What's new

Bangladesh sided with India at ICC meeting

BanglaBhoot

RETIRED TTA
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
8,839
Reaction score
5
Country
France
Location
France
Bangladesh sided with India at the ICC meeting that sought to scrap the rotation policy despite the newest full-member nation has reasons to fall victim to any such decision.

Bangladesh Cricket Board president AHM Mustafa Kamal on Saturday admitted he voted in favour of scrapping the rotational presidency, though he said he did it on condition.

The India-backed idea of scrapping the rotation policy received overwhelming support from the other countries except Pakistan and Sri Lanka.

Pakistan voted against the proposal and Sri Lanka remained absent, which gave the ruling body of world cricket a mandate to scrap the policy, though at the end of the meeting it withheld the decision and formed a committee to review the rule change.

If Bangladesh had voted against it, the proposal would have been rejected outright as the ICC needed at least eight votes from its full members for a constitutional amendment.

Any such constitutional amendment would impact Pakistan and Bangladesh as the South Asian countries were supposed to nominate the candidate who would succeed New Zealander Alan Isaac, now a vice-president, as the ICC chief in 2014.

Pakistan has already had their chance with Ehsan Mani heading the ICC from 2003-06, meaning Bangladesh has the strongest claim this time.

Naturally it was expected that Bangladesh would take a strong position against it, but surprisingly it voted in favour of the India-backed proposal, which raised quite a few eyebrows.

‘Yes, I signed the circular resolution in favour of scrapping the rotational policy,’ Kamal told a crowded press conference on Saturday at Mirpur.

‘I did it to buy time as I was confident that it won’t be scrapped. I knew for sure that three countries – South Africa, Sri Lanka and Pakistan – won’t accept it,’ said Kamal.

Kamal was confident Bangladesh will get their chance to nominate a vice-president in 2012 once the term of New Zealander Alan Isaac ended and he himself will be nominated by the Bangladesh Cricket Board.

Isaac will head the ICC until June 2012 and the vice-president will take over afterwards. If everything goes according to plan Kamal will be the first Bangladeshi to head ICC.

He needs to come out as the elected president of the BCB first as the ICC recently banned all kinds of government meddling in its member boards.

Recently a BCB director Shafiul Arefin accused Kamal of not agreeing to the draft amendment to its constitution which would allow the BCB to hold an election for the post of president.

Kamal defended his position and said he opposed the idea as he was new in cricket administration.

‘I had just come to the board when the issue was raised and I opposed it because I was very new at the board,’ said Kamal.

‘Now there has to be an elected president and I welcome the decision and will work to add the new amendment to the constitution,’ said Kamal.

New Age | Newspaper
 
. . .
BCB going to gain more by agreeing with BCCI then to became ICC chief .....
 
.
The short answer is that BCCI is where the money is!

Notwithstanding, I do not like the BCCI!

The only thing in their favour is that they have broken the Anglo Saxon nexus.

Bangladesh has the most youthful and promising players and it has the potential to be the top team one day.

I feel sorry that Ashraful somehow has practically left the scene. Had great potential.
 
. . .
How is related to defence? It seems for some Bangladeshi members hate India is only their mission
 
.
It is not absolutely true that Bangladesh sided with the bhartis in the ICC meeting. But can be described well as a misguided siding. Bangladesh accepted the decision on the condition that this will take affect after 2014 not now which the bhartis are looking for to exclude pakistan and bangladesh from the presidency of ICC. Better would be to remain absent or to give a straight no. This is not only bangladesh and pakistan but other countries like zimbabwe, south africa, west africa and even sri lanka is against the decision n the last decision that I have seen ICC has temporarily stopped this process of cancellation of rotatinf presidency.

N this is pretty old news and many new updates are there after the event, I do not know why munshi has posted this news here....

Bangladesh tries to get out of the mess

Bangladesh tries to get out of the mess

LOKENDRA PRATAP SAHI

Calcutta: Having signed its own death warrant, so to say, the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) is scrambling to take back its signature before the warrant is executed.

Monday, indeed, saw dramatic happenings in Hong Kong, which is hosting the International Cricket Council (ICC)’s Annual Conference Week.

Officially, the most talked about development was on the umpire Decision Review System front, with a hitherto stubborn India falling in line with the wishes of the fraternity.

Unofficially, the BCB took centre stage, once word got around that it was having “second thoughts” on agreeing to amend the ICC’s constitution and, in the process, signing away the chance to have its nominee ascend the president’s chair in 2014.

That the BCB had acted against its own interests had been reported first by The Telegraph, on June 23. To put it mildly, BCB president Mustafa Kamal is in troubled waters.

“The BCB is arguing that it wasn’t really aware of the consequences of the resolution via circular which it signed on May 31... But that can’t be withdrawn... What’s done can’t be undone... If the BCB wants a re-vote, at the Executive Board, then it must have the support of eight of the 10 Full (Test-playing) Members. That’s out of the question,” a well-placed source revealed.

Belatedly, what the BCB can do is to vote against the constitutional change when it’s put before the General Council. The move is being spearheaded by India and England.

For its part, the BCB put out a press release, saying: “The BCB, in principle, agrees to the proposed amendment... However, the BCB feels that an equal and fair opportunity should be given to all existing Full Member countries to avail the privileges of the current rotational system...”

After the late realisation, the BCB claims to have written to ICC president Sharad Pawar, calling for the change to come into effect “only after the completion” of the existing cycle.

Bangladesh and Pakistan have been clubbed together in the rotational system and, as the latter’s Ehsan Mani has already been the president (2003-06), Bangladesh had the strongest claim this time around.

Going by the existing cycle, the BCB nominee could have taken over as vice-president next year and become the president in 2014, at the end of Alan Isaac’s term.

When the resolution via circular was put to ‘vote’, Pakistan objected, while Sri Lanka abstained. Pakistan, one learns, plans to take “legal action.”

Ijaz Butt, the Pakistan Cricket Board chairman, has been threatening that rather publicly in Hong Kong. The irony is that he’s himself under acute pressure to keep his chair.

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), meanwhile, has quickly moved to placate the Associate Members, 35 of whom will be voting in the General Council.

Specifically, the BCCI has conveyed to the Associates that it would have “no objections” to a 14-team World Cup in 2015 as well.

In other words, like in the last World Cup, four can qualify.

The BCCI’s position has shifted, for reasons which are more ‘political’ in nature, but it hasn’t surprised. That the Associates’ script could unfold in this very manner had also been reported in these columns, on June 23.

Of course, the BCCI won’t favour a qualification process, but call for the automatic entry of all 10 Test-playing nations if, eventually, the Executive Board decides on a 10-team competition.

Australia and New Zealand, the joint hosts, are (as of now) in favour of just 10 teams.

The ICC chief executives’ committee, which finished its deliberations on Monday, has recommended a “qualification process,” without talking of the number of teams.

Rather strange that. The call will now have to be made by the Executive Board.

Footnote: Bangladesh is to host the next Asia Cup, between March 12-23 next year. Sri Lanka hosted the last edition, in 2010.
 
.
Given you paranoia that has been evident throughout, next you will say that Bangladesh and Pakistan were bought off by the Indians!

Money speaks, what?
 
.
Given you paranoia that has been evident throughout, next you will say that Bangladesh and Pakistan were bought off by the Indians!

Money speaks, what?

No not money speaks but majority of the country has shut the mouth of bhartis in the ICC meeting. Now ICC has put the decision of scrapping rotation presidency on hold as many countries has raised object to it n this is unlikely to be passed at least without fulfilling the current cycle which will end in 2014. N in that case Bangladesh will have no objection. Your bharti money of BCCI can not do anything about it.
 
. .
No not money speaks but majority of the country has shut the mouth of bhartis in the ICC meeting. Now ICC has put the decision of scrapping rotation presidency on hold as many countries has raised object to it n this is unlikely to be passed at least without fulfilling the current cycle which will end in 2014. N in that case Bangladesh will have no objection. Your bharti money of BCCI can not do anything about it.

What gives u the impression that BCCI represents India. It is simply a corporate body that manages cricket in India. It does not have any government sanction, nor do Indians have any role to play in the election of BCCI members. We love our cricketers and we love the game. The average Indian cares a rat's @ss about the BCCI or its politics.
 
. .
What gives u the impression that BCCI represents India. It is simply a corporate body that manages cricket in India. It does not have any government sanction, nor do Indians have any role to play in the election of BCCI members. We love our cricketers and we love the game. The average Indian cares a rat's @ss about the BCCI or its politics.

I presume in Bangladesh the Govt controls sports and possibly they cannot understand the difference.

I just cannot stand the BCCI as I said before in a previous post.

Too commercial.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom