Bollywood actress Priyanka Chopra meets Rohingyas in Bangladesh

[Homo Sapiens]

I'm actually glad atleast you're changing your rhetoric from absolute denial of violence from the Rohingya's to now asking me not to compare the wider Rohingya population with their militant representatives.See you cant hide these stuff for long, They eventually come through the propaganda

I have never claimed that Rohingyas did not commit any violence in the past. Show me any proof where I said that?
During ww2 and in 1950s Rohingyas fought with rakhine nationalist extremist and burmese army.That was Rohingya's legitimate armed struggle to live in their homeland with security and peace against the enemy who wanted them to drive away from northern Arakan.

 

[Homo Sapiens]

As it stands Burma is not going to accept millions of them back from Bangladesh and by each passing month with more credible information coming through about Rohingya atrocities towards the Rakhine, Whatever International support that remain will wane as is had already begun to happen, So the best thing for them is to settle back in Bangladesh where they were from or the likes of the UN and OIC (If they're even interested) to settle them in countries culturally similar to what they are looking for

Nobody ask your unsolicited advice on what is best for Rohingyas and Bangladesh.Relevant parties, UN, OIC, USA, EU, China, India, Bangladesh all agree that Rohingyas have to go back to their home in northern Arakan. We understand that, it is a long bitter struggle against burmese junta. But we are ready to face of it. Even the burmese junta has no courage to deny Rohingya repatriation. That's why those rats are staging phony repatriation drama.

I understand your desperation of saving the a*s of burmese junta from the world opinion. After all you and burmese share a lot of similar concerns. You also have ''problem'' with non buddhist Tamil, Muslim etc. Your buddist extremist bodu bala sena maintain close link with burmese buddhist extremist organization ma ba tha.You @Gibbs are brother in arms of buddist extremism/nationalism with burmese buddhist extremists.

See the VIP treatment burmese anti-muslim buddhist extremist Ashin Wirathu got in bodu bala sena(BBS) conference in Sri Lanka

 

[Species]

I shall respond whenever it deem fit for me

You have done this in another thread as well i.e. fleeing the discussion when you have been countered, and I bet if I haven't said that you wouldn't even have returned this time as well.

Now if you want to belittle sources provided to counter your argument that can be done by me as well, If you prefer to go down that road.. What makes you think your narrative and sources are more credible than the alternative ones that does not agree with yours ?

It's a research ethic to properly cite a source so that the reader could verify the claim. What you did was, inserted a link to an obscure book that is not even accessible, neither you provided any page number nor a screenshot. I doubt you even read that book rather just put up a link whatever google fed you. That's how trolls try to win an argument.

In my post, I clearly mentioned the page number, the source and also inserted the link which is easily accessible.

According to that personal research paper you have posted it is said that the Rohingya language have been found to be in existing in North Western parts of Arakan pre colonial times, Which is plausible given Rohingya are from the Chittagong areas's bordering this region but that doesnt prove that the masses now claiming to be rohingya inhabited that area pre colonial times

Lol, you rock with your logic.

So we have got evidence that English Language existed in England for more than a thousand years but according to your logic that doesn't mean that every person claiming to be an Englishman is native to England.

The argument was that the community called 'Rohingya' existed in Arakan since long before the arrival of the British, that makes the Rohingya community native to Arakan. You on the other hand argued that Rohingyas are all migrants during the British Raj, which has just been countered.

Infact it's as recent as the 1920's that mass migrations of British Indian subjects from Bengal region were transplanted over night to Burmese territories more specifically to Rakhine.. Records show that 428,300 Bengalis arrived in 1927 alone.. Just imagine the numbers before and after.. Vast majority of these people now claim to be Rohingya.. So It’s time to end the Rohingya insurgency for good, stop the recurring humanitarian crises, and close off western Burma permanently as a potential gateway. Whatever the fate of the few hundred thousand Rohingya still remaining in Burma, the international community should stop setting its hair on fire and focus on doing what it does best: help resettle the Rohingya refugees to countries where they can have a real future.

https://escholarship.org/uc/item/24c1m8gj

The migrants from Bengal and the entire British India were mainly employed in Rangoon and Upper Burma, where all the industries were located. Arakan was not an industrial area, neither had any major agricultural production.

Plus, Arakan had been an extension of Bengal Sultanate, using the same currency and receiving substantial cultural influence, they only became independent of Bengal during the Mughal era. The existence of a large population of Indo-Aryan Muslims in Arakan is only natural. A number of places in Rakhine also bear Muslim names. Besides, as I said earlier, the Rohingyas were full citizens of Burma before 1982, proving their claim to their native land in Arakan. It's only the military rule in Burma that stripped them off their Burmese citizenship, just to play divide and rule politics as the Burmese military is playing in the entire country to solidify their position.

Secret 1978 Document Indicates Burma Recognized Rohingya Legal Residence

Anyway, here as well, you didn't provide any specific page number to prove your stats rather just inserted a link as you did earlier. I tried to find what you are claiming in that link and couldn't verify. So as I suspected earlier, you are just trying to falsify the sources like a cheap troll to win the argument.

I had a good discussion with @Godman, we agreed on certain matters while disagreed on others. I would take his posts as the general observation of Sri Lankans on this matter. You, otoh, are a Islamophobe troll and would be ignored as such.

 

[Doctor Strange]

This crisis didnt start a decade ago, It started in 1948 when a minority in the country but a majority in the neighboring country demanded separation from a newly independent sovereign nation, Started by violence against the native people of the region.. But now after retaliation from the sovereign state cries foul.. Can you see the parallels ?

http://www.asiantribune.com/node/90999

@Gibbs You are just a troll, naive, bias person, spreading nonsense.
The problem started in 1942, when Rohingyas were attacked by combined Japanese and Burmese forces. The Japanese introduced kill all, burn all method which is still feared and practiced by Burma.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arakan_massacres_in_1942
Rohingyas felt threatened to join newly created Burma and predicted the fate they are going through now. I dont see what they did was a bad attempt to escape misery. And unlike Srilanka, the Southern Chittagong and North Arakan is a continuous land border. Its really not easy to define who is a native and non native there. It makes sense in bordering areas people of both kinds will remain side by side. Its really pathetic to see your heinous agenda on those oppressed people. What I can say is just buzz off.

 

[Nilgiri]

Most of the Srilankan Tamil still want independence and fought against Sri lanka just a few years ago.

Complete idiotic statement. Colombo is majority/near majority tamil city. Just like Istanbul is near majority kurdish.

You are not Tamil nor you speak a word of it...bugger off about things you know zero about. Most SL Tamils do not want independence....at most majority want some form of federal autonomy...and enshrined bilingual status for the country....they have largely achieved both now by negotiation (which should have been the process all along)....and things are much more peaceable now and getting better. Remove the Vatican induced poison that LTTE was addicted to...and chauvinist domineering principles of elitists on both sides.... and brotherhood is again formed over time.

It does not give justification to kill or deport entire Tamil population to India by Sri Lankan forces either.

That never was an objective. In fact SL has given citizenship to even the Tamil Kandy plantation workers, which were very recent migrants to SL from TN. Forget about any objective like you say regarding Jaffna Tamils and Moors who's presence stretch back centuries and millenia.

"Entire" Tamil population is again such a fallacy being spouted by you. The issue was always (for deportation) the most recent Tamil migrant populations under British Raj (which started to happen early on under agreement between India and SL...but later slowed and stopped as the conflict eventually started)....and whether to have bilingual + autonomous federated system in the country for politics. Nowhere did Sinhalese elite push for deportation of entire Tamil population, not even close to it. Why the conflict started was lot more complex.

@HeinzG @Godman

 

[UKBengali]

Complete idiotic statement. Colombo is majority/near majority tamil city. Just like Istanbul is near majority kurdish.

You are not Tamil nor you speak a word of it...bugger off about things you know zero about. Most SL Tamils do not want independence....at most majority want some form of federal autonomy...and enshrined bilingual status for the country....they have largely achieved both now by negotiation (which should have been the process all along)....and things are much more peaceable now and getting better. Remove the Vatican induced poison that LTTE was addicted to...and chauvinist domineering principles of elitists on both sides.... and brotherhood is again formed over time.

We really saw that "brotherhood" with the killings of 40,000 Hindu Tamils at the hands of the Sinhalese Buddhists in 2009.

 

[Gibbs]

@Gibbs You are just a troll, naive, bias person, spreading nonsense.
The problem started in 1942, when Rohingyas were attacked by combined Japanese and Burmese forces. The Japanese introduced kill all, burn all method which is still feared and practiced by Burma.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arakan_massacres_in_1942
Rohingyas felt threatened to join newly created Burma and predicted the fate they are going through now. I dont see what they did was a bad attempt to escape misery. And unlike Srilanka, the Southern Chittagong and North Arakan is a continuous land border. Its really not easy to define who is a native and non native there. It makes sense in bordering areas people of both kinds will remain side by side. Its really pathetic to see your heinous agenda on those oppressed people. What I can say is just buzz off.

Cry me a river.. The problem started at the start of the 20th century when mass migrations of Bengali's basically invaded Northern Rakhine state with the auspicious of British India, They over time they created a identity for themselves calling themselves Rohingya for obvious reasons.. This is a common phenomena around the world in many British colonies from Malaya to Fiji and South Africa to Sri Lanka, Where they shifted millions of indentured labor from the Indian sub continent.. Rohingya are far from oppressed people that you would like to potray to the world, They started this conflict with violence against the native Rakhines and now cry foul when finally the Burmese retaliated

Lol.. You have no authority to ask me to buzz off kid, Delusions of grandeur have become very strong in this section of the forum lately..

I have never claimed that Rohingyas did not commit any violence in the past. Show me any proof where I said that?
During ww2 and in 1950s Rohingyas fought with rakhine nationalist extremist and burmese army.That was Rohingya's legitimate armed struggle to live in their homeland with security and peace against the enemy who wanted them to drive away from northern Arakan

Try and remember what you write and what you stand for here after..

Atrocity from Rohingya side? What bullshit you are smoking?

You @Gibbs are brother in arms of buddist extremism/nationalism with burmese buddhist extremists.

Oh please !!! You're barking up a wrong tree This religious bias BS never stick with me, People who know my background can vouch for this.. @Godman @Nilgiri @nair .. The world is becoming one hell of a cluster feck is because of religious nut cases with superiority complex and seeing every damn thing through a religious prism

You have done this in another thread as well i.e. fleeing the discussion when you have been countered, and I bet if I haven't said that you wouldn't even have returned this time as well.

Dont over estimate yourself, You're a non entity as far as i regard when and what i will post in online forums..

It's a research ethic to properly cite a source so that the reader could verify the claim. What you did was, inserted a link to an obscure book that is not even accessible, neither you provided any page number nor a screenshot. I doubt you even read that book rather just put up a link whatever google fed you. That's how trolls try to win an argument.

I wont be spood feeding you, I assume you're capable of reading through research papers as you have also painfully posted such

The argument was that the community called 'Rohingya' existed in Arakan since long before the arrival of the British, that makes the Rohingya community native to Arakan. You on the other hand argued that Rohingyas are all migrants during the British Raj, which has just been countered

No i did'nt.. May be this is where your comprehension skills failed you, All i said was given the porous nature of the region it's entirely plausible that so called Rohingya existed in the region prior to colonization, But the current millions of them claiming to be Rohingya are mainly those Bengali migrants that were transplanted by the Brits at the turn of the century, Totally devastating natural demographics of the Rakine over night

You, otoh, are a Islamophobe troll and would be ignored as such.

Lol.. No worries, I have seen this trend before when confronted with facts, It's easier to ignore and pretend it does not exist.. The CGI bloke promised the same.. @Nilgiri .. Hope you keep to your word mate.. G'day

 

[Aung Zaya]

I understand your desperation of saving the a*s of burmese junta from the world opinion. After all you and burmese share a lot of similar concerns. You also have ''problem'' with non buddhist Tamil, Muslim etc.

the problem in this case is that illegal immigrants from bangladesh made choas in arakan. i dont care which religion they believed in. so the problem is you guys who loved to drag the religion in every problems.u should fix ur own first.

The argument was that the community called 'Rohingya' existed in Arakan since long before the arrival of the British, that makes the Rohingya community native to Arakan. You on the other hand argued that Rohingyas are all migrants during the British Raj, which has just been countered.

lol even the word " Rohingya " was invented in 1960s. how come they are the native of arakan ? so let me know what happened to the hundred of thousand of bangali who were taken by british ?

 

[Doctor Strange]

Cry me a river.. The problem started at the start of the 20th century when mass migrations of Bengali's basically invaded Northern Rakhine state with the auspicious of British India, They over time they created a identity for themselves calling themselves Rohingya for obvious reasons.. This is a common phenomena around the world in many British colonies from Malaya to Fiji and South Africa to Sri Lanka, Where they shifted millions of indentured labor from the Indian sub continent.. Rohingya are far from oppressed people that you would like to potray to the world, They started this conflict with violence against the native Rakhines and now cry foul when finally the Burmese retaliated

Lol.. You have no authority to ask me to buzz off kid, Delusions of grandeur have become very strong in this section of the forum lately..

Idiot, before the start of 20th century there were no Bengali identity to begin with. People from Bengal to be more precise. Its Hindus who started to identify themselves as Bengali at the start of 20th century, when East Bengal and West Bengal was divided, East Bengal+Assam province was created. Muslims used to identify themselves as Muslims/Muhammadan. Hindus also had many sub identities and still identify Bengalis who practice Puja culture. Many Muslims still have problems to identify themselves as Bengalis until recently. And Arakan was ruled from Kolkata under British rule. Its obvious many people had moved in this common domain. What is your problem? East Bengalis later started to identify themselves as Bengali after the creation of East Pakistan. Rohingyas can also relate to their area Arakan/Rakhine and call themselves Rohingya. Even Rakhine people started to call themselves Rakhine during 1920. These ethnic identity derivations are grossly vague. You are just a delusional ugly kid with no knowledge of ground realities, but just making fuss out of nothing. Even your Sinhalese buddies hate you because of your level of idiocy. Its height of nonsense from a guy who was expelled from Srilanka because of his Burger identity because some Dutch people fcked local Sinhalese. South Chittagong and Northern Arakan is a continuous land area upto Sittwe/Akyab. It makes sense they will be heavily seen in those areas. I agree people of Indian origin went to Yangon but sent back by Burma. But Rohingyas are native, if not why did Burma accepted them during the creation of Burma? Even if some people went there during the British time, why would BD take their 5th or 6th generation. Do you think world works that way? Im not interested to discuss about thousands years of history but what was the situation during these boundaries were created. The people left on the other side of border, they should just remain that way. Its between international communities, Burma and Rohingyas to decide where they belong. I cant just fathom your problem. After sending 90% of them inside BD, killing and raping thousands of them, what more do you wish for your pleasure purpose. Do you shag at night thinking of these atrocities? Man you are a just maniac hovering around in random online forums for pleasure with these odd things. Even if countless sources/facts are sent at your way nobody can convince you. So why wont you take a hike where you are welcome.

 

[Homo Sapiens]

Try and remember what you write and what you stand for here after..

I have already said recent killing of some Hindus may have done by ARSA terrorists(although ARSA denied after Amnesty report coming in, we can not be 100 percent sure that hindu killing was done obviously by ARSA as there is no scope now to cross interrogation of those terrorists.It can be ARSA or rakhine militias or some other forces. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-myanmar-rohingya/rohingya-insurgents-reject-amnesty-report-on-hindu-villagers-killed-in-myanmar-idUSKCN1IQ22E) who are working for burmese junta.They don't represent Rohingya people. Vast majority of Rohingya civilian hate ARSA. In 1940s and 1950s, Rohingyas had legitimate resistance force who enjoyed popular support. They fought against rakhine extremist,nationalists and burmese forces and casualties happened on both sides.But what now is happening is one sided massacre done by burmese forces.My that statement was for current situation not for history.

 

[Homo Sapiens]

Oh please !!! You're barking up a wrong tree This religious bias BS never stick with me, People who know my background can vouch for this.. @Godman @Nilgiri @nair .. The world is becoming one hell of a cluster feck is because of religious nut cases with superiority complex and seeing every damn thing through a religious prism

I know the thinking of your kinds, buddhist can never be religious extremist no matter how much they harbour anti-muslim sentiment, justify killing or deportation of Rohingya muslim or Tamil hindus whatever,whenever suit them, supporting creation of buddhist chauvinistic state in burma and Sri Lanka. Only Muslim can be extremist. The nice guy like Ashin Wirathu or their Sri Lankan equivalents are peace loving buddhist angels. If burmese army(99 percent buddist) kill muslim or Christian ethnic group with the ideology of buddhist nationalism to purify burma from other religion it can not be termed as buddist extremism. As ''buddist can never be extremist'' the mantra we learned.So no matter how much you hold prejudice against muslim or hate muslim or want non buddhist group out of burma and Sri lanka, you are peace loving buddhist angel.

the problem in this case is that illegal immigrants from bangladesh made choas in arakan. i dont care which religion they believed in. so the problem is you guys who loved to drag the religion in every problems.u should fix ur own first.

