What's new

Bangladesh will stand by India if Pakistan wages war against India

As you say hell was breaking loose the People were essentially pakistani and instead of the natural conclusion were delivered on a plate to a people they considered their enemy

It was only Pakistani action that took northern kashmir and blocked india from central Asia Afghanistan Russia and beyond and opened a route to China


They were muslims not Pakistanis...not yet.

There might be problems but muslims,let's be real,aren't hearded in Sobibor like camps in India.
 
It was the decision of the ruler of princely states which mattered the most- and even democratically elected Govt- of J&K unanimously passed Its constitution which says J&K is an integral part of India-


No it was the decision of the people that should have mattered

Your denial of this and subsequent occupation has caused 70 years of emnity
 
But of course....

Pakistan subjugated us, treated us as second class citizens and 2nd class muslims (on this forum after all these years, members still speak of our our level of 'imaan'), made us fight for the right to express ourselves in our own language and eventually killed, murdered, tortured and raped our women because we dared to be free.

If it weren't for our glorious...courageous...heroic...inspirational....( I can keep going) Mukti Bahini fighting the oppressive Pakistani regime and Army we would not have gained independence.

Pakistan to date refuses to acknowledge wrongdoings - instead, it rewrites history.

India is no great friend of Bangladesh - no big nation ever is, when it comes to a small neighbor. But the murderous BSF has a LONG, LONG way to go before it can even dream of the atrocities Pakistan committed against Bangladesh.
However if it weren't for the Indian helping hand - both militarily and humanitarian, victory and independence would have come at a much higher price.

So, yeah...while it may make zero difference (I am under no delusions as to our military or diplomatic 'clout')..it's natural, we'd side with India (morally) if Pakistan wrongfully attacked India.

Boot-lickers? Sure...if that's what you want to call us...I'd rather be that, than have muslim 'brothers' who gleefully raped their muslim 'sisters'.

The Pro - Jamaati faction on here most based in the UK is probably shedding tears of rage and cursing Sheikh Hasina and AL...It's cool fellas, if a war breaks out again, you can do what your spiritual forefathers did...join up with the razakars :lol:
People here read many better write ups from Dalals scripts like Ami Bijoy Dekechi, Legacy of Blood, Banglar Bani's editorials etc even before some here were born. If anything you know better than above garbage then come for me to waste valuable times otherwise start reading from 'British's draconian Surjasta Ain' of 1887, for which E. Bengalis were subjugated by Hindu Zamideers and remained with only 2 Mills AKA Kumodini and Mohini up until 1947. Indian migrants and W Pakistanis raised it to 247 in 23 years. If that constituted oppressions then more of such one would be welcomed by any sane one throughout the world. .
 
Last edited:
They were muslims not Pakistanis...not yet.

There might be problems but muslims,let's be real,aren't hearded in Sobibor like camps in India.

They were an extension of the people of Northern Pakistan and they wanted to be part of their own people and nation
 
They were an extension of the people of Northern Pakistan and they wanted to be part of their own people and nation


Dude,how many Hindus were expelled from today's Pakistan ? extensiun,no extension....it happened...move on.
 
No it was the decision of the people that should have mattered

Your denial of this and subsequent occupation has caused 70 years of emnity

J&K Assembly had the decision of its people- What are you trying to say here ?

The decision of people in East Pakistan never mattered when you didn't allow the democratically elected Awami League to form Government in Pakistan-
 
Dude,how many Hindus were expelled from today's Pakistan ? extensiun,no extension....it happened...move on.

The kashmiris have not been expelled, they are living in their own homes in their own land under occupation, they are fighting for their freedom

It is unfinished business of Partition, moving on is not an option

J&K Assembly had the decision of its people- What are you trying to say here ?

The decision of people in East Pakistan never mattered when you didn't allow the democratically elected Awami League to form Government in Pakistan-

Stooges appointed by a hindu rajah made the decision for a Muslim majority population who wanted Partition, not the people

This is why you have months of chaos and curfew 70 years after


East and West Pakistan was never going to work separated by 1000 miles
 
We have been a democracy longer than anything else

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistani_general_election,_1970

The Pakistani general election of 1970 (Bengali: পাকিস্তানের সাধারণ নির্বাচন, ১৯৭০), held on 7 December of that year, was the first general election held in Pakistan (East and West Pakistan). Voting took place in 300 parliamentary constituencies of Pakistan to elect members of the National Assembly of Pakistan, which was then the only chamber of a unicameral Parliament of Pakistan.

Party: Awami League, Seats won: 160 Votes: 39%
Party: PPP, Seats won: 81 Votes: 18.6%


Result: We all know what happened-
 
It was 1947(or 48?) and hell was breaking loose between you guys (Ind-Pak).I don't think democrcy was on the top of the agenda.Ok,Kshmir didn't have a referendum,nor did India or Pakistan.This beeing said,he was the ruler there,blessed by the British,the law and all.

Democracy was, as referendum was promised. The British empire was caught between two of their kids lol. Do remember British officers led the attacks in Kashmir at first. :o:
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistani_general_election,_1970

The Pakistani general election of 1970 (Bengali: পাকিস্তানের সাধারণ নির্বাচন, ১৯৭০), held on 7 December of that year, was the first general election held in Pakistan (East and West Pakistan). Voting took place in 300 parliamentary constituencies of Pakistan to elect members of the National Assembly of Pakistan, which was then the only chamber of a unicameral Parliament of Pakistan.

Party: Awami League, Seats won: 160 Votes: 39%
Party: PPP, Seats won: 81 Votes: 18.6%


Result: We all know what happened-

??????
How does this change we have been a democracy longer than anything else
 
The kashmiris have not been expelled, they are living in their own homes in their own land under occupation, they are fighting for their freedom

It is unfinished business of Partition, moving on is not an option


Moving on is the best option.

Look,I come from a country obsessed of how its people have been assimilitated and driven from their homes and for good reasons.My people used to live from Greece to the Ukrainian hinterland but they've been assimilated by force.We can look back in anger and plot revenge or move on and try to better what we have,as in our current country.My advice is to better your country,India will still outgrow you,it's an uphill battle.
 
We all know the state of democracy in Pakistan- do I need to elaborated the number of years under Military Dictatorship- or the strength of civilian Govt- over policy matters- Whenever there is civilian govt-

Well that doesn't change the fact it is a democratic government and you keep going back in time.
 
Democracy was, as referendum was promised. The British empire was caught between two of their kids lol. Do remember British officers led the attacks in Kashmir at first. :o:


Do you think India will give it up or Pakistan can ever force them ?
 
It was the whole point of Partition

The populations had major issues their was brutal violence and a long history

The freedom movement in Kashmir had started a long time before, partition was a natural conclusion to the problems

Kashmir is culturally, faith wise, linguistically an extension of Northern Pakistan even physically they are essentially northern Pakistanis

As brutal as Partition was, south asia could have healed and moved on but the occupation of a Muslim majority state which rightly should have gone to Pakistan has caused 70 years of chaos

As brutal as Partition was, south asia could have healed and moved on but the occupation of a Muslim majority state which rightly should have gone to Pakistan has caused 70 years of chaos
It's not occupation of 1 Muslim state but 2, for which you are seeing RAWMAY misinter's such statement. Do you count Mahbuba Mufti or Faroque Abdula's saying on Kashmir? If not then don't count other Dalal's arse licking of Indians on behalf of BDeshis either, thanks.
 
Back
Top Bottom