
You may say there was aMuslim president but thats not a power post as you know what I mean.
Muslims in india till 1971 still carried the idea of two nation theory and hated india.
But after bangladesh liberation, their view changed and a lot of muslims have been joining armed forces.
Senior ranks are given by seniority, even a jew was a lt. Gen who was responsible for u surrender. And Lt. Gen syed ata hasnain was the guy who brought kashmir insurgency to its lowest by winning hearts and minds.

3) Muslims are not even allowed to buy property at their place of choice in Sickular india.
http://www.bollywoodlife.com/news-g...fficult-for-a-muslim-to-buy-a-house-in-india/
And thats about a filthy rich Khandani Nawab and a Super star who has married a Hindu woman so you can imagine the fate of common Muslims

Its because of being a non vegitarian. Even non vegitarians dont get apartments. Nothing to do with religion. People dont like smell of meat cooking near their homes.
 
.
Indians are not allowed to eat other humans as well, why arent u protesting for cannibalism to be allowed. Recently a north east state has banned dog meat. And muslims can go without beef, its not that they will die by not eating beef.


Muslims in india till 1971 still carried the idea of two nation theory and hated india.
But after bangladesh liberation, their view changed and a lot of muslims have been joining armed forces.
Senior ranks are given by seniority, even a jew was a lt. Gen who was responsible for u surrender. And Lt. Gen syed ata hasnain was the guy who brought kashmir insurgency to its lowest by winning hearts and minds.



Its because of being a non vegitarian. Even non vegitarians dont get apartments. Nothing to do with religion. People dont like smell of meat cooking near their homes.

Ok

I am sure even you realize how ridiculous you sound .
 
.
And the same Indian constitution also gives Indian Armed Forces the right to take violent measures against such elements who take up guns against the Indian Union and kill/threaten to kill Indian citizens.

Every constitution does but does the same Indian Constitution gives open hand to Indian Armed Forces to take deadly measures against Children too?

childsnipervictim.jpg

india-kashmir-police-2.jpg


indias-use-of-non-lethal-pellet-gun-continues-to-blind-kashmiri-boys-body-image-1433877329.jpg


1ddd269040544534bdf631f29179ad03_8.jpg


Abdul-Qayyum-Butt-of-Soura.jpg


I have deliberately refrained from posting most disturbing images but an informed person like U does know about them all.
 
.
Because this Hinducracy is making troubles in whole of South asia from Nepal till Afghanistan.



Either you are a false named or a rarely lucky one or some one who has not lived in India for ages.

1) Muslims are not allowed to eat beef why? Same Hindus when they are out of India are eating beef themselves I have seen with my own eyes but in India they kill and beat Muslims for the same.
2) Why have not we seen even a single Muslim indian army chief though muslims are 15 % and Sikhs only 1 % we have seen plenty Sikhs . Muslims overall are not given army jobs though owing to their healthy diets and educated background they are always better than Hindus and Sikhs.
You may say there was aMuslim president but thats not a power post as you know what I mean.
3) Muslims are not even allowed to buy property at their place of choice in Sickular india.
http://www.bollywoodlife.com/news-g...fficult-for-a-muslim-to-buy-a-house-in-india/
And thats about a filthy rich Khandani Nawab and a Super star who has married a Hindu woman so you can imagine the fate of common Muslims.

Do you even know the story of Great Burhan Wani what turned him against Indian aggressors?

You failed to answer my question. I asked you to name 3 things that Hindus can do, but Muslims cannot.

1) Neither Hindus nor Muslims are allowed to eat beef in many parts of India. In some parts of India, both Muslims and Hindus can and do eat beef. Outside India too, both Hindus and Muslims can eat beef. Where is the unequality?

2) You could say that about Hindus as well. 15-20% of Jawans are Sikhs, even though they are only 2% of the population. Hindus don't have that ratio either. The reason being culture - soldiering has been a traditional profession for Sikhs, and Punjabi-Haryanwis in general. Not so for most other parts of India.

BTW, just curious, how many Hindu or Christian army chiefs has Pakistan had? India has had Muslim and Sikh presidents and prime ministers. (Zakir Hussain, Zail Singh, Abdul Kalam, Manmohan SIngh...) Do you want to compare your record of equality of opportunity?

3) Not by law. Yes, some landowners who hate Muslims refuse to sell to Muslims. It works the other way too, in some Muslim dominated villages in North-central India. I won't deny that there is religious bigotry. But that is not institutional.

I'll repeat the question. Can you name three things; scratch that; can you name one thing that Hindus can do, but Muslims cannot, by law in India?

