Dubious
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2012
- Messages
- 37,717
- Reaction score
- 80
- Country
- Location
When have politicians been responsible for their country? But it still makes it a country now doesnt it?you missed the point, I will try simplify matters even further. Don't you think if you want to be a country, you have to become responsible for it?
That is like saying if Belgium and France want happiness they better not pretend to be secular while following Christian beliefs, ringing their church bells, weekends coinciding with Sunday rather than say Tuesday? but outwardly pretending to be secular and non related to Christianity!If Afghanistan wants to be safe as a country it better not allow islamisation under taleban, or provide a base for osama to attack the USA. But they did and suffered the consequence.
Afghanistan was Muslim way before America went for cold war....they had their issues but imposing your insecurity on them is disgusting least to say!
If india wants to be a safe country it shouldnt have unanimously voted for a known criminal!If Pakistan wants to be safe as a country it better not allow islamic radicals take over their military or provide shelter for Osama et al. But they did and suffered the consequence.
I could give you equal examples!
In each statement you highlighted your own phobia! You mean any other radicals are welcome just as long as they are not related to Islam?Coming back to Belgium, if they want to be safe as a country they better not allow islamic radicals and provide shelter to them. But they did and suffered the consequence.
And the very fact that Islam means peace linking it to radical just shows lack of basic understanding of the word let alone the religion! Its like saying the bald man with was combing his really long hair!
You called it a hypothesis I quoted you and said yes if there were no if it wouldnt be a hypothesis....Come on, you admitted that 'IF' represents a hypothesis