What's new

Bucking stagnation elsewhere, the quiet rise of South Asia

anant_s

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
5,600
Reaction score
92
Country
India
Location
India
South Asia has long been seen as an economic laggard, but that could start changing. At a time when growth is falling sharply in most other emerging nations, as commodity prices collapse and global trade slows, South Asia has proved relatively resilient. Together, India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Pakistan are now growing at an average annual pace of close to 6%, compared to 2% for the emerging world outside China.
Due to their lower per capita income, it should hardly be surprising that South Asian economies are growing faster than other emerging markets. But that spread of nearly four percentage points is the largest in the region's post-independence history. While hopes for a revival in India exploded when Prime Minister Narendra Modi took power in 2014, promising major economic reform, its smaller neighbours remained under the radar. Now, however, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Pakistan are leading the quiet rise of South Asia.
Since the global financial crisis, a number of emerging markets have been ramping up debt and government spending. But the smaller South Asian economies have largely avoided these excesses, so they still have room to boost growth. While falling prices for oil and other raw materials are hurting most emerging regions, they are a boon to the nations of South Asia, all of which are commodity importers.
jpg.jpg

The impact of low commodity prices is helping to keep inflation low even as growth accelerates, while countries like Brazil, Russia and South Africa face stagflation. Many emerging economies have been hurt by rising wages and have seen their share of global exports decline, but not Pakistan and Bangladesh. Their wages are still competitive, and they are increasing their share of global exports, even as growth in global trade is stagnating for the first time since the 1980s.

They are benefitting along with Sri Lanka as manufacturers look for cheaper wages outside of China, with wages in the manufacturing sector having increased by 370% in the world's second largest economy over the past decade. Bangladesh is now the second leading exporter, after China, of ready-made clothes to the US and Germany.

And as China and Japan compete with India for influence in the Indian Ocean, they are pouring billions into new ports in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The upshot of these positive trends is that South Asia could sustain a growth rate of over 5% for the next few years, which would make it one of the fastest-growing regions in the emerging world.

The competition between Japan and China is a huge boost: after Beijing recently announced plans to build a $46 billion "economic corridor" connecting Pakistan to China, Japan beat out China for rights to build Bangladesh's first deep-water port, at Matarbari. The inflow of foreign direct investment is helping to keep South Asia in what can be identified as the investment sweet spot: strong economies tend to invest between 25 and 35% of GDP. Sri Lanka and Bangladesh are now right in the sweet spot, at or near 30% of GDP.

Investment also tends to have the greatest impact on jobs and growth when it is going into manufacturing. Both Sri Lanka and Bangladesh have strong manufacturing sectors, representing 18% of GDP. Pakistan is much weaker, with investment at 14% and manufacturing at 12% of GDP. But Pakistan's manufacturing sector is now growing, due to both increasing electric output and the fact that - like Bangladesh - its young population and labour force is expected to continue expanding for at least the next five years.

At a time when much of the workforce is entering retirement age in larger emerging nations including China, Korea, Taiwan and Russia, the positive demographic trends in South Asia are potentially a big competitive advantage. With exports and investment strong, Bangladesh is running a current account surplus, Sri Lanka is reducing a deficit now equal to 3% of GDP, and Pakistan has cut its current account deficit from 8% of GDP in 2008 to just 1%.
Just as important, these South Asian nations have managed to keep growth alive without sinking deep into debt. All three don't have credit troubles, with relatively modest growth in private credit as a share of GDP over the last five years, and loan to deposit ratios of less than 80% - well below the 100% level which signals that banks are overextended.

This marks South Asia as an island of opportunity in a world where many big emerging countries, led by China but including Turkey, Thailand and Brazil, have seen dangerously sharp expansion of credit in the last five years. India, where around 15% of the loans in the banking system are non-performing, faces similar credit risks.
Governments in South Asia have been working to reduce state meddling in the economy, paring back public debts and deficits. The governments of Bangladesh and Sri Lanka are still running deficits of at least 5% of GDP, but they are coming down. Despite being hobbled by allegations of corruption, the government of Nawaz Sharif has pushed a reform agenda including privatisation since his election in May 2013. The government deficit has fallen to less than 5% from 8.5% in 2012, and growth has accelerated to more than 5% from 3% before Sharif took office. The consumer is out in force, with television channels reporting record-breaking sales in the run up to Eid and one million square feet of retail space under construction in Lahore alone. Though Pakistan is a Sunni-dominated country it has long had pragmatic relations with the Shiite government in Iran, and could be a beneficiary of the nuclear deal lifting international sanctions on Tehran.
The biggest risk to South Asia is the one that has dogged all its members since independence in the 1940s: political instability and regional hostilities. In essence, the Sharif government in Pakistan and the Awami League government in Bangladesh are trying to revive civilian control in nations long dominated by the military - a campaign that could trigger a backlash in these coup-prone countries. The uncertainty is so high, many Pakistani officials prefer to keep offices in Dubai, and Bangladesh's ruling party is working to permanently sideline all opposition.
In Sri Lanka, President Mahinda Rajapaksa recently called early elections in a bid to hang on to power for a third term, but was rejected by voters wary of his increasingly authoritarian ways. Relieved executives at one local company, who were scared to be openly critical of Rajapaksa when he was in power, said his loss had lifted the "Mugabe risk", at least for now. Rajapaksa is trying to stage a comeback, running for prime minister in the parliamentary elections next month.The old hostilities in South Asia also continue to weigh on trade among its neighbouring states. Trade among neighbours has been vital to the rise of East Asia and Eastern Europe, but in South Asia intraregional trade represents just 6% of all trade, lows matched only in parts of Latin America and Africa. There are however signs of improvement as the Indian government begins to reach out to neighbours, and relations are improving particularly with Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.
The final risk is that, after decades of regional stagnation and tension, so many people have migrated abroad that their remittances now account for 7% of GDP or more in the three smaller South Asian states. Without those remittances, the current account balances would be in much worse shape. In Pakistan and Bangladesh most of that income is sent home by expats working in the Gulf region, and is thus subject to the vagaries of both oil prices and Middle East politics.
The long history of conflict and trade fragmentation in South Asia makes it a very hard region to hype. However, India is growing at 5 to 6% - less than government claims but still well above the current emerging market average - and its small neighbours are picking up momentum. They are all posting relatively strong growth, with their stock markets up between 30 to 50% over the last three years, and doing it without attracting much attention as a group.Since hype normally signals the end of a good run, it is a big plus that no one is talking up the "South Asian Tigers", at least not yet.
Bucking stagnation elsewhere, the quiet rise of South Asia - The Economic Times
 
