Vapour
FULL MEMBER

- Joined
- Jul 2, 2020
- Messages
- 1,003
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hamla karne aaye the, khud hi encounter me phas gaye.Long overdue!
Some how they will succeed in next attempts , after all they are fighting with occupying hindutva terrorist forces , and they have every right to burn them like they roasted 40+ Terrorists in palwamaHamla karne aaye the, khud hi encounter me phas gaye.
Militants??Militants fire at BSF convoy in J&K's Kulgam; one CRPF jawan injured.
![]()
Lashkar terrorist killed in Kulgam, traffic suspended on Srinagar-Jammu highway
Two security force personnel were injured after militants opened fire on a BSF convoy in Jammu and Kashmir's Kulgam district.www.indiatoday.in
How can you call them terrorists do you have any justification?
It is you who consider it illigal occupation, well it was you who invaded J&K when it was not a part of India and was an independent nation and it decided to accede with India, after which Indian Army was sent to Srinagar to fight off the invaders, so technically it’s the other side of the story. Anyways, this debate is useless.How can you call them terrorists do you have any justification?
Even the UN allows an armed struggle against an illegal occupation.
you invaded hyderabad and junagadh ..you had a WAR with hyderabad forces you killed 30,000 of their people and as for kashmir the Pakistan pov is hari singh was invited and asked to sign the IOA AFTER indian forces landed in kashmir...so therefore it was first occupied illegally and then signed to get it made legal....Pakistan on other hand never received a formal response for IOA therefore even formalities werent completed.It is you who consider it illigal occupation, well it was you who invaded J&K when it was not a part of India and was an independent nation and it decided to accede with India, after which Indian Army was sent to Srinagar to fight off the invaders, so technically it’s the other side of the story. Anyways, this debate is useless.
Where do you get such information from? If it isn't "Illegal" why is there such a large number of Protests and Insurgency? And About Hari Singh, Ofcourse he wanted to leave with His Fellow Pandits in India. He Didn't Care about the Muslim Population there.It is you who consider it illigal occupation, well it was you who invaded J&K when it was not a part of India and was an independent nation and it decided to accede with India, after which Indian Army was sent to Srinagar to fight off the invaders, so technically it’s the other side of the story. Anyways, this debate is useless.
By that logic Hyderabad and Junagarh had also acceded to Pakistan then why did you invade them?It is you who consider it illigal occupation, well it was you who invaded J&K when it was not a part of India and was an independent nation and it decided to accede with India, after which Indian Army was sent to Srinagar to fight off the invaders, so technically it’s the other side of the story. Anyways, this debate is useless.
time for arguments is over so save your whining. the decision will be made by the bullet now and mind you, as per your own media and government, Pakistan just got done beating the living shit out of the greatest super power in history...It is you who consider it illigal occupation, well it was you who invaded J&K when it was not a part of India and was an independent nation and it decided to accede with India, after which Indian Army was sent to Srinagar to fight off the invaders, so technically it’s the other side of the story. Anyways, this debate is useless.