BHAGAT SINGH :THE MAKING OF THE REVOLUTIONARY

[Spring Onion]

My counter question to you is why are Pakistani members here trying to hog his legacy if he wasn't a freedom fighter but a terrorist?

First the ultimate definition of a freedom fighter and a terrorist must be clarified and then we can answer you whether we hog his legacy or otherwise.'


as far as these members are concerned i guess they hold same views for every Freedom fighter unlike selective ones.

 

[Awesome]

1929: April 8—threw bomb in Central Legislative Assembly, was arrested.

lol, that's a highlight? Sounds so much like Mumtaz Qadri...

 

[Spring Onion]

A terrorist is one who kills an unarmed civilian on the street for what ever reason e, g Ajmal Kasab .

ahhhh he also tried to killed the goras and dont forget the death of the innocent police officer who btw was local not even a gora.

you may come up with thousands of excuses but all fails epically as long as you agree to one standard definition of "freedom fighter" and "terrorist" for all.

 

[twoplustwoisfour]

lol, that's a highlight? Sounds so much like Mumtaz Qadri...

The bomb was a non-lethal, flashbang I think. It was meant to cause a scene rather than kill someone, unlike your much celebrated Mumtaz Qadri

---------- Post added at 10:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:33 PM ----------

lol, that's a highlight? Sounds so much like Mumtaz Qadri...

The bomb was a non-lethal, flashbang I think. It was meant to cause a scene rather than kill someone, unlike your much celebrated Mumtaz Qadri

 

[Manas]

we dont care if he as bande matram or whatever on his lips. the question is if he was a freedom fighter then everyone who is fighting against foreign occupations are freedom fighters.

I know what are hinting at .

British India was colonial occupation of foreign land.

Kashmir and Baluchistan are are different case ,since natives of those places got equal citizenship right of their respective countries.

Anyways one man's freedom fighter can be a terrorist for another person.

 

[Spring Onion]

lol, that's a highlight? Sounds so much like Mumtaz Qadri...

yeh and they cant even say qadri has a beard while bhagt dint . oppss both have

now what?

 

[LaBong]

lol, that's a highlight? Sounds so much like Mumtaz Qadri...

Only difference is his bomb was harmless(without shrapnels) and meant only to convey the message.

Also he didn't have kind of message that Qadri guy tried to convey! :/

 

[Truth Teller]

I'm a punjabi hindu who migrated during the partition, thank you very much.

I know your lying,thank you very much.

 

[LaBong]

I know what are hinting at .

British India was colonial occupation of foreign land.

Kashmir and Baluchistan are are different case ,since natives of those places got equal citizenship right of their respective countries.

Anyways one man's freedom fighter can be a terrorist for another person.

Kashmiris actually enjoy more privileges than other lesser citizens of India.

 

[twoplustwoisfour]

First the ultimate definition of a freedom fighter and a terrorist must be clarified and then we can answer you whether we hog his legacy or otherwise.'


as far as these members are concerned i guess they hold same views for every Freedom fighter unlike selective ones.

As I said, a freedom fighter is defined by the justness of his cause, the culpability of his victims, and the means that he uses to achieve the same.

Fighting to suppress people on the basis of religion is not freedom fighting but terrorism.

Now please answer my question.

 

[LaBong]

bhagat singh was pakistani punjabi.

no offence man,but bhagat fought for his motherland and ppl(Punjab and Punjabis),he did not really fight for the rest of you indians.he probably didnt even care for you ppl.

alot of pakistani punjabis who are aware of bhagat's work,do respect him.

Yeah okay, history certainly aint favourite subject for most Pakistanis!

Why do you guys try to mould everyone in your shape, just because you lot can't see beyond your tribe or clan, you expect everyone to be so? :/

 

[twoplustwoisfour]

I know your lying,thank you very much.

Hahahaha, how do you know? Do you know my name? Do you know who I am?
































Do you think you managed to kill all of us?

 

[Spring Onion]

I know what are hinting at .

British India was colonial occupation of foreign land.

Kashmir and Baluchistan are are different case ,since natives of those places got equal citizenship right of their respective countries.

Anyways one man's freedom fighter can be a terrorist for another person.

yes Balochistan is different as its province of Pakistan under all International laws and under UN whereas KASHMIR is NOT province of India under all international laws

so dont try to hide behind Balcohistan.

so you said one man's freedom fighter is other man's terrorist so by your own yardstick please next time dont blabber about Freedom Fighter Azhar Masood, Freedom Fighter Salahuddin, Freedom fighter and so on

 

[Paan Singh]

seems few ppl cant resist trolling and nose poking in the internal affairs of other nations

 

[twoplustwoisfour]

Thank you Jana for derailing this thread so perfectly. Now, what are your opinions on Bhagat Singh, and are you willing to argue over that with Truth Teller?