Okey. The Tamil word for crow is kakkai not kakka. The Sanskrit word for crow is kaka. Also the Tamil word for color is niram not vanna. The Sanskrit word for colour is varna.
So the word Kakka Vanna is derived from Sanskrit not Tamil.
BTW what does the term kakka vanna imply? Do you know?
crow in Sanskrit is kakaha , color is varna, as per your argument the Sinhala king should have been named Kakka
havarna Tissa and not Kakkavanna Tissa
show me any Sanskrit literature text that has a name of a person ending with "vanna" ?
debunking your Sanskrit assertation
Kakkavanna or Manivanna is a common name in ancient Tamil literature, alluding to the dark Dravidian god
a text from 8th century Tamil literature on the Dravidian god
maale manivanna marghazi neer aduvam
meaning - Lord (maale) my beloved (vanna) , sapphire (mani)
13th century hymn on the Dravidian god
Kaaka Kaaka Kanaha vel Kaaka
Thaakka Thaakka Thadaiyara Thaakka
meaning - protect (kaaka) the jewel (kanaha) spear (vel)
kakka vanna in Tamil means beloved protector and not crow colored as made up by Sinhala quacks. Which make sense naming the King - Crow colored or beloved Protector ?
this just exposes the madness of the Sinhala racists' how they twist/manipulate a Tamil name into an idiotic Sanskrit name
crow in Tamil is kakka not kakkai, nursery rhyme for your Tamil pre-Ed
This is what you have mistaken. In 15th century Tamil culture influenced Sinhalese culture due to the political situation of the 12th century onwards. That is when all these Tamil cultural elements begin to materialize in Sinhalese society.
so now you admit there was a Tamil 'influence' since 12 century , why not extend it to 3rd BC ?
this just substantiates my argument, that up till the15th century, Sinhalas were Tamil Hindus and the Sinhalisation of Tamil Hindus in the south commenced in the16/17th century and was completed by 20th century.
So it is not an issue with the bogus Tamil kingdom in the north rather than the close cultural link existed between Sri Lanka and Tamilnadu.
Mahavamsa clearly states the existence of a Tamil kingdom in Anuradapura whom Duttu Gamunu defeated and 32 other Tamil chieftains all over the island. Read up, the chronicled 'history', Mahavamsa , and stop wasting my time
This is where you have mistaken. If there was any historical artifact related to the Tamil kingdom in North it should be in national museum in Colombo. If there was any historical related to the Tamil kingdom in North it should be in the national archives. So your claim that every thing related to Tamil kingdom in North was at Jaffna Library was a bogus claim.
it is about Sinhalisation of Tamils in the south etc why are you diverting to the north ?
the 3rd BC artifacts and cave inscriptions in Anuradapura are not Sinhala origin, learn to live with the reality and not hide under Sinhala Nazi fantasy based on fabricated lies and manipulated evidence.
Libraries are there to store books. Not to store historical documents. If you do not know about it go visit a library.
The 150 yr old library as one was the most prestigious in south Asia and contain more than 97,000 rare palm leaf ancient manuscripts which were important historic documents, that contested the Sinhala Nazi political history of Sri Lanka