However, some people in BD do not recognize Assam staying with India. So, a kind of tug-of-war may continue for many years to come. I do not understand if India thinks the status of Assam serves its national interest.
Bangladesh liberation fighters say a loud thank you to India
- Thread starter ARCHON
- Start date
- Status
However, some people in BD do not recognize Assam staying with India. So, a kind of tug-of-war may continue for many years to come. I do not understand if India thinks the status of Assam serves its national interest.
KS
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2010
- Messages
- 12,528
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Bilal Akhtar
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2011
- Messages
- 305
- Reaction score
- 0
bangladesh is a product of indian intellegence it is and always will be thankful to its masters.
my name is arya
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2010
- Messages
- 348
- Reaction score
- 0
Last edited by a moderator:
my name is arya
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2010
- Messages
- 348
- Reaction score
- 0
at least they are not slave anymore to pakistani
now they are living freedom they can live with proud
Stealth_fighter
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2009
- Messages
- 409
- Reaction score
- 0
you r really lucky that some how my mouse clicked on thank button instead of quick reply and i cant withdraw it.anyway its killing me like hell.people like u r deserved for sh*t not for thanks
i m talking to u dumb a$s akhtar
i m talking to u dumb a$s akhtar
Al-zakir
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2008
- Messages
- 8,612
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
Keep the fact straight and don't try to be smart as if we do not understand your motive. East Pakistan was never a slave to West Pakistan. There were political and economical grievance but no body was slave. Most of them discrimination BS took place due to some Bengali minded Hindu cultured Muslim (Islamic name Tagore loving munafiqs) so blame can not be place on them unilaterally.
So keep your BS and leave this matter to us. We did not give permission to no damn Bharati to lobby for us. So keep out.
Last edited:
Skies
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2009
- Messages
- 4,094
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
@ Indians
You got a huge market in BD, because we are not East Pakistan now. You have been selling tons of your products in BD since its birth. But it would not be possible if we were East Pakistan. So why are you crying for thanks, you already have got trillions worth of market here with a weaker Bangladesh and Pakistan as bonus. Personally, I have no problem with India if it stops its interference in BD. A good relationship with India is possible only if India acts as it is supposed to. BD people are friendly if you can be friendly.
BTW, I see many people to act like so superior and bravo against Burma just because Burma is not developed and strong like India. Burma may possess hostile attitude towards BD but it's BD's responsibility to make or create good relationship with Burma. As like marketing-people create demand and market to sell their products, BD should create opportunities with Burma to get a new way for economy, agriculture and strategy. But sadly BD does not act intelligently.
You got a huge market in BD, because we are not East Pakistan now. You have been selling tons of your products in BD since its birth. But it would not be possible if we were East Pakistan. So why are you crying for thanks, you already have got trillions worth of market here with a weaker Bangladesh and Pakistan as bonus. Personally, I have no problem with India if it stops its interference in BD. A good relationship with India is possible only if India acts as it is supposed to. BD people are friendly if you can be friendly.
BTW, I see many people to act like so superior and bravo against Burma just because Burma is not developed and strong like India. Burma may possess hostile attitude towards BD but it's BD's responsibility to make or create good relationship with Burma. As like marketing-people create demand and market to sell their products, BD should create opportunities with Burma to get a new way for economy, agriculture and strategy. But sadly BD does not act intelligently.
Last edited:
Md Akmal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2010
- Messages
- 2,114
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
NO ROOM TO PAY HOMAGE TO ARORA
Mohammad Zianal Abedin.
An article in an Indian magazine 'Frontline' (Volume 22 - Issue 13, Jun 18- Jul 01, 2005,Homage to a hero), contributed by a Bangladeshi journalist Haroon Habib,under the caption 'Homage to a hero' drew my attention. Myfellow-journalist Harron Habib left no stone unturned to praise Gen. Arorafor his heroic (?) deeds. Haroon expressed his anguish seeing the passivemood of many quarters, including the ruling elites, for their failure inpaying homage to Arora who died on May 3. The write-up of Haroon Habib could be excellent one, if he could be impartial and could also try to explore and unearth the reason, why the Bangladeshis in general refrained from paying sincere tribute to Arora. The reason is this that the role of Arora and his associates was heroic for India, but not for Bangladesh, rather it was a curse for Bangladesh and its people. His death was condoled by those who are known in Bangladesh as pro-Indian elements. Observers, who monitored those condolence meetings, found the speakers engaged in competitions in pleasing India more than paying homage to Arora. Indian High Commission in Dhaka is alleged to have sponsored almost all the meetings orgrainsed by various parties and groups. None of the condolence meetings was spontaneous. Most of the organisers and speakers were supposed to do so, as they are overtly and covertly aligned to and benefited by India.
Haroon Habib praised Arora for his unique command over his troops in keeping them disciplined. But his comment is beyond reality. There is no evidence as to what the General did to stop his soldiers from looting. He was either a failed commander who miserably failed to impose discipline and supervision in the conduct of his troops when they resorted to stealing the assets of the country they allegedly came to liberate. The failure to prevent this full scale looting actually planted the first seed of anti-India feeling in the hearts of the Bangladeshis. One expatiate Bangladeshi, Tuhin Reza,alleged that he failed to impose discipline on his troops that paved the way for looting. But the ground reality that I saw in Dhaka just after December 16, 1971, shows that the looting was open and concerted, something, as if,by official instruction. It was not a failure. It was his instruction. Not only the dwelling houses or shops of Dhaka and other major urban areas of Bangladesh, were looted, but also mills and factories, stores of jute, cotton and food grains, and all other things. The looted materials were sent to India loading hundreds of thousands of military lorries and trucks and ship. Individual soldier could steal one or two fancy or attractive items, but how thousands of trucks and vessels loaded with different types of articles and goods could ply to India, if Arora and his bosses in New Delhi had not instructed to do so.
Haoon Habib regretfully said that the role of Arora was distorted in Bangladesh. Haroon Habib opined, "Despite the distortions, one particular photograph of the country's history cannot be erased. The historic picture shows Lt. Gen. A.A.K. Niazi signing the instrument of surrender in front of Lt. Gen. J.S.Arora at Dhaka's Ramna Race Course." But Mr. Haroon failed to comprehend that this very picture of singing ceremony also itself is the evidence and document of Indian conspiracy in denying the role and sacrifice of freedom fighters of Bangladesh and its people. Where was the representation of Bangladesh in the signing ceremony? Why Gen. M. A. G. Osmany, the commamander in chief of the Banglasesh forces was not allowed to remain present in the signing ceremony, who could be co-signatories? Denying the signature of Osmany or any other legalrepresentative of the then Revolutionary government of Bangladesh, India itself denied our liberation war. It is alleged that Gen. Osmany was not allowed to reach Dhaka even to attend the ceremony. India instructed Arora to goalone to sign the surrendering instrument wanted to establish its claim that it was a war between India and Pakistan.India denied our sacrifice in the very dawn of ourliberation. India wants to claim that our independence was a gift of India.
Those who pay homage to a looter named Arora, indirectly tune to Indian line and accept Indian claim. Mr. Hroon should have known that Indian Army celebrates the 16th December as Vijay Divas(victory day) of the Eastern command of India over Pakistan. By doing so India denies the victory day of Bangladesh. Arora was sent to invade and capture Bangladesh, to pave the way for unhindered looting and the Indian soldiers under the command of Arora did it for days. For this reason no representation was allowed in he signing ceremony. To a real patriotic Bangladesh Arora and Indian soldiers in 1971 in Bangladesh were invaders and looters not savier or liberator as claimed by Haroon Habib. Arora and his Indian associates assisted the liberation war not to liberate us, but to crush the Muslim power in the subcontinent and enslave us under Indian cage. Indian Army fought in 1971 to invade and capture Bangladesh and keep it under
occupation. I would request Mr. Haroon to collect the last interview of Indian late President Zail Singh published in the 'Sunday' magazine (now defunct) of Calcutta, where he said, that withdrawl of the Indian soldiers from Bangladesh was a blunder.
