What's new

BSF convoy attacked in IOK

check again may be afghan taliban reached there in emotions

jis speed main wo log province capture kar rahy hain koi bari baat nhi idher udher nikal jaay :lol:
 
How can you call them terrorists do you have any justification?
Even the UN allows an armed struggle against an illegal occupation.
It is you who consider it illigal occupation, well it was you who invaded J&K when it was not a part of India and was an independent nation and it decided to accede with India, after which Indian Army was sent to Srinagar to fight off the invaders, so technically it’s the other side of the story. Anyways, this debate is useless.
 
It is you who consider it illigal occupation, well it was you who invaded J&K when it was not a part of India and was an independent nation and it decided to accede with India, after which Indian Army was sent to Srinagar to fight off the invaders, so technically it’s the other side of the story. Anyways, this debate is useless.
you invaded hyderabad and junagadh ..you had a WAR with hyderabad forces you killed 30,000 of their people and as for kashmir the Pakistan pov is hari singh was invited and asked to sign the IOA AFTER indian forces landed in kashmir...so therefore it was first occupied illegally and then signed to get it made legal....Pakistan on other hand never received a formal response for IOA therefore even formalities werent completed.
 
typical false flagger shenanigans on post of the indians to look like masoom bachoongadas in front of their daddy ol pervert uncle sam the doha conference. heard that the indian delegation tried to invite themselves in while clinging to the shoes of zalmay khalilzad but shown the door leading out by Pakistan, China & Russia.

so they are resorting to these brow beaten little shit tricks to play the lutti pitti beva card! 🙄
 
It is you who consider it illigal occupation, well it was you who invaded J&K when it was not a part of India and was an independent nation and it decided to accede with India, after which Indian Army was sent to Srinagar to fight off the invaders, so technically it’s the other side of the story. Anyways, this debate is useless.
Where do you get such information from? If it isn't "Illegal" why is there such a large number of Protests and Insurgency? And About Hari Singh, Ofcourse he wanted to leave with His Fellow Pandits in India. He Didn't Care about the Muslim Population there.
 
It is you who consider it illigal occupation, well it was you who invaded J&K when it was not a part of India and was an independent nation and it decided to accede with India, after which Indian Army was sent to Srinagar to fight off the invaders, so technically it’s the other side of the story. Anyways, this debate is useless.
By that logic Hyderabad and Junagarh had also acceded to Pakistan then why did you invade them?
 
It is you who consider it illigal occupation, well it was you who invaded J&K when it was not a part of India and was an independent nation and it decided to accede with India, after which Indian Army was sent to Srinagar to fight off the invaders, so technically it’s the other side of the story. Anyways, this debate is useless.
time for arguments is over so save your whining. the decision will be made by the bullet now and mind you, as per your own media and government, Pakistan just got done beating the living shit out of the greatest super power in history... 😏
ab-tera-kya-hoga-kaliya.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom