Bengal71
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2018
- Messages
- 4,535
- Reaction score
- -11
- Country
- Location
B for Begger, B for Bangladesh
@WebMaster @Horus @Dubious @Oscar
This is totally unprovoked and uncalled for so this as$hole should be banned permanently so that he stays in his shit hole called Bd.
Nope, history is full of conflicts where a smaller foe has outclassed a bigger foe on the field of battle, and that includes times where relatively modern weapons were being used. One good example is when German forces, even though heavily outnumbered and technologically unmatched managed to turn the tables on the British expeditionary force and the might of the French army, taking France and by default Western Europe.
Pakistan is a match conventionally. It's not simply about counting how many tanks or guns each side has. Also remember Pakistan has a far smaller space to defend.
I understand but the economy and the industrial backbone must support a war machine. India can go on for far longer than Pakistan can because of it's sheer size and resources. In a defensive scenario, Pakistan probably can withstand for a considerable time, but after that bigger size will win. Of course that can be averted by use of nukes but we are talking about conventional here.
Since when was 65 a defeat? Do you realise Kargil was fought with infantry from Pakistan's side and India used full force of combined arms and still lost more men and material.
Your love for India has clouded your rational.
65 was not a defeat or win. It was both parties went back with claim of victory. Bengalis fought in 65 and fought very gallantly.