Take anything from GDP growth, debt, poverty, aid dependancy, FDI, tax collection to birth rate, infant mortality rate, sanitation: Khaleda and Hasina have transformed us from a total basmet case to an emerging economic power.
Both Zia and Mujib were overrated politicians with unbelievable lack of leadership skills and awareness.
But why you are taking the name of khaleda zia ? Yes I admit about Hasina. she is much better than anyone . But what khaleda zia had done except raising her , and her famly and friend's bank account? Were you in bangladesh during 2001-2006?Some say that it was even worse than Bakshal regime in many cases .
But yes 1996-2001 hasina regime was much better comparing previous other regime, all price was under controlled even market was stable more than her current regime .
And now she is doing better than her past time in many cases I admit . But what actually make khaleda zia better than his husband can you explain please ? And she even tried to stop one Eid bonus for govt employees , later changed her mind for the public protest .
And about child mortality rate , presently medical science is much more developed comparing old days , various strong antibiotics are introduced , and many modern technologies are available , so why we should give credit to our present day leaders ? Or are you just trying to create a balance so wrote the name of Khaleda zia?
But yes I always admit other than exaggeration , Hasina actually try to do something for the nation .And khaleda lacks every quality of leadership.
And now about Mujib and Zia .
look bhai , when zia grab power , he survived few times only and that was not enough to do any good work IMHO . But he atleast tried to recover something . In international politics he also had some good activities . So if was probably a good administrator , if not a good leader . On the other hand , he gave colonel taher death penalty who was actually his savior , because Taher could be a threat to him .I think his administrative skill was far superior to others .
Although I do not count as a great leader .
on the other hand sheikh Mujib was a really great leader , who lack administrative skills , he thought that his peoples will not harm him , and also he failed to control his party mobs who were creating chaos all over the country . If he was a good administrator , he should have punished ,most of his party members . Sadly he failed to do that .
However I could be wrong in my analysis regarding Mujib and Zia , because I was born after their regime .
But probably I am right about Khaleda and Hasina regime . And I found no good in khaleda regime instead of calling Awami league as team of Hindus , and celebrating 15 august as her bday and celebrating nazat day when hasina resigned in 2001 . All are just BS from Khaleda zia , immature behavior from the shrew !
On the other hand in 1996 hasina set a milestone by making Shahabuddin Ahmed as president . (But yes I am telling the truth so i will be tagged a die hard Awami fan again , as already tagged as BNP to even crypto jamati lol; but I do not care those imbeciles ), and now Hasina has already solved most of problems created by khaleda zia .
So now you can claim that Hasina is a good administrator and also a good leader , but their is no way to take the name of Khaleda zia .
Now an off topic message that I need to tell , once I vowed that if Hasina can successfully minus Zia family from politics I will give them warm thank . and they did it . So although I day and night try to bash AL ( for good reason as I believe we deserve lot more from govt ), still now my vote will for be AL this time ( 30 December election ) as the sign of my gratefulness to AL for their great work ( minus Zia family from election ) , my allergy to khaleda zia is such high !
And later when Khaleda zia will be completely vanished from politics , then I will vote whoever pleases me .
@Al-Ansar
