What's new

Bengali Nationalism a Threat to Bangladesh's National Security

agree with the first paragraph except the "Very, very, very, very little and heavily diluted" part. but i am "desperate" about what? and what is supposed to be wrong with the "average "Bengali" look"?

That's what I want to ask you; why so desperate to claim foreign ancestry. And why does it even matter? Will it change anything?
 
. .
You know what it depends on caste, maybe Indian sikhs in UK are mostly dalits. Its not fair comparision, you have to compare Indian jatts, khatris with Pakistani punjabis. Though no doubt a lot of mixig still happen between punjabi muslims and pashtun muslims. So going forward i agree both will have different looks on average which is normal.

There are between 500.000-600.000 dalits in UK.
Most Indians in UK are Gujarati but they are almost all Patels, the second largest group is Punjabis who are mostly Jatt but also a lot of Chamars. Barely any Pakistani Punjabis n the UK. Most Pakistanis here are Mirpuris.

my post was sarcasm-over-sarcasm. get more indians to try to comprehend that together
So if it was sarcasm then that kind of makes your point completely invalid?

That's what I want to ask you; why so desperate to claim foreign ancestry. And why does it even matter? Will it change anything?
This is why people consider Bangladeshis a joke when they are claiming that 55% of there population is of foreign ancestry.
 
.
That's what I want to ask you; why so desperate to claim foreign ancestry. And why does it even matter? Will it change anything?
go and read my earlier posts. it's an answer to indians' claim that no settlers from Central Asia and Arabia and other lands settled among South Asian Muslims. if anyone is desperate it seems only indians are. and as i said it's because they feel inferior to those Western Muslim groups. if they accept the obvious that many South Asian Muslims have admixture from the Western Muslim groups, they will feel inferior to South Asian Muslims as well, which they don't want. so go and ask Indians why they are so desperate to disprove the obvious
 
.
Most Indians in UK are Gujarati but they are almost all Patels, the second largest group is Punjabis who are mostly Jatt but also a lot of Chamars. Barely any Pakistani Punjabis n the UK. Most Pakistanis here are Mirpuris.


So if it was sarcasm then that kind of makes your point completely invalid?

Yes i read 70% are Mirpuris, who by the way are not Kashmiri ethnically.
 
. . .
bangladeshi girls look better than pakistani girls.Some of them in world t20 crowds were just drop dead gorgeous :p:
 
.
Most of the MP's claim they are Kashmiri? Are they?

No, we in Punjab have actual Kashmiri decendents 2 million of them, they have surnames like Butt, Khawaja, Dar etc. Mirpuris are gujjar, jatts manly who just happen to live in Azad Kashmir.
 
. .
go and read my earlier posts. it's an answer to indians' claim that no settlers from Central Asia and Arabia and other lands settled among South Asian Muslims. if anyone is desperate it seems only indians are. and as i said it's because they feel inferior to those Western Muslim groups. if they accept the obvious that many South Asian Muslims have admixture from the Western Muslim groups, they will feel inferior to South Asian Muslims as well, which they don't want. so go and ask Indians why they are so desperate to disprove the obvious

Again, it comes back to the same flawed logic. Let's suppose you're not Bengali, but actually Arabs; how does that make you superior to anyone else?

Yes i read 70% are Mirpuris, who by the way are not Kashmiri ethnically.

Most Pakistanis in the UK indeed hail from Azad Kashmir, more specifically from Mirpur/Kotli.
They're not 'Kashmiri' ethnically, but are still not Punjabis either. I think the technical term is Potohari people.
 
.
Again, it comes back to the same flawed logic. Let's suppose you're not Bengali, but actually Arabs; how does that make you superior to anyone else?
are bhai this what i've been saying all along - it does not. it's only Indians who believe it does
 
.
are bhai this what i've been saying all along - it does not. it's only Indians who believe it does
Why is a Bangladeshi speaking for us?:lol:
We don't believe any of that, no one in India even claims foreign ancestry unlike you Bangladeshis who were saying that 55% are of foreign origin.:rofl:
 
.
Why is a Bangladeshi speaking for us?:lol:
We don't believe any of that, no one in India even claims foreign ancestry unlike you Bangladeshis who we're saying that 55% are of foreign origin.:rofl:
of course you don't (except the Aryan 'thing')

but you do claim that South Asian Muslims have no "foreign" lineage. why? because by believing this exaggerated claim and going by your complex that West Asian Muslim groups are superior, you can make yourself feel superior to South Asian Muslims.
 
.
of course you don't (except the Aryan 'thing')

but you do claim that South Asian Muslims have no "foreign" lineage. why? because by believing this exaggerated claim and going by your complex that West Asian Muslim groups are superior, you can make yourself feel superior to South Asian Muslims.
A lot of Indians not including myself don't believe in the Aryan invasion theory so that failed.:lol:
Lol, we say that South Asian Muslims have no foreign lineage because you don't have any foreign lineage!
It's your people that are desperate to prove it. Show me a genetic test that proves you have foreign lineage?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom