Bangladesh: Fighting Fasicm in the form of Secularism

[T-Rex]

In Bangladesh the seculars are the representation of fascism. They want to wipe out their opponents by hook or by crook. They seek to prevent their opponents who have the support of most of the people from participating in the elections. They demand that their supporters be in the election commission and other sensitive government posts, if that does not happen they cry ‘foul’. When their people are in the proper places what do they do, here’s one example of that:

The Daily Sangram

 

[TruthSeeker]

Couldn't read your link, it must not be in English. How extensive are the "secularists" in Bangladesh? I mean, what percentage of the population? Does Bangladesh have the right to the free practice of various religions, as a constitutional right, or is Islam a state religion? Are the secularists agitating for "freedom of religion" or for removing Islam as a state religion?

 

[BanglaBhoot]

Yes it is probably in Bangla. I think T-Rex can provide a short summary of the text in English.

 

[T-Rex]

Yes it is probably in Bangla. I think T-Rex can provide a short summary of the text in English.

This is the summary of the text:
"In this year's election it has been decided that those who are bank defaulters they won’t be allowed to be candidates in the forthcoming general election. The DC or district commissioners have been authorized to cancel or withheld nomination of candidates if they are found to be bank defaulters. In Shirajganj-4 the candidate of the four party alliance is JI’s Moulana Rafiqul Islam. Now Moulana Rafiqul Islam has no account with the Sonali Bank of Bangladesh, but there is another man named Soyaad Rafiqul Islam who took a loan from Sonali bank and defaulted on the loan. Moulana Rafiqul Islam does not have the title Soyaad with his name, besides Moulana Rafiqul’s father is alive while the father of Soyaad Rafiqul Islam is deceased. The addresses and photos on the voter ID of Moulana Rafiqul Islam and Soyaad Rafiqul Islam are also different. So, it was pointed out to the election commission by the representative of Moulana Rafiqul Islam that Moulana Rafiqul Islam and Soyaad Rafiqul Islam were two different people. In spite of these discrepancies in the identities of Moulana Rafiqul Islam and Soyaad Rafiqul Islam, the DC of Shirajganj, who is known as a staunch supporter of Awami League, announced the name of Moulana Rafiqul Islam as a bank defaulter and withheld his nomination."

 

[BanglaBhoot]

So this is the type of trickery and under hand tactics AL will use to come to power. All Bangladeshis must be aware of this nefarious plan.

 

[T-Rex]

Couldn't read your link, it must not be in English. How extensive are the "secularists" in Bangladesh? I mean, what percentage of the population? Does Bangladesh have the right to the free practice of various religions, as a constitutional right, or is Islam a state religion? Are the secularists agitating for "freedom of religion" or for removing Islam as a state religion?

The seculars seek to ban Islamists from politics. The question is if the seculars are so certain of their support in Bangladesh why do they demand the banning of other political parties ? Is it the true democratic spirit or is it the spirit of fascism ? If people want to vote for certain candidate what right do the seculars have to ban that candidate ? Who has given that right to the seculars ? If a candidate is bad for some reason people have the right to reject him by not voting for him, it is the right of the voters in democracy and those who want to deprive people of their right to vote for whomever they like, whatever they may call themselves, they cannot be called democratic in true sense; in every sense, they are fascists.

 

[M_Saint]

In spite of these discrepancies in the identities of Moulana Rafiqul Islam and Soyaad Rafiqul Islam, the DC of Shirajganj, who is known as a staunch supporter of Awami League, announced the name of Moulana Rafiqul Islam as a bank defaulter and withheld his nomination."

Please note that DC's had played a major role in making AL winner in 96 election. It was revealed by those DCs, who had changed the outcome of that election after AL goons started to show their real faces. Similarly in 70's election only 27% votes was registered and Hindus voted multiple times for AL, who were the dominant political forces at that time. Furthermore, AL's sweeping victory was secured through international conspiracy to create an out cry for separation while Yahya's real concern for LFO was deliberately down played. So, AL actually never won any popular elections by unbiased measure in the past and it was out of question now, since public were many folds aware than 70s or 96. That was the only/main reason to foil 2007's elction, end of the story.

 

[Vanguard_786]

Yawn :: another failed state on our borders !! Just the place to send the mother-in-law

 

[BanglaBhoot]

Yawn :: another failed state on our borders !! Just the place to send the mother-in-law

Oh have a look in the mirror ....

India is where we send our in-laws.......they must be the illegal immigrants you keep talking about ....

 

[Vanguard_786]

Oh have a look in the mirror ....

India is where we send our in-laws.......they must be the illegal immigrants you keep talking about ....

Given half a chance, you would also scram to come to India !! BTW, will check up sonarbangla travels for a one way ticket to Dhaka for the monsters - in-laws .. The collective IQ's of both countries will go up

 

[T-Rex]

Given half a chance, you would also scram to come to India !! BTW, will check up sonarbangla travels for a one way ticket to Dhaka for the monsters - in-laws .. The collective IQ's of both countries will go up

Perhaps you should talk about the principles of democracy instead of vomitting your craps because the thread is "Fascism in the form of Secularism" not "monster-in-laws". Do you believe in true democracy ? It seems you are an advocate of fake democracy where the minority rules, and of course, in the name of democracy.