What's new

BrahMos Storage Complex Under Construction in Halwara

Yakont AKA Brahmos is a non-nuclear C.M so no need to worry hence we have many short range Nuclear capable B.M and C.M.....


no worries.... we have counters....

@SQ8

They have already used Brahmos option (27/02) after soar-g-kal strikes to deter us further humiliating them.
They took them out but their movements were alerted to Pakistan because there was a satellite pointing at their facilities after intelligence came on their intentions. In turn Pakistan brought out Shaheen-I s and some unreliable sources say mated 1 in a “known” with a nuclear just in case so the message was conveyed to both them and the powers watching.
 
.
Therefore, Pakistan must fight on those terms
Why should Pakistan fight on those terms and not ours? Isn't this against the basic rules of fighting? where not fighting the enemy on its terms but rather forcing it to fight on ours. Just saying!
 
Last edited:
.
They took them out but their movements were alerted to Pakistan because there was a satellite pointing at their facilities after intelligence came on their intentions. In turn Pakistan brought out Shaheen-I s and some unreliable sources say mated 1 in a “known” with a nuclear just in case so the message was conveyed to both them and the powers watching.
They have fired at abandoned nuclear facilities. "2" as per off course rumors.
 
.
It seems totally a one sided story...

During the tense situation or premature war time...

India will be deployed other SAM solution around the borders... Also, will deploy long range rockets - 90 km...

Will be monitored military movement and might india will take action and will surprise as same as 1965 war (opened other fronts as it was not expected by PAK military planners)....

So basically like cricket, other bowling unit do planning against the best Batman of opponent but other player can surprise might you.. Here, people talk about S400 but forget about other SAM systems...
 
.
Why should Pakistan fight on those terms and not ours? Isn't this against the basic rules of fighting? where not fighting the enemy on its terms but rather forcing it to fight on ours. Just saying!

Pakistan don't and it doesn't from what I read.

Pakistan has more nuclear warheads and better ballistic missiles. Even in tactical mode, Pakistan has low yield neutron bombs which India doesn't have. The neutron device option is far more debilitating to Indian policy planning than a hyped up cruise missile is to Pakistan's.
 
.
It seems totally a one sided story...

During the tense situation or premature war time...

India will be deployed other SAM solution around the borders... Also, will deploy long range rockets - 90 km...

Will be monitored military movement and might india will take action and will surprise as same as 1965 war (opened other fronts as it was not expected by PAK military planners)....

So basically like cricket, other bowling unit do planning against the best Batman of opponent but other player can surprise might you.. Here, people talk about S400 but forget about other SAM systems...
Lols surprise element always with us....


1641887342386.jpeg




maxresdefault.jpg
 
.
Pakistan don't and it doesn't from what I read.

Pakistan has more nuclear warheads and better ballistic missiles. Even in tactical mode, Pakistan has low yield neutron bombs which India doesn't have. The neutron device option is far more debilitating to Indian policy planning than a hyped up cruise missile is to Pakistan's.

India does not need tactical nuclear missile... Our policy is very clear if single tactical missile will fire on indian Army then response will be couple of nuclear missiles.... Means, nuclear war..... I don't understand about better once by the way....

Supersonic Cruise missiles have several advantages... Especially, it is not very easy to protect against these missiles including Chinese, they are also vulnerable against it..
 
.
India does not need tactical nuclear missile... Our policy is very clear if single tactical missile will fire on indian Army then response will be couple of nuclear missiles.... Means, nuclear war..... I don't understand about better once by the way....

Supersonic Cruise missiles have several advantages... Especially, it is not very easy to protect against these missiles including Chinese, they are also vulnerable against it..
We have the same policy omelette...
 
.
Lols surprise element always with us....


View attachment 807725



maxresdefault.jpg

Biggest Surprise in ind vs pak war incidents are :

1. 1965 - opened other fronts and forced to save lahore and forget about kashmir.
2. 1971 - indian missiles boat attack at Karachi and sunk few ship's.
3. 1984 - Siachen (Operation Meghdoot)

2019 is nothing compared to these..
 
.
Biggest Surprise in ind vs pak war incidents are :

1. 1965 - opened other fronts and forced to save lahore and forget about kashmir.
2. 1971 - indian missiles boat attack at Karachi and sunk few ship's.
3. 1984 - Siachen (Operation Meghdoot)

2019 is nothing compared to these..
1948?
1999?

Memory loss?
 
.
1948?
1999?

Memory loss?

What happened in 1948? Ohh i remeber, India got approx 65℅ of Jammu & kashmir after fighting with Pakistan......

Well, India lost to China in 1962- Akshai chin... That is Seperate debate... But won approx 65℅ in 1948....

1999 - A biggest blunder in Pakistan history... What was the objective? To force India to make a deal on siachen and kashmir with Pakistan....

But ended with what results? If forced Nawaz sharif to flew USA and asked for help..
 
Last edited:
.
Pakistan has more nuclear warheads and better ballistic missiles. Even in tactical mode, Pakistan has low yield neutron bombs which India doesn't have. The neutron device option is far more debilitating to Indian policy planning than a hyped up cruise missile is to Pakistan's.
Low yield neutron bombs... LOL! Pakistan has not even tested a boosted warhead.
 
.
India does not need tactical nuclear missile... Our policy is very clear if single tactical missile will fire on indian Army then response will be couple of nuclear missiles.... Means, nuclear war..... I don't understand about better once by the way....

Supersonic Cruise missiles have several advantages... Especially, it is not very easy to protect against these missiles including Chinese, they are also vulnerable against it..

If they were such an advantage you would have used some in February, 2019. Instead you sent planes who hit some crows and then lost a plane and had a prisoner taken in front of a global audience. Where was the Brahmos after 40 Indians were killed at Pulwana? The US used Tomahawks in large numbers on land targets. Brahmos is supposedly better so where was it?

The Brahmos was never used because firing one might mean a tactical nuke or worse in reply. Also, Russian components mean you have a limited supply of this missile.

It is not a flexible weapon that India can fire at will.
 
.
If they were such an advantage you would have used some in February, 2019. Instead you sent planes who hit some crows and then lost a plane and had a prisoner taken in front of a global audience. Where was the Brahmos after 40 Indians were killed at Pulwana? The US used Tomahawks in large numbers on land targets. Brahmos is supposedly better so where was it?
It was a gong show for election gains. Indian government was in no mood for a military action, but they needed to do something. So they did it. Just enough for public to rejoice. Pakistan returned the favour in form of bombs with no fuse. Abhinandan went for kill alone and got shot down while his wingmen went cold. Pakistani military and civilian leadership was so scared that they returned him immediately while serving him a cup of tea.
 
.
Low yield neutron bombs... LOL! Pakistan has not even tested a boosted warhead.

In May 1998, Senior Pakistani Scientist, Dr. N. M. Butt, stated that "PAEC built a sufficient number of neutron bombs— a battlefield weapon that is essentially a low yield device".

Far more substantial than Indian claims of Brahmos being some super cruise missile. Impact on Indian policy would be far greater than the Brahmos' on Pakistan's.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom