Breaking: Explosions, gunfire heard near Indian consulate in Jalalabad

[Psychic]

When USSR was forced to go, It was US which was helping rebels and wise a versa.

No you are incorrect.

 

[saiyan0321]

This is rubbish and ridiculous quite frankly. Just bcz it was an attack on an Indian consulate means it was Pakistan behind it. How about the consulate was located in jallabad which has been known to house terror networks while the eastern and southern side remains in conflict and control of the Taliban and india a staunch supporter of the afghan regime, which is considered apostate and wrong by the Taliban gets its consulate attacked. Its obvious the Taliban are behind the attack and why wouldn't they be. Didn't India give then four helicopters to be used against the Taliban. But no. Fingers are not pointed at the burning house but next door.

We are blamed before an event even happens. Karzai should make a statement stating the next five attacks will all be done by Pakistan and save himself the trouble of repeating the sane drivel each time

 

[litman]

Hatred by Indians is disgusting.

Mr. Karzai knew within hours of attack that it was Pakistan!? That fool did not know what is happening in his country even when he was the President. His rule was limited to his palace in Kabul. And what historical ties is he referring to? A question for Indians; do you feel proud that Afghans used to attack India? Let's start with Mehmood Ghaznavi!

actually karzae gets his training from india so he is also trained to blame on pak as soon as possible for every disaster in his country.

afghanistan is no doubt in india's grip and their foolish leaders can't understand. will india take a single afghan refugee?if yes, then we will more then happy to hand them over

 

[HariPrasad]

No you are incorrect.

You had no capabity to stand against the wrath of USSR that day or Russia today. Anyway you are the people who want to live in delusion. So enjoy your delusion. My good wishes.

 

[Spectre]

actually karzae gets his training from india so he is also trained to blame on pak as soon as possible for every disaster in his country.

afghanistan is no doubt in india's grip and their foolish leaders can't understand. will india take a single afghan refugee?if yes, then we will more then happy to hand them over

If what you say is true then it shows Pakistan in very poor light when it comes to managing it's neighbors and expertise of it's foreign corps and intelligence agencies in cultivating assets in a country right next door.

 

[Horatio]

He was from Ghazni. Question still stands. So I ask you again. How much do you love your brother Mehmood Ghaznavi? I'm waiting for your answer!

As much as I love Napoleon Bonaparte or Genghis Khan or the Hunnic horde Though apparently, you admittedly love him more than I do, if that was the whole point of your question, then I concede defeat. Regards.

 

[litman]

If what you say is true then it shows Pakistan in very poor light when it comes to managing it's neighbors and expertise of it's foreign corps and intelligence agencies in cultivating assets in a country right next door.

it's not very simple. when you are up against a super power (USA) in afghanistan and in addition to that you have the most spineless leadership in your country(musharraf+zardari+kiyani+nawaz) . as far as foreign policy is concerned there is no doubt we have history of failures.

 

[Psychic]

You had no capabity to stand against the wrath of USSR that day or Russia today. Anyway you are the people who want to live in delusion. So enjoy your delusion. My good wishes.

Please go ahead and check facts. We were in the game since 1975;years before USSR invaded Afghanistan.
The stingers and all that stuff came much later. And the US had no control over it's stingers once they came inside Pakistan---If you disagree than here's ex CIA chief for you:
Riedel: The war against the Soviets in Afghanistan was run by Zia, not by us | Foreign Policy

Funny thing is that a delusional is labeling others as delusional.

Now go ahead and blame us for supporting Haqqanis and so on as well--- as per your logic somehow now we are able to face the wrath of USA that's why we must be supporting these groups.

 

[Spectre]

it's not very simple. when you are up against a super power (USA) in afghanistan and in addition to that you have the most spineless leadership in your country(musharraf+zardari+kiyani+nawaz) . as far as foreign policy is concerned there is no doubt we have history of failures.

Eh! Aren't Pakistan and USA on the same side? Pakistan being a major non NATO Ally in Afghanistan.

@Desert Falcon

 

[HariPrasad]

Please go ahead and check facts. We were in the game since 1975;years before USSR invaded Afghanistan.
The stingers and all that stuff came much later. And the US had no control over it's stingers once they came inside Pakistan---If you disagree than here's ex CIA chief for you:
Riedel: The war against the Soviets in Afghanistan was run by Zia, not by us | Foreign Policy

Funny thing is that a delusional is labeling others as delusional.

Now go ahead and blame us for supporting Haqqanis and so on as well--- as per your logic somehow now we are able to face the wrath of USA that's why we must be supporting these groups.

Do you have the power to withstand Russia for a single day even in Today's date. You guys are taught so many BS which believe blindly. Russia would have wipped you out in single strike had US not been there.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

India is not on the peace table does not mean India is not involved.

First you claim that india should be involved in the peace process but it is not... Than you claim that india is involved in the peace process but off the table ...lol

We do provide moral, material and other back end support to afghan government and non taliban groups during the peace process and ensure they are not put to a disadvantage.

Moral and material support ? Lol.. To which factions? There are no anti Talib faction except ISIS and afghan govt (AKA NA)...

Taliban does not want to face people and elections but they want power.

Which elections?

Taliban may represent some pashtuns but NA is represented by all ethnics including pashtuns.

Taliban is entirely a Pashtun group which dominates entire southern Afghanistan...

NA massacres mot just Pashtuns but also eachother... Do you want me to quote examples now ?

Hamid Karzai, Ghani and Abdullah are all pashtuns and yet opposed to talibans

Karzai is a clown who accuses British of conspiring to kill him.. A corrupt sock puppet nobody trusted .. A low level idiot who rose from the job of an interpreter to the afghan president.

Ghani wants peace yet Tajik Abdullah Abdullah is pulling him back...