.
There is no union called South Asia. It doesn't make sense for them to combine. If we take EU, then growth in France will boost growth in Spain as their economies are interlinked. Not in case of South Asia. All economies in South Asia operate independently.
 
.
Reveling article.. At most times smaller but well performing economies in the region does not get lime light in global financial media due to the sheer domineering market size of India
 
.
Reveling article.. At most times smaller but well performing economies in the region does not get lime light in global financial media due to the sheer domineering market size of India

This is another reason why not to combine all countries together as South Asia
 
.
This is another reason why not to combine all countries together as South Asia

I'd agree.. It wont work like the EU.. Simply because of the size and populace of India.. There wont be equilibrium to be a union
 
.
Reveling article.. At most times smaller but well performing economies in the region does not get lime light in global financial media due to the sheer domineering market size of India

Yes, comparatively the OP give a more balanced view across the region, and summarize as " ... Now, however, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Pakistan are leading the quiet rise of South Asia ...", and I am as optimistic as the OP.

I'd agree.. It wont work like the EU.. Simply because of the size and populace of India.. There wont be equilibrium to be a union

It is quite fragmented in that sense. Pakistan is more integrated with MENA/GCC/Central Asia, Sri Lanka is more a maritime economy resembling Singapore/ASEAN-5, while Bangladesh is an export superpower of RMG.

As mentioned, China & Japan (as well as from Taiwan, Korea) are competing for infra investment along the coasts of IOR, these smaller SA economies will benefit.
 
Last edited:
. .
It is quite fragmented in that sense. Pakistan is more integrated with MENA/GCC/Central Asia, Sri Lanka is more a maritime economy resembling Singapore/ASEAN-5, while Bangladesh is an export superpower of RMG.

As mentioned, China & Japan (as well as from Taiwan, Korea) are competing for infra investment along the coasts of IOR, these smaller SA economies will benefit.

Wow mate.. Was thinking of posting the same but kept for a future post.. Exactly my thoughts.. Like minded i guess

I understand there is a tendency amongst various people here to pull India down but as far as this topic goes; South Asia IS INDIA.
World Development Indicators-Google Public Data Explorer

I dont think anybody belittled India, As the OP states this is about the other nations in the region

Maybe one reason for the region cannot to be a economic union is the massive inferiority complex shown by your post, Despite India being the dominating nation in South Asia in terms of size and population.. Lets hope the policy makers of India does not hold the same view
 
.
I dont think anybody belittled India, As the OP states this is about the other nations in the region

Maybe one reason for the region cannot to be a economic union is the massive inferiority complex shown by your post, Despite India being the dominating nation in South Asia in terms of size and population.. Lets hope the policy makers of India does not hold the same view
Right. Pointing out an obvious fact by me turns into a show of 'inferiority complex' and that's why South Asia (1.6 Bn) isn't integrated.:lol: Thats a real gem there, mate.