Your beef example shows (Hindus eating beef outside India is somehow oppression of Muslims?) that you have difficulty in comprehension. So please read the question carefully this time.
 
. .
Because this Hinducracy is making troubles in whole of South asia from Nepal till Afghanistan.



Either you are a false named or a rarely lucky one or some one who has not lived in India for ages.

1) Muslims are not allowed to eat beef why? Same Hindus when they are out of India are eating beef themselves I have seen with my own eyes but in India they kill and beat Muslims for the same.
2) Why have not we seen even a single Muslim indian army chief though muslims are 15 % and Sikhs only 1 % we have seen plenty Sikhs . Muslims overall are not given army jobs though owing to their healthy diets and educated background they are always better than Hindus and Sikhs.
You may say there was aMuslim president but thats not a power post as you know what I mean.
3) Muslims are not even allowed to buy property at their place of choice in Sickular india.
http://www.bollywoodlife.com/news-g...fficult-for-a-muslim-to-buy-a-house-in-india/
And thats about a filthy rich Khandani Nawab and a Super star who has married a Hindu woman so you can imagine the fate of common Muslims.

Do you even know the story of Great Burhan Wani what turned him against Indian aggressors?
Let me attempt:
1. Beef is banned by many states in India like Jammu & Kashmir, Maharashtra, Gujarat etc but not banned in some states like Goa, Kerala, Assam, West Bengal etc. Its a state matter and applicable to people of all religions.
2. Appointment of Army Chief has nothing to do with one's religion. India has seen top army posts being held by hindus, sikhs, muslims, jews and parsis. Lt. General (retd) M A Naik was a muslim from J&K. Our ex Air Force Chief Idris Hassan Latif, Air Chief Marshal was a muslim.
3. If a hindu man married off his daughter to a muslim man then why would he not sell or rent a house to a muslim?
Hope that answers your questions.

The constitution of India gives you several democratic rights but unfortunately it does not allow you to take up violence. There are many other separatists in J&K like Gilani, Moulvi Omar etc. they are very vocal about it also but they have not resorted to violence and hence can enjoy all the freedom. Unfortunately this young boy got misguided and met this unfortunate fate. People forget that among the deads are policemen too who too were kashmiris.
 
.
Let me attempt:
1. Beef is banned by many states in India like Jammu & Kashmir, Maharashtra, Gujarat etc but not banned in some states like Goa, Kerala, Assam, West Bengal etc. Its a state matter and applicable to people of all religions.
2. Appointment of Army Chief has nothing to do with one's religion. India has seen top army posts being held by hindus, sikhs, muslims, jews and parsis. Lt. General (retd) M A Naik was a muslim from J&K. Our ex Air Force Chief Idris Hassan Latif, Air Chief Marshal was a muslim.
3. If a hindu man married off his daughter to a muslim man then why would he not sell or rent a house to a muslim?
Hope that answers your questions.

The constitution of India gives you several democratic rights but unfortunately it does not allow you to take up violence. There are many other separatists in J&K like Gilani, Moulvi Omar etc. they are very vocal about it also but they have not resorted to violence and hence can enjoy all the freedom. Unfortunately this young boy got misguided and met this unfortunate fate. People forget that among the deads are policemen too who too were kashmiris.

Syed Ata Hasnain, as commander of XV corps, was responsible for keeping Kashmir Indian. The security of the entire state was under his command. (And he didn't disappoint.) He was also the Director General of Military Operations, and later Military Secretary. Previously he also commanded the Victor force of the Rashtriya Rifles, and was responsible for counter insurgency of South Kashmir.

@Albatross : Do you still want to compare our records? Has any Hindu or Christian or Sikh achieved a 3 star rank in your military?

Senior ranks are given by seniority, even a jew was a lt. Gen who was responsible for u surrender.

And the army chief at the time was a Parsi. Only in India!
 
.
You failed to answer my question. I asked you to name 3 things that Hindus can do, but Muslims cannot.

1) Neither Hindus nor Muslims are allowed to eat beef in many parts of India. In some parts of India, both Muslims and Hindus can and do eat beef. Outside India too, both Hindus and Muslims can eat beef. Where is the unequality?

2) You could say that about Hindus as well. 15-20% of Jawans are Sikhs, even though they are only 2% of the population. Hindus don't have that ratio either. The reason being culture - soldiering has been a traditional profession for Sikhs, and Punjabi-Haryanwis in general. Not so for most other parts of India.

BTW, just curious, how many Hindu or Christian army chiefs has Pakistan had?

