Bangladesh originated from movement for Bangla as national language of East Pakistan:Pranab Mukherje

[mb444]

This statement is quite wrong. Indians want us to remain in a make-believe world created by the Indian propaganda machine. This includes also the Language Movement.

During 1952 there was no one who shouted "Pakistan Murdabad" and the issue died out subsequently. It more died when the 1965 Constitution of Pakistan proclaimed "Bengali and Urdu shall be the State languages of Pakistan". No one heard anyone speaking against Urdu except people in the east were demanding Bengali to be made a State Language that meant that it should be the medium of education here.
Now, an Indian politician proclaiming this movement as the source of a separate Bangladesh. There was not even a Bangladesh Movement before the PA military crackdown and bullying in 1971. Why this idiot Pranab Mukherjee does not start a Language Movement in west Bengal to prove his stupid point?
Bangladesh became a separate country because of bickering between the then leaders of two wings and a geographical separation. Language movement had no function in 1971.

Bangladesh movement crystalised many different issues of marginalisation of bangalies by the west pakistanies.

You can say indians magnified the issues through their effort but the issues were not manufactured by them.

In india they recognised and accomodated linguistic, cultural, religious and other diversities from the start as it should have been in pakistan.

The later did not and the result is bangladesh. India would have balkanised too if it followed the Pakistan trajectory.

The marginalistion of the bengali polity started immediately from the birth of pakistan.

It does not serve history or future to deny this. Would i have liked the pakistan union to survive.... yes i would as i am a proponent of the Ummah and pan-islamic unity. But with hindsight do I believe that seperation was best for Bangladesh... 100 percent yes.

 

[DarkPrince]

If language classification for Nation States holds true to this day in Bengal, why Bangladesh and West Bengal two different entities?

Maybe we are India's unofficial state. But don't you think it's better for us to remain pro India ?

 

[Jackdaws]

Also West Pakistanis considered Bengali script as Indic and that's why the reluctance.

 

[American Pakistani]

It did unify the country, but traitor are traitors. They will find something to object about, may they ever suffer for colluding against their people.

I guess it in their blood.

 

[Imran Khan]

common man its 2019

Maybe we are India's unofficial state. But don't you think it's better for us to remain pro India ?

its not only better but there is no other option also sir . BD is surrounded almost all sides from india

 

[Neptune_]

Pranab Mukherjee is spot on here.

Almost 60% of Pakistanis main language was bangla back then. But West Pakistan regime forcefully imposed a language on bengalis which wasn't used by even 30% of total Pakistanis.

From that day we realised that if we remained with West Pakistan they would never give us our well deserved right. Pranab Mukherjee is correct when he said that Bangladesh originated from the language movement. But yes, the unprecedent looting that west pakistan regime did from 47-71 also played a huge role.

 

[JohnWick]

We don't give a shit to it.

 

[El Sidd]

Maybe we are India's unofficial state. But don't you think it's better for us to remain pro India ?

Easy thing to do so i guess makes sense.

 

[Shahzaz ud din]

It is useless for the BanglaHindue followers to cry over split milk

 

[bluesky]

I guess it in their blood.

Yes, it is our blood that started the movement for a separate country for the Muslims in the then India. It was the leaders of west Pakistan that rebelled against the elected representatives of the country and tried to force its will on the east. Oh, I forgot that you were fearful to hold even the first session of the Parliament.

It is in your blood that you will remain a group of ingrates to see another division of your country by the Talibanic hooliganism.

 

[ziaulislam]

Urdu and Bangla were both decreed as National languages in the constitution of United Pakistan which finally changed in 1973.

all previous consitution gave bangla a national language status however, from bengalis i hear they wanted only bangladesh as national langauage for both east and west pakistan.

 

[American Pakistani]

Yes, it is our blood that started the movement for a separate country for the Muslims in the then India. It was the leaders of west Pakistan that rebelled against the elected representatives of the country and tried to force its will on the east. Oh, I forgot that you were fearful to hold even the first session of the Parliament.

It is in your blood that you will remain a group of ingrates to see another division of your country by the Talibanic hooliganism.

You can keep wishing for breakup of Pakistan like your master bhart. Ain't happening anytime soon. Pakistan was as is historically under IVC and it will remain as is in future, Inshallah. With the same name or a different name doesn't matter.

And cut that crap of you starting the movement.

If Bangladesh was truly "bangla" country, WHY is west Bengal not part of it? Accept it or deny it but you can't fool the world that Bangladesh is just a satellite state of bharat and will stay so.

That's your destiny.

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

It did unify the country, but traitor are traitors. They will find something to object about, may they ever suffer for colluding against their people.

You can keep wishing for breakup of Pakistan like your master bhart. Ain't happening anytime soon. Pakistan was as is historically under IVC and it will remain as is in future, Inshallah. With the same name or a different name doesn't matter.

And cut that crap of you starting the movement.

If Bangladesh was truly "bangla" country, WHY is west Bengal not part of it? Accept it or deny it but you can't fool the world that Bangladesh is just a satellite state of bharat and will stay so.

That's your destiny.

In fact, Pak has just won in Afganistan for the second time. In fact, she's getting larger....

And, what a victory!!!! It's the battle for the "Heart of Asia"!!!!! I would rate it a thousand times more important than a thousand losses like that in BD.....

As for the Ehl-i Iman, no Afganistan no Muslim Empires in Hindustan or Byzantine...

For a reason the Super Powers of their times put the lives of their own folks, wealth, reputation etc. at stake to get a foothold in Afganistan.....

Slowly and steadily the organs that make PAKISTAN are getting together. Now, it's the time for "A" for Afgania. Not to mention there's no "B" there to begin with!!! It's all about getting an "A"....

As for BD, she's getting even more subjugated under India for India considers BD as an extension of her security and economic arrangements. And, all through a proxy RAW government by India, of India and for India...

 

[bluesky]

You can keep wishing for breakup of Pakistan like your master bhart. Ain't happening anytime soon. Pakistan was as is historically under IVC and it will remain as is in future, Inshallah. With the same name or a different name doesn't matter.

And cut that crap of you starting the movement.

If Bangladesh was truly "bangla" country, WHY is west Bengal not part of it? Accept it or deny it but you can't fool the world that Bangladesh is just a satellite state of bharat and will stay so.

That's your destiny.

Pakistan was a good riddance for us. We created history two times. One before and in 1947 by virtue of which you have been removed from the Slave status of your Lalaji Sikh Overlords. The other we created by fighting your overlord attitudes of bullying. You have become a debtor nation as a result while we are enjoying our dollars. Oh!! It is more than $32 billion that you can no more steal. What a relief!!

 

[Safriz]

Urdu and Bangla were both decreed as National languages in the constitution of United Pakistan which finally changed in 1973.

In his 1947 speech Quaid e Azam said urdu will be national language but all provinces are free to adopt regional languages
So federation had to be run in urdu but provinces could translate their local documents and day to day affairs in their local language