As for belittling, I have engaged with the guy directly above me and I know what was implied in that post. I don't need any pointers from you. Have a good day. :lazy:
 
.
@ito is right in pointing out that while some sort of co-operation is possible between SAARC countries, it is difficult to think in terms of a more cohesive organization such as EU.
Basic reason behind this is that each nation has a very different competency and GDP model. Countries like Sri-lanka depend heavily on Agriculture, maritime activities and fishery, Bangladesh is slowly but surely gaining market in garment industry along with fishery and agriculture. India on other hand has a significant part of its GDP contribution from Service sector and manufacturing and mining, Pakistan still depends largely on agriculture etc.
In this scenario, a free trade agreement between nations will help in leveraging each others competency for overall growth of economy in the region.
Another important thing is Skill development for which country like India can extend help to others if they want) and Tourism sector where a composite policy can attract tourists on a package tours to SAARC nations (Sri-lanka, Maldives and Bhutan are already popular destinations globally.
Finally the power and energy sector, it is important to allow sharing of electricity (through some kind of trade exchange, as done in Europe) to allow industry to develop in all regions uniformly.
Indian Sub-continent is home to a massive portion of human population and unless we all strive to develop together, it will be difficult (if not impossible) to tide over the problem of poverty and economic upliftment in near future.
@Gibbs
 
.
@ito is right in pointing out that while some sort of co-operation is possible between SAARC countries, it is difficult to think in terms of a more cohesive organization such as EU.
Basic reason behind this is that each nation has a very different competency and GDP model. Countries like Sri-lanka depend heavily on Agriculture, maritime activities and fishery, Bangladesh is slowly but surely gaining market in garment industry along with fishery and agriculture. India on other hand has a significant part of its GDP contribution from Service sector and manufacturing and mining, Pakistan still depends largely on agriculture etc.
In this scenario, a free trade agreement between nations will help in leveraging each others competency for overall growth of economy in the region.
Another important thing is Skill development for which country like India can extend help to others if they want) and Tourism sector where a composite policy can attract tourists on a package tours to SAARC nations (Sri-lanka, Maldives and Bhutan are already popular destinations globally.
Finally the power and energy sector, it is important to allow sharing of electricity (through some kind of trade exchange, as done in Europe) to allow industry to develop in all regions uniformly.
Indian Sub-continent is home to a massive portion of human population and unless we all strive to develop together, it will be difficult (if not impossible) to tide over the problem of poverty and economic upliftment in near future.
@Gibbs

Mate on the contrary.. In Sri Lanka the Service sector is the largest contributor to the economy followed by the Industry and only then Agriculture

Service - 56.3%
Industry - 32.7%
Agriculture 10.9%.. I guess these are facts not well known to outsiders simply because of lack of exposure

Sri Lanka's economic growth steady at 6.4% in 1Q 2015

Sri Lanka’s GDP grows 6.4-pct in 2015 first quarter | Lanka Business Online
 
.
SL and BD both posting good growth rates.
 
.
Mate on the contrary.. In Sri Lanka the Service sector is the largest contributor to the economy followed by the Industry and only then Agriculture

Service - 56.3%
Industry - 32.7%
Agriculture 10.9%.. I guess these are facts not well known to outsiders simply because of lack of exposure

Sri Lanka's economic growth steady at 6.4% in 1Q 2015

Sri Lanka’s GDP grows 6.4-pct in 2015 first quarter | Lanka Business Online
Good to know the data.
Traditionally we have associated SL as an agriculture based economy, but i guess with high percentage of literacy in the country, service sector is the usual beneficiary, which your data confirms.
& with relative peace in SL after solution to LTTE problem, i suppose the government can now fully concentrate its energy and budgets on development issues.
 
.
Mate on the contrary.. In Sri Lanka the Service sector is the largest contributor to the economy followed by the Industry and only then Agriculture

Service - 56.3%
Industry - 32.7%
Agriculture 10.9%.. I guess these are facts not well known to outsiders simply because of lack of exposure

Sri Lanka's economic growth steady at 6.4% in 1Q 2015

Sri Lanka’s GDP grows 6.4-pct in 2015 first quarter | Lanka Business Online

Data for PK and IN are available in the following link, however can't find any yet for Bangladesh but I suppose garment manufacturing would be important.
Pakistan 21.8% 23.6% 54.6% (Agri Indus Serv)
India 18.5% 26.3% 55.2% (Agri Indus Serv)
World Average 6% 30.9% 63.2% (Agri Indus Serv)​

And you provided:
Sri Lanka 10.9% 32.7% 56.3% (Agri Indus Serv)​

List of countries by GDP sector composition - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.
Good to know the data.
Traditionally we have associated SL as an agriculture based economy, but i guess with high percentage of literacy in the country, service sector is the usual beneficiary, which your data confirms.
& with relative peace in SL after solution to LTTE problem, i suppose the government can now fully concentrate its energy and budgets on development issues.

The future of the country is based on it's strategic position in the middle of global trading routes.. So the aim of successive govts is to make it a logistical hub (Aviation, Sea Port and Financial). One of those targets are nearly fulfilled.. It's too small to be anything significant in manufacturing

As far as energy goes.. The island is self sufficient and the only nation in the region with nearly 100% coverage and uninterrupted power generation.. But it comes at a cost because they spend large amount of foreign exchange for fossil fuel imports that needs to run a significant number of power plants.. Hopefully this will change with the new govt policy on investment on renewable energy.. And with the recent finding of off shore natural gas fields and agreement with India and Pakistan on civilian nuclear technology transfers that burden will lesson as well

Ministry of Power and Energy :: Home

Sri Lanka Power Report 2014 | Eye Sri Lanka

Yes the LTTE issue dragged the development of the country down for nearly 3 decades
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom