Spring Onion
PDF VETERAN

- Joined
- Feb 1, 2006
- Messages
- 41,402
- Reaction score
- 19
- Country
- Location
Enlighten Yourself with the terms Independent Baluchistan & Pakhtunistan

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Enlighten Yourself with the terms Independent Baluchistan & Pakhtunistan
In 1947, the British should also have granted Khalistan as a homeland for the Sikh people as they granted Pakistan to the muslims. But the British did not finish their job completely and in haste they finished the job half done. This created a South Asia which has been in unrest and wars till today. This was also partly the fault of the Sikhs since most of them did not demand an independent homeland of their own and threw their lot with the Hindus. They saw the result of this in 1984 with thousands of Sikhs were killed by Indian forces and their most sacred place was invaded by the army. The Sikhs would always remember this and its a wound which would not heal with time. I think if the partition of South Asia had been done properly by the British like asking the muslim majority princely states to join Pakistan and Hindu majority princely states to join India, created Khalistan and also created a Christian homeland at the north east of present India and created proper borders without errors, South Asia would have been living in peace since then and instead of fighting with each other and spending large sums of money on military there would have been total peace and a lot of progress by the people of South Asia. There would have been no reason for tensions as Hindustan would have been a homeland for the Hindus, Pakistan for muslims, some Christian homeland and Khalistan for the Sikhs.![]()
India can also disintegrate if you the hindus keep on discriminating the Sikhs and try to destroy their religion and culture.
Hindus descriminating sikhs!!.....new theory. I am impressed with your knowledge about India. BTW, you again forgot a sikh is PM of India.
PM is having no real power. I am curious to know who has.
As for the partition in '47, Gurdaspur and Firozepur were muslim majority areas and should have been given to Pakistan. Also the muslim majority princely states could have the option to either join Pakistan or stay independent and so the hindu majority princely states.
Offtopic and pure rant.
That made sense. About Khalistan, the present Punjab state of India was the ideal boundary for the Sikh nation. As Haryana and Himacha Pradesh were carved out of the East Punjab of '47, Punjabi speaking areas of Haryana and Himachal Pradesh as well as the Ganganagar district of Rajasthan which is also Punjabi speaking could have been made as the Punjab state of Hindus in India, which could become a true Hindu country with Hinduvta as its ideology.
Presiceely India is not based on solely religion my friend.
Oops...India is not a true Hindu country either. And everyone else is already declared decrimnated.
If you have nothing to contribute except flame, please stay away.
Come on. Discrimination against non-hindus and even hindus of low castes is widespread in India. The hindu culture dont even spare their own hindu brothers who are of low castes, what to talk of other religious minorities. Actually its the Brahmins who are ruling India. Its the Brahmin raj in India. At one time you say Sikhism is no religion, they are Hindus and at the other you discriminate against them. Discrimination in India is common. Making Manmohan Singh as prime minister of India is just to fool the Sikhs. Its not Manmonhan Singh its the Brahmin elite who decides everything. Also Gurdaspur and Firozepur were muslim majority regions and its a fact though mentioned many times. A fact is a fact. Also if India is not a hindu country why muslims can not buy property in some post areas of Mumbai? And where your secularism was when the Gujrat massacre occured? If the British had not collaborated with the hindus and properly divided South Asia as I mentioned there would not have been any more problems in South Asia after '47 as everyone would have been leading their lives without any discrimination in their own respective countries and there would have been no dispute between any South Asian country, thus normal military spendings and betterment of the masses.![]()
whats the use of being a muslim nation. Look at saudi.. the king is a vassal of america. first he bows to white house and then at kaaba, otherwise its the end of the house of saud. look at any other muslim nation. Filled with angry people, people very frustrated because of their inability to counter strength.))) Are sure NOBODY CAN DIVIDE YOU ????
anyway i dont want to get into flaming.
BD is today still a Muslim country and for keeping tab on Bangldeshis for own agenda India had to spend alot on proxies even today.
before creating Karachi, Balochistan and so on you should first concentrate on your North East and over two dozen insurgencies.
There wasn't a demand for a seperate Sikh homeland back in 47, so why would the British establish one ?
whats the use of being a muslim nation. Look at saudi.. the king is a vassal of america. first he bows to white house and then at kaaba, otherwise its the end of the house of saud. look at any other muslim nation. Filled with angry people, people very frustrated because of their impotence to counter strength. Thanks god that i am not in a muslim country.
whats the use of having a homeland. Imagine for a minute, that kashmir is a separate country and so is khalistan, and any other state of india you would like to split. what will happen, these will be rules by some tyrannical despot or will become an islamic wasteland. Now the very people who say respect the majority people, will say that people will have to bow to the will of god or tyrant later on. ultimately the aam aabad are the ones to suffer. So best is, study, get a job, work, marry , have kids and propsper.
That is why these people want a homeland:
I don't need to say much about the Kashmir conflict.
As for the Sikhs:
Operation Blue Star - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
what will the saudi govt do, if osama is sitting inside the Kaaba and has stored weapons and men there, and is conducting terrorist operatinos from there?
I DO NOT mean to insult anyone, this is just an analogy.