India's relations with all SAARC nations except Pakistan are very liberal and positive.

Just Q month back Nepal and before that Maldives accused India of for e ting trouble in their domestic affairs... So much for Indian bonhomie ..

Pakistan wants to give concessions to talibans on the negotiating table but India will ensure that they either face elections or remain shunted. By not being on negotiating table helps India pursue her stand more strongly. We are absolutely satisfied with our diplomatic efforts in Afghanistan and thats why our missions are under attack.

"Dil behlanay kou ghalib--
Yeh khayal bhi Acha hai-"


Welcome back to reality.

Taliban control most of Afghanistan.
ANA casualities and desertion rates are higher than ever.
US has stopped declaring Taliban "terrorists".
Iran is negotiating with Taliban.
Pak-Afghan relations are improving.
Pak is on the driving seat of the peace process..

Indian companies are pulling out of Afghanistan...
No roads to Kabul..
More Indian whining..

India is not on the peace table does not mean India is not involved.

First you claim that india should be involved in the peace process but it is not... Than you claim that india is involved in the peace process but off the table ...lol

We do provide moral, material and other back end support to afghan government and non taliban groups during the peace process and ensure they are not put to a disadvantage.

Moral and material support ? Lol.. To which factions? There are no anti Talib faction except ISIS and afghan govt (AKA NA)...

Taliban does not want to face people and elections but they want power.

Which elections?

Taliban may represent some pashtuns but NA is represented by all ethnics including pashtuns.

Taliban is entirely a Pashtun group which dominates entire southern Afghanistan...

NA massacres mot just Pashtuns but also eachother... Do you want me to quote examples now ?

Hamid Karzai, Ghani and Abdullah are all pashtuns and yet opposed to talibans

Karzai is a clown who accuses British of conspiring to kill him.. A corrupt sock puppet nobody trusted .. A low level idiot who rose from the job of an interpreter to the afghan president.

Ghani wants peace yet Tajik Abdullah Abdullah is pulling him back...

India's relations with all SAARC nations except Pakistan are very liberal and positive.

Just Q month back Nepal and before that Maldives accused India of for e ting trouble in their domestic affairs... So much for Indian bonhomie ..

Pakistan wants to give concessions to talibans on the negotiating table but India will ensure that they either face elections or remain shunted. By not being on negotiating table helps India pursue her stand more strongly. We are absolutely satisfied with our diplomatic efforts in Afghanistan and thats why our missions are under attack.

"Dil behlanay kou ghalib--
Yeh khayal bhi Acha hai-"


Welcome back to reality.

Taliban control most of Afghanistan.
ANA casualities and desertion rates are higher than ever.
US has stopped declaring Taliban "terrorists".
Iran is negotiating with Taliban.
Pak-Afghan relations are improving.
Pak is on the driving seat of the peace process..

Indian companies are pulling out of Afghanistan...
No roads to Kabul..
More Indian whining..

 

[Psychic]

Do you have the power to withstand Russia for a single day even in Today's date. You guys are taught so many BS which believe blindly. Russia would have wipped you out in single strike had US not been there.

^^^
Denial mode ON despite the rebuttal of his argument earlier.

 

[my2cents]

NATO and USSR also believed so.

They invaded their country and we invaded their heart. Know the difference.

 

[Psychic]

Why because most of them exist due to india in the first place ? Ironically all those countries where India player its proxy wars today despise her and her hegemony! And in no peace process did they involve india..



Had territory been some sort of caliber nations like Kazakhstan have more chances of bringing peace in Afghanistan due to shared religion,history and territorial closeness... Not india.. Which has no dog in the race... Minus sponsored terrorists using afghan soil.




Afghans welcomed the Taliban after they saw NA warlords and their attrocities first hand... Google videos of Afghans welcoming Taliban to Kabul in the 90s.... The Taliban govt was still better than the soviet supported genocidal commits or NA rapists.. or even the current setup comprising those same warlords.



Who butchered Pashtuns and even eachother? And are accused of massacres,rapes and looting ? The same ones that destroyed eachothers ethnic communities? That are numerically a minority ?



India supported the soviet invasion aswell... Than the brutal NA warlords who were defeated.. Faith lol... india supported then with money,weapons to kill others and a few airlifts to fakhor AB .. So much for support.. Several nations did that and most of them are talking to Taliban today... Iran the biggest supporter of NA is holding meetings with Taliban...




Are you going to beg for that now ? Are you going to beg PAK? or USA for a role ? There is a good reason India has never been invited in such summits or peace processes... Not just because it has no fish to fry but also because even Americans know indias support for terrorisim against Pak from afghan soil.

Pak controls Afghanistan in al isr all ways due to geography,history,shared ethnicity,religion and geo politics .. Like it or not..



China is a global power... It borders Afghanistan .. It has economic and social links with Afghanistan and also is Paks best buddy.. It has everything to do with what happens in Afghanistan..



Lol.. Had it been the case .. Iran not india (would have been representing NA (which officially doesn't exist -- because it's in power)....
NA is also condemned by international HR groups and UN for mass brutalities much worse than Taliban ....

As for terrorists .. Who are you to say that when US doesn't consider em that either ?


No substance just rants.


Please stop using afghan soil to co duct terrorist activities in Pak ?

These guys from across the border won't learn. Wait a couple of days and the same guys will be raising the same "points" again ...weak memory or perhaps stubbornness.

 

[litman]

They invaded their country and we invaded their heart. Know the difference.

its your dream. a common afghan will never accept india as closest friend. the difference in religion is huge issue. just remember what afghans did with the hindus and also remember why hindukush mountains were named as hindukush. it is only their corrupt and incompetent govt which is not even in full control of whole of afghanistan that is pro india. you can never win the minds and hearts of the common afghan. you need lot more media propaganda