3) Not by law. Yes, some landowners who hate Muslims refuse to sell to Muslims. It works the other way too, in some Muslim dominated villages in North-central India. I won't deny that there is religious bigotry. But that is not institutional.

I'll repeat the question. Can you name three things; scratch that; can you name one thing that Hindus can do, but Muslims cannot, by law in India?

Your beef example shows (Hindus eating beef outside India is somehow oppression of Muslims?) that you have difficulty in comprehension. So please read the question carefully this time.

Its never about Law but how its bent to accommodate certain people.

Muslims should be allowed to eat beef as its in their religion and when certain factions deny them this right its Govt job to ensure it doesnt happen but what we see here is BJP leaders are leading such acts against muslims.
Pakistan has less than 1 % Hindus and Christians overall and their presence in army is accordingly very less as well.

As I said you cant find such things in Law but how men in power use their affiliation to bend law is what counts.
We saw Jaats protesting in Herayana few months back but though they were confronted with army we didnt see live bullets and pellet injuring hundreds and killing dozens though they were much bigger in number and thats my point Muslims are treated as 2nd class citizen though by all means they are more educated,mannered and morally sound than the majority of Hindus who drinks cow pee considering it sacred and I am not making it up its truth they even sell it in bottles so you can imagine what a filthy race they are anyways I dont wanna go offtopic here but there are thousands of examples where muslims are denied their rights.

Modi the butcher of Muslims in Gujrat who is a world renowned terrorists and was not allowed Visa of US and rest of civil word for ages is chosen PM by majority Hindus showing their sickular mentality.
 
.
It's not abnormal..
Communist SFI goons do same in every incident happening around country..
They don't impact much & they are losing ground all over India & very less in number..
Big losers..
 
.
Every constitution does but does the same Indian Constitution gives open hand to Indian Armed Forces to take deadly measures against Children too?

childsnipervictim.jpg

india-kashmir-police-2.jpg


indias-use-of-non-lethal-pellet-gun-continues-to-blind-kashmiri-boys-body-image-1433877329.jpg


1ddd269040544534bdf631f29179ad03_8.jpg


Abdul-Qayyum-Butt-of-Soura.jpg


I have deliberately refrained from posting most disturbing images but an informed person like U does know about them all.

When Police fires rubber bullets or pellets or water cannons at a mob to disperse them or to break a riot, then its pretty hard to choose individual targets. If there would be elderly people or women or children in that mob, then its very likely that they would get hit too. Any parent who cares about his/her child wouldn't allow his children to even go near a confrontation between a mob and police. Those kids and teenagers who pics you've posted, shouldn't have been near the mob when a protest/riot was going on.
 
.
Its never about Law but how its bent to accommodate certain people.

Muslims should be allowed to eat beef as its in their religion and when certain factions deny them this right its Govt job to ensure it doesnt happen but what we see here is BJP leaders are leading such acts against muslims.
Pakistan has less than 1 % Hindus and Christians overall and their presence in army is accordingly very less as well.

As I said you cant find such things in Law but how men in power use their affiliation to bend law is what counts.
We saw Jaats protesting in Herayana few months back but though they were confronted with army we didnt see live bullets and pellet injuring hundreds and killing dozens though they were much bigger in number and thats my point Muslims are treated as 2nd class citizen though by all means they are more educated,mannered and morally sound than the majority of Hindus who drinks cow pee considering it sacred and I am not making it up its truth they even sell it in bottles so you can imagine what a filthy race they are anyways I dont wanna go offtopic here but there are thousands of examples where muslims are denied their rights.

Modi the butcher of Muslims in Gujrat who is a world renowned terrorists and was not allowed Visa of US and rest of civil word for ages is chosen PM by majority Hindus showing their sickular mentality.

1) Well yes, there is religious bigotry in India. Nowhere close to the amount in certain other countries, but it is there. But as a nation, everybody is equal in the eyes of the law.

2) Jats weren't asking for sedition from India. Nor were they supporting armed insurgents. Nor have they ever taken up arms against the nation. There is a big difference. BTW, muslims can and do protest in other regions of India - they don't face live bullets either.

Even in the recent protest in Kashmir, do you see the army firing at protestors? If that happened, how many people would be dead? If one armyman with an automatic rifle opened fire, how many people would die? The security forces there are exercising the maximum possible restraint under the circumstances.

3) I'm no fan of Modi, but the rest of the world does NOT consider him a terrorist. No matter how many times you say it, it doesn't become true. All countries, from USA to Saudi Arabia to Iran have welcomed him with open arms. (That's more a welcome for the nation, not the man.) There is enough legitimate criticism that can be directed at him for the handling of the riots in 2002. But your over the top rhetoric ain't that.

