What's new

Britain removes citizenship from two IS brides of Pakistani heritage

.
Perhaps you have a point we need to address a problem here. Why are Turks, Iranians,Turkic Cypriots etc under represented in this radical group but Pakistani's, Banglas, Somali's over represented? I would argue even the Levant Arabs are under represented considering this is their turf war.

The extremist wahhabis groups have more traction in these groups. Turks and Arabs have a better literacy rate in the elder generations and this off spring we're less likely to be converted to wahhabism.

Pakistani, Bengali, Somali Muslims were from less literate backgrounds, our religious understanding not in depth, so the wahhabis could easily convince the youngsters thier parents were heretics.

The people who'll declare thier own parents heretics and idol worshippers are gullible enough to be converted extremism.

That is a billion dollar question. Can somebody please answer this? Why are there no -

  • Banglas
  • Arabs
  • Syrians
  • Palestinians
  • Iraqi's
  • Saudi's

heading to Kashmir to fight the jihad there?

Hopefully the Pakistani army is doing its best to filter these foreign nutcase elements out of the influx into Kashmir.
 
.
No they would not.
No they would not. They would have no alternative. There is indigenous and people whose origins are from abroad. That is us British-Paks. No point in pretending to be dumb by ignoring this reality. If I was John, white and British do you think I would be spending my evening on PDF? Like fcuk I would. Probably getting drunk in pub while shouting "England, England" watching footall.

Hopefully the Pakistani army is doing its best to filter these foreign nutcase elements out of the influx into Kashmir.
There is practically non from these countries fighting in Kashmir unless you know better.
 
.
That is a billion dollar question. Can somebody please answer this? Why are there no -

  • Banglas
  • Arabs
  • Syrians
  • Palestinians
  • Iraqi's
  • Saudi's

heading to Kashmir to fight the jihad there?

They are Muslims with weak faith who don't believe in concept of Ummah.
We are real Muslims and we love Ummah.
We are gonna fight for Ummah.
We are gonna die for Ummah.
It doesn't matter whether Ummah gives a shit about us or not.
It doesn't matter whether we live in Pakistan or abroad, in poverty or in luxury, whether educated or uneducated.
What matters is we are born for Ummah, we live for Ummah and we die for Ummah.
 
.
They are Muslims with weak faith who don't believe in concept of Ummah.
We are real Muslims and we love Ummah.
We are gonna fight for Ummah.
We are gonna die for Ummah.
It doesn't matter whether Ummah gives a shit about us or not.
It doesn't matter whether we live in Pakistan or abroad, in poverty or in luxury, whether educated or uneducated.
What matters is we are born for Ummah, we live for Ummah and we die for Ummah.

#Amen
 
.
They are Muslims with weak faith who don't believe in concept of Ummah.
We are real Muslims and we love Ummah.
We are gonna fight for Ummah.
We are gonna die for Ummah.
It doesn't matter whether Ummah gives a shit about us or not.
It doesn't matter whether we live in Pakistan or abroad, in poverty or in luxury, whether educated or uneducated.
What matters is we are born for Ummah, we live for Ummah and we die for Ummah.
So we are the Ummah's prostitute? Get fcuked by all and then get discarded after being used.

Great !
 
. .
That is a billion dollar question. Can somebody please answer this? Why are there no -

  • Banglas
  • Arabs
  • Syrians
  • Palestinians
  • Iraqi's
  • Saudi's

heading to Kashmir to fight the jihad there?

In the past they did.
Most of the foreigners, however, were from Afghanistan (believe it or not).

See this NY Times article from 1993:

AFGHANS JOINING REBELS IN KASHMIR

"There are about 200 Afghans fighting in Kashmir but we believe that the total figure of foreign fighters is about 400,"...

...interrogation of a captured Afghan and of Kashmiri militants indicated that the Afghans were mostly members of the Hezb-i-Islami party of Prime Minister Gulbuddin Hekmatyar.

...Afghans comprised the bulk of the foreign militants but Muslims of other nationalities also were involved, including people from the Pakistani-controlled part of Kashmir and from Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Sudan.


https://www.nytimes.com/1993/08/24/world/afghans-joining-rebels-in-kashmir.html

But, as I said, that was in the past, more than 25 years ago.
 
Last edited:
.
This is the section of Pakistani society that needs to be controlled with force. Britain is doing the right thing after a long time, remember people like Anjem Choudhry could walk and talk freely was because of freedom of speech and British laws made to protect the freedom and give equality to each and every British citizen. Only in the UK he could shout death to Britain and Her Army, I would love to see Anjem Choudhry shout death to Pak Army in Pakistan, something tells me he would end with a bullet in his head. This is the freedom that Britain offers and this is the freedom that some section of British Pakistanis have exploited.
 
Last edited:
. .
Their husbands are part of the most brutal terror cell that ISIS had among their foreign cohort. Their specialism was to behead as many as possible.
These two females are the filth beyond filth, thankfully though UK British Pakistanis made up a tiny number of the vermin who went to fight with ISIS. The bulk are Arab, Bengali, converts and Somalis.
As for their situation sadly they can't be palmed off to anyone, it is the UK's problem and they will have to be bought back and hopefully jailed for life.
 
.
Hi,

Britain is an equal culprit as these women---. They british govt openly allowed the terrorist to recruit in britain---people like Anjum Ch had a free hand for years spreading hate amongst young muslim brits and then recruiting them for jihd---.


The brit govt did not stop it---because of freedom of speech---and the parents of these young men and women were crying out for help to arrest people like Anjum Ch and put him behind bars---.

In this case the brit govt should be charged with being accessory to the crime of allowing terrorism to prosper with the govt's permission---.
Simple , bcos they dont care until it affects them. There is a good reason why all criminals find protection in western countries bcos they cant break the laws there but can commit crimes in rest of the world. Western system has no values/principles just plain opportunists.
 
. . .
They shud adopt nationality of their husbands
 
.
Back
Top Bottom