What's new

Britain Considering Options in Response to Iran’s Seizure of Tanker

The SC

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
32,233
Reaction score
21
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
Sunday, 21 July, 2019 - 09:00
britain_is_looking_into_a_series_of_options_to_respond_to_irans_seizure_of_a_british-flagged_tanker._ap.jpeg

Britain is looking into a series of options to respond to Iran's seizure of a British-flagged tanker. (AP)

Asharq Al-Awsat

Britain is looking into a series of options to respond to Iran's seizure of a British-flagged tanker, junior defense minister Tobias Ellwood said on Sunday when asked whether London was considering putting sanctions on Tehran.

"Our first and most important responsibility is to make sure that we get a solution to the issue to do with the current ship, make sure other British-flagged ships are safe to operate in these waters and then look at the wider picture," he told Sky News.

Asked about the possibility of sanctions, he said: "We are going to be looking at a series of options … We will be speaking with our colleagues, our international allies, to see what can actually be done."

The Stena Impero was intercepted in the Strait of Hormuz late Friday by Iran's Revolutionary Guard forces.

The seizure prompted condemnation from the UK and its European allies as they continue to call for a de-escalation of tensions in the critical waterway.

UK Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt is expected to use a Commons statement on Sunday to announce a package of diplomatic and economic measures, including possible asset freezes, in response to the capture, reported the Telegraph on Saturday.

The UK could also push for European Union and United Nations sanctions to be reimposed on the Iranian regime after they were lifted in 2016 as part of a deal on its nuclear program, which saw billions of dollars of assets unfrozen and allowed the country's oil to be sold internationally.

Hunt said Saturday that Britain's response "will be considered but robust."

He said the ship's seizure shows worrying signs Iran may be choosing a dangerous and destabilizing path. He also defended the British-assisted seizure of Iran's supertanker two weeks ago as a "legal" move because the vessel was suspected of breaching European Union sanctions on oil shipments to Syria.

Iranian officials "see this as a tit-for-tat situation, following Grace 1 being detained in Gibraltar.

Nothing could be further from the truth," Hunt said later Saturday.


https://aawsat.com/english/home/art...dering-options-response-iran’s-seizure-tanker
 
What stops UK from releasing the Iranian tanker in order to secure the release of their tanker? It is very easy to resolve this issue if the Brits wants to take the easiest and quickest route. Perhaps they'll need some safe-facing steps and will then release the Iranian tanker first.

Or perhaps this is the excuse some needed for something much bigger than the oil tankers.
 
It is very easy to resolve this issue

The issue is not one ship. This indeed can easily be solved.

The issue is whether or not , Iran intends to disrupt marine traffic in the Golf.

Some people here seems to have a short memory , but in the recent weeks 6 ships " mysteriously " ran into trouble in the Golf. 2 Saudi , 2 Norwegian , one UAE and one Japaneses.

Only after that the British stopped the Iranian ship.


~
 
Last edited:
What stops UK from releasing the Iranian tanker in order to secure the release of their tanker? It is very easy to resolve this issue if the Brits wants to take the easiest and quickest route. Perhaps they'll need some safe-facing steps and will then release the Iranian tanker first.

Or perhaps this is the excuse some needed for something much bigger than the oil tankers.
It's about honore. Whole world will call Britain a cowerd country.
 
as expected England war ship HMS Montrose the escort Stena Impero oil tanker ran off and left the oil tanker to its own rather then come to its rescue

 
Well crews have nothing to do with politics, they just drive the ship. They should be allowed to go home.
They will be released anyways , crew has nothing to do with it. Indian government is in contact with Iran
 
The issue is not one ship. This indeed can easily be solved.

The issue is whether or not , Iran intends to disrupt marine traffic in the Golf.

Some people here seems to have a short memory , but in the recent weeks 6 ships " mysteriously " ran into trouble in the Golf. 2 Saudi , 2 Norwegian , one UAE and one Japaneses.

Only after that the British stopped the Iranian ship.


~
As you say it happened mysteriously and we don't knew who made those attacks.
 
The issue is not one ship. This indeed can easily be solved.

The issue is whether or not , Iran intends to disrupt marine traffic in the Golf.

Some people here seems to have a short memory , but in the recent weeks 6 ships " mysteriously " ran into trouble in the Golf. 2 Saudi , 2 Norwegian , one UAE and one Japaneses.

Only after that the British stopped the Iranian ship.


~


If UK wouldn't capture the tanker carrying Iranian oil and hold it, the current crisis wouldn't have existed. No one has given UK a mandate to capture Iranian tanker and enforce a blockade on Syria. The EU sanctions that UK cited are not applicable here as Iran isn't an EU member state.

With respect other ships, no one knows who carried out those attacks. For all intentions and purposes, it could be Israelis and others, or it could be Iran. Who carried out those attacks hasn't been confirmed.

The easiest way to solve it lift the blockade, release the Iranian ship, and then Iran should release the ship they're holding.
 
Well crews have nothing to do with politics, they just drive the ship. They should be allowed to go home.

so as Grace 1 tanker crews but they are detained too so we are not doing any thing that is worst then what UK is doing just a tit for tat.
 
Back
Top Bottom