gambit
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
- Messages
- 28,569
- Reaction score
- 148
- Country
- Location
So that a big negative on taking that stick out of your ***. Alright I gave it a shot.
You're wrong. Get your facts straight, Van Riper's little gambit (hah) happened just pre-OIF Millennium Challenge 2002 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Here's the article I quoted
Wake-up call | World news | The Guardian
Your argument here is that aircraft carriers are obsolete, or at least useless against alerted and prepared defenses. You brought up what Van Riper did. I have a copy of Van Riper's 1996 work and Desert Storm was in 1991. In the Preface, Van Riper said...
The point here is that in order to defeat a US aircraft carrier battle group, it is not enough that the defender be alerted and well prepared, but that the defender must be well versed in US battle plans that went beyond the hardware that the US may bring to the fight. With that knowledge, particularly of how the US would target the enemy's positions, Van Riper with numerically inferior forces was able to outmaneuver a superior opponent. So yes, not only do I have my facts, I have the documented facts and the time to understand it.Operation Desert Storm confirmed that the decide, detect, deliver and assess methodology works. The process is described without tying it to specific hardware that will eventually become dated. Targeting methodology is not new or revolutionary. It consists of time-tested techniques organized in a systematic framework. Emerging joint targeting doctrinal concepts and other Services' targeting considerations are also presented.