BTW, Saudi Arabia recently gave him their highest civilian award. As I said, I'm no fan of his, but you have to stop making these strawmen figures to attack; it serves no purpose. When you say things like the entire world consider him a terrorist, it is an immediately disprovable claim.

the majority of Hindus who drinks cow pee considering it sacred and I am not making it up its truth they even sell it in bottles so you can imagine what a filthy race they are

And you were complaining about religious bigotry in India? :)
 
.
Every constitution does but does the same Indian Constitution gives open hand to Indian Armed Forces to take deadly measures against Children too?

childsnipervictim.jpg

india-kashmir-police-2.jpg


indias-use-of-non-lethal-pellet-gun-continues-to-blind-kashmiri-boys-body-image-1433877329.jpg


1ddd269040544534bdf631f29179ad03_8.jpg


Abdul-Qayyum-Butt-of-Soura.jpg


I have deliberately refrained from posting most disturbing images but an informed person like U does know about them all.



May Allah let me live long enough to see the day, the Pakistani armed forces skin alive those bastards who did this to these kids. We have already taken revenge of APS kids, about time we take revenge of these Kids as well.
 
.
It would not be an exaggeration to say that Pakistanis have let kashmiris down.
Even if they come in big numbers and stage a peaceful protest then world will take notice or they can wage jihad. But they have failed to do either post Kargil. Their young gen doesn't seem much interested.
 
.
481916-azaadi.jpg


POOJA MEHTA | Fri, 15 Jul 2016-02:11pm , dna webdesk
Azaadi slogans were raised at a rally, organised in Kolkata to protest the ongoing unrest in Kashmir.


Azaadislogans were raised at a rally, organised in Kolkata to protest against the death of over 30 people in Kashmir following the death of Hizbul Mujahideen commander Burhan Wani. Left-backed organisations comprising students and other members of rights groups converged at the College Square and marched towards the Sealdah station, sporting placards which read, ‘de-militarise Kashmir’ and raised slogans like, ‘Kashmir maange azaadi, Manipur maange azaadi’.


“We are demanding azaadi for Kashmir and Manipur. Azaadi for us means withdrawal of army and AFSPA. The people are oppressed by the army and it has resulted in so many deaths. It’s high time that these two states should be freed from armed forces and AFSPA,” said Mrinmoy Sarkar from the Progressive Democratic Students' Federation (PDSF) organisation.

Sarkar alleged that ever since the rally was announced, they received a number of threats from right-wing organisations. “There was every attempt to silence us. A lot of people who were to participate in this rally were threatened. But, we can’t be silent anymore. Everyday, the death toll and number of injured is rising in Kashmir. We must stand united for the people of Kashmir.”

This protest rally comes in the wake of simultaneous protests being organised by the several groups across the country. On Wednesday, similar rally was organised at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar.

13706127_1345496155464478_1001922821_n.jpg


13689797_1345499788797448_164201507_n.jpg


13689834_1345499892130771_2064379115_n.jpg



This is what is wrong with this world...terrorism apologism....congratulations to India for making worm food in hell out of this looser ! :cheers::tup:

My advice...put these "protestors" in working prisons....traitorous leeches deserve nothing less.
 
.
May Allah let me live long enough to see the day, the Pakistani armed forces skin alive those bastards who did this to these kids. We have already taken revenge of APS kids, about time we take revenge of these Kids as well.

AAMEEN.
It makes me even more sad that rather be apologetic for such incidents of torturing, injuring and killing of kids, almost all Indian members are calling for more brutal force being used in IOK. I am not asking them to condemn is but being apologetic for such incidence is least what humanity asks for. I could have posted more horrific pictures here but firstly my conscientious didnt allow me to do so, secondly all Indian members wud turned just blind eye like happened right now, with "Crush them All" slogans everywhere.

When Police fires rubber bullets or pellets or water cannons at a mob to disperse them or to break a riot, then its pretty hard to choose individual targets. If there would be elderly people or women or children in that mob, then its very likely that they would get hit too. Any parent who cares about his/her child wouldn't allow his children to even go near a confrontation between a mob and police. Those kids and teenagers who pics you've posted, shouldn't have been near the mob when a protest/riot was going on.

My friend thats why i deliberately posted pic number two to show that no one out there is spared. I am sure they can distinguish between kids and grown ups. Just notice how the cop at extreme right is being stopped by another cop near him to beat that kid in front of him.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom