Indischer
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2013
- Messages
- 4,844
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Building strawmen argument and demolishing them and claiming victory is what others do.
I just deny them the pleasure of such self proclaimed victory. I do that by pointing out the logical fallacy of defending a position by putting words in others mouth (which is what a strawman argument is).
When someone makes a claim that "others" follow Modi "blindly", it is a strawman argument. There is no evidence to suggest who the others are and that they follow Modi blindly.
When some claims that people expect Modi to deliver Miracles. There is no evidence to suggest that is what people expect. Yet they go on to claim that 'others' will be disappointed when Modi fails to deliver that 'miracle'.
Such claims are the stawmen, and their subsequent demolition is what the posters go on to do.
So to put is short, it is not a epithet which will stick to me.
If one starts to take literal meanings for every metaphor provided, it does not constitute a rebuttal of strawman arguments. To state something like " I don't follow Modi, but there exist many who support him. I see flaws in Modi and am prepared to weigh them when I consider his candidacy for PMship. But there exists a subset of his supporters who wilfully, intentionally try to ignore his gaffes, but not his competitor's. This coterie is selectively impervious to Modi's shortcomings and highly unforgiving to those of his competitor" is rather cumbersome. Hence the use of metaphors. The above line can be shortened to "Others follow Modi blindly".
p.s : Strawman arguments are what politicians like Modi indulge in for a living. Is this a strawman argument?