What's new

Breaking: IRGC seized a British tanker

I also don’t want to see a war . But US /UK
will impose a war if Iran want it or not .
Westerns breach JCPOA but they blaming Iran . UK sized Iranian Oil first not Iran escalate first . US steadily increasing its fire power, I think it is a sign of aggression, today or tomorrow they are going to attack Iran .
thats bad to see this when west os destroying muslim countries one by one
 
You want the Iranians to bow down like the Arabs?
Again, wishful thinking. 99% of military experts will agree with me from Russia to the US and in everywhere in between.
I'm German and Italian, they both bowed down to the US and I'm fine with it. They became better politically than during that time. Same goes for Iran.
 
Again, wishful thinking. 99% of military experts will agree with me from Russia to the US and in everywhere in between.
I'm German and Italian, they both bowed down to the US and I'm fine with it. They became better politically than during that time. Same goes for Iran.

Your post makes no sense

Are you asking for muslim countries to bow down endlessly to foreign powers?
 
Iran is a serious country and acts like a serious country should act...Brits should know that it is not 1953.

Also, whatever Naval force Britain has is small and not enough to deal with Iran in the Persian Gulf if anything.
Iran is a serious country and acts like a serious country should act...Brits should know that it is not 1953.

Also, whatever Naval force Britain has is small and not enough to deal with Iran in the Persian Gulf if anything.
Never underestimate a dead elephant. Till to date British Navy is highly capable.
 
Your post makes no sense

Are you asking for muslim countries to bow down endlessly to foreign powers?
I'm saying that it can be beneficial for some nations. Iran has a disagreeable leadership that could sure use an upgrade. Do you not agree? In a war with the west your leadership will fall apart even without a invasion. Bombing Tehran for a few weeks will end leadership as we know it.
 
Again, wishful thinking. 99% of military experts will agree with me from Russia to the US and in everywhere in between.
I'm German and Italian, they both bowed down to the US and I'm fine with it. They became better politically than during that time. Same goes for Iran.

Ghulam ibn Ghulam
 
Ghulam ibn Ghulam
So you don't agree that Germany and Italy needed new leadership? My Italian relatives served against them indirectly(Pacific) because they knew that fighting leadership is different than fighting the people themselves. I'm not going to respond to your shitty servant talk.
 
You want the Iranians to bow down like the Arabs?

Regimes in London and Washington want Iran to be weak and poor. Just look what US and English terrorists did to Iraq:
6a00d83451c45669e2012877905fb9970c-500wi.jpg


Terrorists from Washington not only destroyed Iraq but even founded terrorist organisation Daesh there.
 
they need every war ship that they can get they do not have alot of them so they are pulling them out of NATO so that they can use them to escort there tankers and not to get NATO involved if any thing happens.
Nato will still get involved I think. Article 5 makes it mandatory regardless of the boats apparent name.

NATO website...

  • Collective defence means that an attack against one Ally is considered as an attack against all Allies.
 
I'm saying that it can be beneficial for some nations. Iran has a disagreeable leadership that could sure use an upgrade. Do you not agree? In a war with the west your leadership will fall apart even without a invasion. Bombing Tehran for a few weeks will end leadership as we know it.

Not really

Muslim countries need to forge our own path

Not bow down to foreign powers who then impose a leadership made up of slaves upon a destroyed state

The arabs were dopes they made no weapon of quality to deter aggression against their states and were thus repeatedly humiliated
Today they are slaves

Iranians for all their restrictions have atleast forged ahead in making a variety of potent weapons

The U.S still has thousands of soldiers stuck in Afghanistan
Major U.S bases are well within Iranian reach
The Hormuz straits would be closed

Iran isnt some dickless arab country ergo whilst the U.K and U.S can bluster they know the consequences of war because iran can strike back
 
Not really

Muslim countries need to forge our own path

Not bow down to foreign powers who then impose a leadership made up of slaves upon a destroyed state

The arabs were dopes they made no weapon of quality to deter aggression against their states and were thus repeatedly humiliated
Today they are slaves

Iranians for all their restrictions have atleast forged ahead in making a variety of potent weapons

The U.S still has thousands of soldiers stuck in Afghanistan
Major U.S bases are well within Iranian reach
The Hormuz straits would be closed

Iran isnt some dickless arab country ergo whilst the U.K and U.S can bluster they know the consequences of war because iran can strike back
Who mentioned Arab countries m8? I am American by birth with mixed roots.

As I said before, most of your rant is false, and wishful thinking. Here you go...

Wishful thinking describes decision-making and the formation of beliefs based on what might be pleasing to imagine, rather than on evidence, rationality, or reality.
 
Back
Top Bottom