AgNoStiC MuSliM
ADVISORS
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 25,259
- Reaction score
- 87
- Country
- Location
Interesting that the argument now is that instead of 'diverting' the money towards purchasing conventional arms for the military against India, the money was spent on 'subsidies' and civilian programs.
So does this then negate the entire propaganda of the Indians and some in the US, of the military 'usurping' all the US aid money and using it to boslter its capability against India? Hey, accordng to this article, the leadership was using the money to benefit the common man on the street!
So does this then negate the entire propaganda of the Indians and some in the US, of the military 'usurping' all the US aid money and using it to boslter its capability against India? Hey, accordng to this article, the leadership was using the money to benefit the common man on the street!