Battle of ALCMs : BrahMos A vs Pakistan’s Ra’ad

[kaykay]

LIL we never bragged or claim it as ingenuous as Indian claims tejas to be. the show and heype India loves to create and their drama. We can never reach that level

LOLz you can't brag for something which is not yours. Anyway point was that taking some consultation in designing won't make it any less Indian. If that was the case, Jf-17 would bea Russian and not Chinese. What Jf-17 is to China, Tejas is to India.

Dont show me cheap posters ! tell me as you claimed that you have the rights to produce GE engines. Show me that proof

http://www.gereports.com/post/110927997125/ges-brilliant-advanced-manufacturing-plant-in/

 

[Ultima Thule]

Child CM-400 is not some mythical missile

Klub N And S are way more full fledged CM missile than CM 400

so does BraMouse kid and Klub N and

 

[John Reese]

LOLz you can't brag for something which is not yours. Anyway point was that taking some consultation in designing won't make it any less Indian. If that was the case, Jf-17 would bea Russian and not Chinese. What Jf-17 is to China, Tejas is to India.


http://www.gereports.com/post/110927997125/ges-brilliant-advanced-manufacturing-plant-in/

These guys Come here Unprepared They Don't Of Even Believe in Intellectual Property rights or Technology Patents

so does BraMouse kid and Klub N and

Father of chinese Technology Is russia Even there Nuclear warhead Designs Are Copied on Soviets Warheads
Read history

 

[salarsikander]

I Just mentioned In my Previous We out Sourced It To GE Which Expert In Engine Designing and Manufacturing

They Manufacturing it in India With Local Engineers & Local Support in the Pune Plant
We as Industry Will get Experience from it

We are already Planned For Getting that rights from US under DTII

http://www.defensenews.com/story/de...hnology-top-priority-india-us-talks/76979974/

The United States has updated its policy on gas-turbine engine technology transfer to India, a move that should lead to expanded cooperation in production and design of jet-engine components, a joint statement said on Thursday.

http://in.reuters.com/article/usa-india-defense-idINKBN0TU02720151211



As for Engine Development We have are own parallel
France offer 1 billion $ in Engines
https://defence.pk/threads/battle-of-alcms-brahmos-a-vs-pakistan’s-ra’ad.439658/page-10#post-8480540

Plz post genuine websites. It says that phishing attack imminent

What Jf-17 is to China,

LOL China doesnt even have jf-17 in its inventory

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Those are as indigenous as your Raad which is based on South African Mupsow.

Funny Targo was never completed... It was an extension of the Raptor Stand off missiles (on which H Series SOMs were based-- produced by Pakistan).
You'd be stupid to think a drawing board stand off missile with a range of 150 is a Raad with 350 km range and no physical or other commonality.

Mupsow however gave us H-2 & H-4 missiles -- 60-90km & 150+ km range respectively.

Raad has more in common with a Tomahawk than a Targos;

Fixed intakes,fixed wings,different design,short ranged,different warhead,conventional,small payload etc and never went into production or completion.

RA'AD;

 

[Ultima Thule]

So Is Klub Series Cruise Missiles
And KH-9ME ,KH-55

Brahmos is only A Addition To Indian Nuclear Triad Inventory

We have All the variants of Brahmos Sea launched,Land,Submarine Air

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/india/brahmos.htm
http://www.brahmos.com/newscenter.php?newsid=115


Do you Even has Warhead To fit In

Do you Even tested a Miniature Nuclear device Ever

Please Provide the Source Where It Operationally Deployed

so what we have not only Cm-400 but harpoon, exocet, C-802, C-803( sizzler type) and what for Nasr kid do not live denial mood ever go Pakistan strategical section search the relevant threads as usual Indian superiority complex

 

[kaykay]

Plz post genuine websites. It says that phishing attack imminent


LOL China doesnt even have jf-17 in its inventory

They have designed and developed it...They may or may not need it. It doesn't make it any less Chinese.

 

[Ultima Thule]

These guys Come here Unprepared They Don't Of Even Believe in Intellectual Property rights or Technology Patents


Father of chinese Technology Is russia Even there Nuclear warhead Designs Are Copied on Soviets Warheads
Read history

1. wow what great logic you have yours from ALIENS yours 75 to 80% military technology is based on Soviets and Russian designs not yours

 

[salarsikander]

They have designed and developed it...They may or may not need it. It doesn't make it any less Chinese.

It was joint venture that you conveniently skipped out to feed your ego

 

[GuardianRED]

CM-400 is based on YJ-12 which is anti ship missile, so primary mission for CM-400 is anti ship and secondary land attack, CM-400 was inducted by PAF in 2012, sorry baby to burst your bubbles as usual Indian superiority complex

Wow .... again No Proof of it in PAF Hands !! talk abt DENIAL!

So ISreal declines to comment on is nuke, does it mean it doesnt posses them? I thought you were well updated with Pak military. anyways, its useless since you dont know how they run things around here


LIL we never bragged or claim it as ingenuous as Indian claims tejas to be. the show and heype India loves to create and their drama. We can never reach that level

Yes Now we know that things are run by drama , hyped and denial!

 

[gslv mk3]

1. wow what great logic you have yours from from ALIENS yours 75 to 80% military technology is based on Soviets and Russian designs not yours

I often find posts like this to be really amusing. See, some guy is pulling out figures from thin air, and presenting it as some sort of credible 'fact'

It was joint venture that you conveniently skipped out to feed your ego

Yes, JF 17, a fighter developed in China, jointly by China & Pakistan with China playing a major role & with Mikoyan as consultant is JV, but a fourth generation fighter developed in India, by ADA with consultancy from Dassault is not Indian. What kind of logic is that.

Please comment on the nation of origin for Gripen too.

 

[salarsikander]

Yes Now we know that things are run by drama , hyped and denial!

Not Hyped of course not. You people are experts in creating hype. Denial, yes that what we do best. Keeping enemy at dark

 

[Ultima Thule]

Wow .... again No Proof of it in PAF Hands !! talk abt DENIAL!


Yes Now we know that things are run by drama , hyped and denial!

yeah yeah , you are state of DENIAL not me, what makes you happy as usual Indian superiority complex

I often find posts like this to be really amusing. See, some guy is pulling out figures from thin air, and presenting it as some sort of credible 'fact'

you are live in the state of DENIAL

 

[Basel]

That doesn't prove anything. Indians too can brag about Brahmos, while our own LFRJ technology is still in works.

If its India Brahmos Supersonic CM then its invincible but If China made supersonic CMs like CX-1, YJ-12, YJ-18, YJ-100 & CM400AKG then those are junk and useless wow how hypocrite Indians are. Ra'ad will not be good to compare with with brahmos because both are based on different tech and doctrine. Only near comparison of Brahmos-A is CM-400AKG as both are supersonic and can hit fixed and moving targets with good accuracy.

 

[John Reese]

CX-1, YJ-12, YJ-18, YJ-100 & CM400AKG

Yj-12 or YJ-1000 Reverse Engineered KH-1


Yj-18 Super sonic at terminal stage


CX-1 Is Prototype

Brahmos-A is CM-400AKG as both are supersonic and can hit fixed and moving targets with good accuracy.

CM-400 KG is not Proper Cruise Missile It follows Ballistic trajectory Makes it Vulnerable against Radars
Missile get is Speed And Terminal Stage

"A list of system features appears to confirm an unusual characteristic associated with the CM-400. Unlike most high-speed cruise missiles, which fly at low altitude to avoid detection, the CM-400 uses “high [altitude] launching” to achieve “higher aircraft survivability”, according to the video".

A fighter such as the Chengdu/Pakistan Aeronautical Complex JF-17 would launch the missile at speeds between Mach 0.7 and M0.9 at an elevation between 26,200ft and 39,400ft, according to the AVIC specifications.


Source :
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/dubai-china-details-performance-of-carrier-killer-393301/
http://missilethreat.com/dubai-china-details-performance-of-carrier-killer-missile-for-jf-17/