During the war of liberation I was trained in India. I was twenty years in 1971 and the Vice president of a government college student's union. I wrote and staged a drama at Halflong Camp of Assam in India.I enjoyed close confidence of many leading Awami League and Chattra League some of whom were unfortunately infiltrated by RAW to float Mujib Bahini. I rushed to Dhaka five days after the surrender to visit my elder brother's house in Kachukhat area (adjucent to Dhaka Cantonment).I personally saw the looting of the Indian soldiers. Elderly people of Dhaka of those days still alive and they can give vivid description how massive looting occurred after December 16. Those who praise India or Arora can talk to them to get the real picture of looting. They may like to study the descriptions of looting provided by many eyewitnesses, including a Sector commander Major Abdul Jalil, who bid to deter shipment of Bangladeshi goods to India.
Major Jalil(an ex-Armoured officer who deflected from Pakistan Army or was on leave on 25 March 1971) was arrested and put to Indian jail for his offence of obstructing the unhindered plundering of Bangladeshi assets. Once Mujib returned back from Pakistan on his request Major Jalil was sent back to Bangladesh authority and soon he was Court Martialed by the own Govt. Curfews were imposed in the name of security to cover the looting/plundering. Indian soldiers looted whatever they got even the taps of wash basins and spoons. Harrun Habib and others, who paid homage to Arora and treat India as a friend of 1971, are well aware of the looting, but they buried those memories and evidence to secure their self-interest. I humbly request this group of people to ask their conscience a question. Where did the arms,ammunition , military vehicles , equipment, warplanes etc of Pakistan Army go? By looting the costly military hardware India crippled the nacsent Bangladesh army. India did it to make us permanently dependent on India.
Indian conspiracy did not end there. Her subsequent behaviour with Bangladesh since 1972 was more heinous and open that proves that she cannot be our real and trusted friend. The envious and inimical, expansionist and big brotherly attitude of the India for the last 34 years manifest the covert plan and design why the Aroras showed their overt friendliness in 1971. Other than plundering in 1971, India's post-'71 anti-Bangladesh steps prove that the Aroras did not help us, but made the way to exploit and
squeeze us, to grab and annex us finally in their bid to make 'Akhand Bharat'. India illegally blockades the water of the international rivers during the dry season and floods Bangladesh in the rainy season to cause it economically, ecologically and environmentally devasted. India's hidden and open role in sheltering and nursing the Bangladeshi terrorists and secessionists, creating unrest and insatiability in political and educational arenas, constructing barbed wire fence and killing inocent people along the international border, smuggling etc are some of her friendy attitude towards Bangladesh. Indian ruined our basic industries to make Bangladesh her bonded market.
Besides, the atrocities of BSF (Border Security Forces) in the border, procrastination in resolving the bilateral disputes ,violating the bilateral treaties and agreements, undue influence in the internal affairs of Bangladesh, sabotage and subversive activities, anti-Bangladesh propaganda only branded India as an unfriendly country. How all these ugly anti-Bangladesh activities could inspire a patriot to pay homage to Arora or Indira Gandhi?
But the common people of Bangladesh do not find any logic to praise the Indians. Even the illiterate Bangladeshis understand the overt and covet designs of India against Bangladesh. It is strange why some literate persons who even claim themselves as the champions and vanguards of liberation war and its spirit failed to comprehend the heinous designs of India against Bangladesh. India nurses such people in Bangladesh to implement her nefarious blueprints. I feel pity for these people
.http://bangladesh-web.com/view.php?h...00000000096648
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mohammad Zianal Abedin.
An article in an Indian magazine 'Frontline' (Volume 22 - Issue 13, Jun 18- Jul 01, 2005,Homage to a hero), contributed by a Bangladeshi journalist Haroon Habib,under the caption 'Homage to a hero' drew my attention. Myfellow-journalist Harron Habib left no stone unturned to praise Gen. Arorafor his heroic (?) deeds. Haroon expressed his anguish seeing the passivemood of many quarters, including the ruling elites, for their failure inpaying homage to Arora who died on May 3. The write-up of Haroon Habib could be excellent one, if he could be impartial and could also try to explore and unearth the reason, why the Bangladeshis in general refrained from paying sincere tribute to Arora. The reason is this that the role of Arora and his associates was heroic for India, but not for Bangladesh, rather it was a curse for Bangladesh and its people. His death was condoled by those who are known in Bangladesh as pro-Indian elements. Observers, who monitored those condolence meetings, found the speakers engaged in competitions in pleasing India more than paying homage to Arora. Indian High Commission in Dhaka is alleged to have sponsored almost all the meetings orgrainsed by various parties and groups. None of the condolence meetings was spontaneous. Most of the organisers and speakers were supposed to do so, as they are overtly and covertly aligned to and benefited by India.
Haroon Habib praised Arora for his unique command over his troops in keeping them disciplined. But his comment is beyond reality. There is no evidence as to what the General did to stop his soldiers from looting. He was either a failed commander who miserably failed to impose discipline and supervision in the conduct of his troops when they resorted to stealing the assets of the country they allegedly came to liberate. The failure to prevent this full scale looting actually planted the first seed of anti-India feeling in the hearts of the Bangladeshis. One expatiate Bangladeshi, Tuhin Reza,alleged that he failed to impose discipline on his troops that paved the way for looting. But the ground reality that I saw in Dhaka just after December 16, 1971, shows that the looting was open and concerted, something, as if,by official instruction. It was not a failure. It was his instruction. Not only the dwelling houses or shops of Dhaka and other major urban areas of Bangladesh, were looted, but also mills and factories, stores of jute, cotton and food grains, and all other things. The looted materials were sent to India loading hundreds of thousands of military lorries and trucks and ship. Individual soldier could steal one or two fancy or attractive items, but how thousands of trucks and vessels loaded with different types of articles and goods could ply to India, if Arora and his bosses in New Delhi had not instructed to do so.
Haoon Habib regretfully said that the role of Arora was distorted in Bangladesh. Haroon Habib opined, "Despite the distortions, one particular photograph of the country's history cannot be erased. The historic picture shows Lt. Gen. A.A.K. Niazi signing the instrument of surrender in front of Lt. Gen. J.S.Arora at Dhaka's Ramna Race Course." But Mr. Haroon failed to comprehend that this very picture of singing ceremony also itself is the evidence and document of Indian conspiracy in denying the role and sacrifice of freedom fighters of Bangladesh and its people. Where was the representation of Bangladesh in the signing ceremony? Why Gen. M. A. G. Osmany, the commamander in chief of the Banglasesh forces was not allowed to remain present in the signing ceremony, who could be co-signatories? Denying the signature of Osmany or any other legalrepresentative of the then Revolutionary government of Bangladesh, India itself denied our liberation war. It is alleged that Gen. Osmany was not allowed to reach Dhaka even to attend the ceremony. India instructed Arora to goalone to sign the surrendering instrument wanted to establish its claim that it was a war between India and Pakistan.India denied our sacrifice in the very dawn of ourliberation. India wants to claim that our independence was a gift of India.
Those who pay homage to a looter named Arora, indirectly tune to Indian line and accept Indian claim. Mr. Hroon should have known that Indian Army celebrates the 16th December as Vijay Divas(victory day) of the Eastern command of India over Pakistan. By doing so India denies the victory day of Bangladesh. Arora was sent to invade and capture Bangladesh, to pave the way for unhindered looting and the Indian soldiers under the command of Arora did it for days. For this reason no representation was allowed in he signing ceremony. To a real patriotic Bangladesh Arora and Indian soldiers in 1971 in Bangladesh were invaders and looters not savier or liberator as claimed by Haroon Habib. Arora and his Indian associates assisted the liberation war not to liberate us, but to crush the Muslim power in the subcontinent and enslave us under Indian cage. Indian Army fought in 1971 to invade and capture Bangladesh and keep it under
occupation. I would request Mr. Haroon to collect the last interview of Indian late President Zail Singh published in the 'Sunday' magazine (now defunct) of Calcutta, where he said, that withdrawl of the Indian soldiers from Bangladesh was a blunder.
During the war of liberation I was trained in India. I was twenty years in 1971 and the Vice president of a government college student's union. I wrote and staged a drama at Halflong Camp of Assam in India.I enjoyed close confidence of many leading Awami League and Chattra League some of whom were unfortunately infiltrated by RAW to float Mujib Bahini. I rushed to Dhaka five days after the surrender to visit my elder brother's house in Kachukhat area (adjucent to Dhaka Cantonment).I personally saw the looting of the Indian soldiers. Elderly people of Dhaka of those days still alive and they can give vivid description how massive looting occurred after December 16. Those who praise India or Arora can talk to them to get the real picture of looting. They may like to study the descriptions of looting provided by many eyewitnesses, including a Sector commander Major Abdul Jalil, who bid to deter shipment of Bangladeshi goods to India.
Major Jalil(an ex-Armoured officer who deflected from Pakistan Army or was on leave on 25 March 1971) was arrested and put to Indian jail for his offence of obstructing the unhindered plundering of Bangladeshi assets. Once Mujib returned back from Pakistan on his request Major Jalil was sent back to Bangladesh authority and soon he was Court Martialed by the own Govt. Curfews were imposed in the name of security to cover the looting/plundering. Indian soldiers looted whatever they got even the taps of wash basins and spoons. Harrun Habib and others, who paid homage to Arora and treat India as a friend of 1971, are well aware of the looting, but they buried those memories and evidence to secure their self-interest. I humbly request this group of people to ask their conscience a question. Where did the arms,ammunition , military vehicles , equipment, warplanes etc of Pakistan Army go? By looting the costly military hardware India crippled the nacsent Bangladesh army. India did it to make us permanently dependent on India.
Indian conspiracy did not end there. Her subsequent behaviour with Bangladesh since 1972 was more heinous and open that proves that she cannot be our real and trusted friend. The envious and inimical, expansionist and big brotherly attitude of the India for the last 34 years manifest the covert plan and design why the Aroras showed their overt friendliness in 1971. Other than plundering in 1971, India's post-'71 anti-Bangladesh steps prove that the Aroras did not help us, but made the way to exploit and
squeeze us, to grab and annex us finally in their bid to make 'Akhand Bharat'. India illegally blockades the water of the international rivers during the dry season and floods Bangladesh in the rainy season to cause it economically, ecologically and environmentally devasted. India's hidden and open role in sheltering and nursing the Bangladeshi terrorists and secessionists, creating unrest and insatiability in political and educational arenas, constructing barbed wire fence and killing inocent people along the international border, smuggling etc are some of her friendy attitude towards Bangladesh. Indian ruined our basic industries to make Bangladesh her bonded market.
Besides, the atrocities of BSF (Border Security Forces) in the border, procrastination in resolving the bilateral disputes ,violating the bilateral treaties and agreements, undue influence in the internal affairs of Bangladesh, sabotage and subversive activities, anti-Bangladesh propaganda only branded India as an unfriendly country. How all these ugly anti-Bangladesh activities could inspire a patriot to pay homage to Arora or Indira Gandhi?
But the common people of Bangladesh do not find any logic to praise the Indians. Even the illiterate Bangladeshis understand the overt and covet designs of India against Bangladesh. It is strange why some literate persons who even claim themselves as the champions and vanguards of liberation war and its spirit failed to comprehend the heinous designs of India against Bangladesh. India nurses such people in Bangladesh to implement her nefarious blueprints. I feel pity for these people
.http://bangladesh-web.com/view.php?h...00000000096648
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last edited:
Abu Zolfiqar
Rest in Peace
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2009
- Messages
- 22,555
- Reaction score
- 22
- Country
- Location
it's comical how the indian posted this thread, and seems most Bengalis are abusing him for it and Pakistanis are quite care-free..
very telling signs....
Pakistanis have moved on. We accepted Bangladesh long ago. I don't think innocent West Pakistanis or Pro-Pakistan Bengalis and religious figures who were around in those days are saying the same ''thank you'' considering many of them were killed RUTHLESSLY by mobs --but of course the biased author wont pay attention to them. That would be too inconvenient.
''meh'' !
very telling signs....
Pakistanis have moved on. We accepted Bangladesh long ago. I don't think innocent West Pakistanis or Pro-Pakistan Bengalis and religious figures who were around in those days are saying the same ''thank you'' considering many of them were killed RUTHLESSLY by mobs --but of course the biased author wont pay attention to them. That would be too inconvenient.
''meh'' !
- Status
Similar threads