Do you want to say, Rohingya persecution has nothing to do with religion? If Rohingyas were buddhist, still such outcome would have happened? If you do not look at religion, then why are you denying citizenship to Rohingyas despite living in northern Arakan for many generations while enticing Bangladeshi buddhist with citizenship, land and rations to go and settle in Burma?
Myanmar lures Bangladesh Buddhists to take over Rohingya land: Officials
https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/s...uddhists-to-take-over-rohingya-land-officials

 

[Aung Zaya]

while enticing Bangladeshi buddhist with citizenship, land and rations to go and settle in Burma?
Myanmar lures Bangladesh Buddhists to take over Rohingya land: Officials
https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/s...uddhists-to-take-over-rohingya-land-officials

lol that's just idiotic claim by a Bangladeshi official. not from Myanmar side. there is not such an easy case to get the citizenship and there is no such an official declaration by gov.use ur brain.may be local rakhine people spreading propagenda by using their relatives in BD side to meet their human resource needs to compete with outnumbered Rohingya.We just accepted the victims of temple attack fled from Bangladesh last a few years ago and they are still in refugee status.

 

[Gibbs]

Its height of nonsense from a guy who was expelled from Srilanka because of his Burger identity because some Dutch people fcked local Sinhalese.

Lol.. Do you really want to go there bub ? Do you really want me to list the people who have fecked your women and who continues to do so even today ? Take guess.. You're real father would probably be pulling a rickshaw in Culcutta

https://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/04/01/more-women-are-being-traf_n_9588790.html

Refrain from personal abuse if you do not want to get exposed for what you really are

Even if countless sources/facts are sent at your way nobody can convince you.

Like wise there are countless facts and sources denouncing Bengali propaganda, I'm afraid wont count to brainwashed simpletons either

Do you shag at night thinking of these atrocities?

Keep your sexual fantasies to yourself, No one cares cos this is a political forum, Stop getting your panties in a twist and learn to discuss subject matter without resorting to profanity.. If thats too much to ask from semi literates i dont know

before the start of 20th century there were no Bengali identity to begin with. People from Bengal to be more precise. Its Hindus who started to identify themselves as Bengali at the start of 20th century, when East Bengal and West Bengal was divided, East Bengal+Assam province was created. Muslims used to identify themselves as Muslims/Muhammadan.

Doesn't matter in the current context, Rohingya are by large illegal Bengali's/Muhammdan/ People from Bengal but most importantly recent masses from over populated Current day Bangladesh.. Capisch ?

The facts remains, These Bengali migrants never wanted integration in the first place, It was they who started violence against native Rakhine and continues to make militant attacks through the decades untill the establishment and the wider Rakhine population decided to hit back.. In a civil conflict it's always the innocents that end up suffering Women and Children the most, So it happens to be with the Rohingya as well, But fat luck you provoke now they have to face the consequences

There's little much Bangladeshi's like you and your coterie can do , Except cry blue murder on online forums and scream profanity at others who have differing views, Just shows the background of gutter upbringing quite literally..

Myanmar will not accept back these people even if they force them back they will be going back to their death bed's, World is slowly seeing through the propaganda as well, Support even among the OIC nations that use the religious card all the time are on the wane.. Bollywood actress can do so much other than make a sad face and pose for the camera', Neither India nor anyone else will change their stance.. Ask the Malaysians what they think of the Rohingya Who they now call Bengali's, Ironically.. You'll be surprised

So the best way out of this is let them settle in Bangladesh where they belong or absorb them in to countries where they can happily live according to the lifestyle they wish to

I know the thinking of your kinds, buddhist can never be religious extremist no matter how much they harbour anti-muslim sentiment, justify killing or deportation of Rohingya muslim or Tamil hindus whatever,whenever suit them, supporting creation of buddhist chauvinistic state in burma and Sri Lanka. Only Muslim can be extremist. The nice guy like Ashin Wirathu or their Sri Lankan equivalents are peace loving buddhist angels. If burmese army(99 percent buddist) kill muslim or Christian ethnic group with the ideology of buddhist nationalism to purify burma from other religion it can not be termed as buddist extremism. As ''buddist can never be extremist'' the mantra we learned.So no matter how much you hold prejudice against muslim or hate muslim or want non buddhist group out of burma and Sri lanka, you are peace loving buddhist angel.

Again barking up the wrong tree bub, You people keep making it a religious conflict to suit your warped ideology, When it's really a conflict of Ethno/nationalistic and a crisis about territorial integrity

But it does'nt matter to me either way you calling Buddhist terrorists or others claiming Islamic extremism

 

[Godman]

I know the thinking of your kinds, buddhist can never be religious extremist no matter how much they harbour anti-muslim sentiment, justify killing or deportation of Rohingya muslim or Tamil hindus whatever,whenever suit them, supporting creation of buddhist chauvinistic state in burma and Sri Lanka. Only Muslim can be extremist. The nice guy like Ashin Wirathu or their Sri Lankan equivalents are peace loving buddhist angels. If burmese army(99 percent buddist) kill muslim or Christian ethnic group with the ideology of buddhist nationalism to purify burma from other religion it can not be termed as buddist extremism. As ''buddist can never be extremist'' the mantra we learned.So no matter how much you hold prejudice against muslim or hate muslim or want non buddhist group out of burma and Sri lanka, you are peace loving buddhist angel.

He ain't Buddhist though
He as well as every single Sri Lankan in this forum are strongly against organizations like the Bodu Bala Sena.
So bringing that up is not going to send this thread anywhere

 

[Doctor Strange]

Lol.. Do you really want to go there bub ? Do you really want me to list the people who have fecked your women and who continues to do so even today ? Take guess.. You're real father would probably be pulling a rickshaw in Culcutta

https://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/04/01/more-women-are-being-traf_n_9588790.html

Refrain from personal abuse if you do not want to get exposed for what you really are

Coming rich from a bustard child of dutch Thanks for your concern, nobody asked opinion of a burger busterd. I have my family trace, couldnt care about rickshaw pullers.

Keep your sexual fantasies to yourself, No one cares cos this is a political forum, Stop getting your panties in a twist and learn to discuss subject matter without resorting to profanity.. If thats too much to ask from semi literates i dont know

Ohh burgerstard, Im unlike you average joe semi literate. Im afraid you are making mistake. Your knowledge level tells lot about you. You have started to spread fallacies by tracing the root problem to 1948 but infact it started from 1942. Garage mechanic like you couldnt come out with anything better.

Doesn't matter in the current context, Rohingya are by large illegal Bengali's/Muhammdan/ People from Bengal but most importantly recent masses from over populated Current day Bangladesh.. Capisch ?

If they are current day illegal population, I've no problem to accept them. But which insane person will go to that slaughter house knowing the situation there? Maybe insane people like you. The problem is with British Indian population. Bangladesh is neither British India, nor Bengal, nor East Pakistan. Though these people are coming here for 70 years and migrating to other parts of the world and degrading law and order there.

The facts remains, These Bengali migrants never wanted integration in the first place, It was they who started violence against native Rakhine and continues to make militant attacks through the decades untill the establishment and the wider Rakhine population decided to hit back.. In a civil conflict it's always the innocents that end up suffering Women and Children the most, So it happens to be with the Rohingya as well, But fat luck you provoke now they have to face the consequences

Why do you deliberately call them Bengali when they identify themselves as Rohingya. If Bengali people now associate themselves with moon, wont you relate them with moon? Nothing better can be expected from a pervert like you.

There's little much Bangladeshi's like you and your coterie can do , Except cry blue murder on online forums and scream profanity at others who have differing views, Just shows the background of gutter upbringing quite literally..

Myanmar will not accept back these people even if they force them back they will be going back to their death bed's, World is slowly seeing through the propaganda as well, Support even among the OIC nations that use the religious card all the time are on the wane.. Bollywood actress can do so much other than make a sad face and pose for the camera', Neither India nor anyone else will change their stance.. Ask the Malaysians what they think of the Rohingya Who they now call Bengali's, Ironically.. You'll be surprised

So the best way out of this is let them settle in Bangladesh where they belong or absorb them in to countries where they can happily live according to the lifestyle they wish to

Nobody asked your opinion. You are just a bystander. Matured International communities will take suitable steps. I couldnt care about Rohingyas as they are not citizens of Bangladesh. Do you even understand how people obtain citizenships naturally? Oww you are burgarstard ship loaded to australia from srilalnka to have a different identity overnight. Soo sad please go back to the gutter you came from.