@Zulkarneyn made a comment that a country with a name starting with 'C', ending with 'A' was
in his opinion responsible, and I just listed the alternatives. China happened to be one of them.
And no, Sweden is not causing any problems in the Middle East.
Sweden banned slavery like 800 years ago, and was one of the first countries banning ships from participating
in the Atlantic slave trade.
The colonial past of Sweden consisted of a small island, that was bought from France, then sold.
And again no, Sweden has not massacred jews, contrary to that, Sweden negotiated with Germany
at the end of WW2, and sent buses to rescue jews from Nazi concentration camps, bringing them to Sweden.
A Swedish diplomat, Raoul Wallenberg, issued a large number of passes to jews, allowing them to
escape from Nazi persecution.
As for caring about the human right of criminals, I stated the legal situation.
That is not for the benefit of the criminal, it is for the benefit of the victims.
I personally think there is a strong case for not giving the criminal any rights.
You entertain a racist mob mentality.
There is nothing hypocritical about using the term collateral damage.
Innocent civilians can be killed in three ways.
Killed in an attack on a target known to be purely civilian. This is a war crime.
Killed in an attack on a military target. This is Collateral Damage.
Killed in an attack on purely civilian target,
where the attacker has information indicating that the target has a military value. This is a mistake.
Your posting is pure racism, so I am putting You on ignore.