What's new

Bahrain-Saudi Arabia union ‘meant to save US Navy base’

Federer

BANNED
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
A possible attack on Iran would require a fully-prepared US Fifth Fleet, even as its host country Bahrain is engulfed in a public uprising. A solution comes after the island nation trumpeted a future formal union with its mighty ally Saudi Arabia.

*A possible move for political integration between Manama and Riyadh was announced on Monday, as Saudi Arabia hosted a Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) meeting. Uniting just two nations of the six-strong bloc would be much easier than hammering out a union between all the Sunni-ruled monarchies.

For Bahrain, forming some sort of confederation with the strongest member of the GCC may become a solution for the ongoing political crisis. The country’s Shiite majority has been demanding constitutional reforms and an elected government since December 2011. GCC nations provided their troops to Bahrain to quell the uprising in its peak, but it did not simply go away.

GCC countries’ major regional rival Iran branded the move as an “American plan to annex Bahrain to Saudi Arabia,” and called on Iranian Shiites to take to the streets on Friday in protest against it.

Bahrain lashed out at Tehran for what was termed “Iranian interference in the affairs of the kingdom” by Foreign Minister Sheikh Khaled bin Ahmad Al-Khalifa.

“What Iranians say is not paranoid or far-fetched at all. Bahrain itself is a US naval base. They could easily, if they so desired, have a democratic regime there. But the problem with allowing democracy is that a democratic government could then tell the US to get out. So it suits the United States to have this tiny little despotism and a larger despotism in Saudi Arabia,” Middle East expert Tariq Ali told RT.

The announcement of a potential union came just days after Washington renewed supplying arms to Bahrain, which was halted on October due to the violent crackdown of protests by Manama.

The move provoked criticism from human rights groups and some US politicians and Bahraini opposition.

Riyadh voiced the idea that GCC should go for a closer political, economic and military integration after three decades of existence back in December. The plan however has seen few steps forward, as the council’s members have a variety of considerations for such a move, ranging from the smaller members’ fear of losing their identity to religious differences between the Sunni regimes.

Oman, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates reportedly mounted the strongest objections to the union. Bahrain’s current enthusiasm for a bilateral alliance with Saudi Arabia is partially explained by the already great influence that Riyadh has over the troubled tiny island state. A formal union would largely seal the status quo. But the plan has its own flaws for Saudi Arabia, Ali says.

“What the Saudis don’t realize, because they are masters of the present moment, is that were they to incorporate Bahrain into a so-called confederation, effectively swallowing it up and making it into a puppet state, the large population of Bahrainis that they would inherit would undoubtedly link up with dissidents and people fed up with Saudi monarchy inside Saudi Arabia itself,” he explained.

Domestic turmoil may be something Saudi Arabia cannot afford at the moment, says Professor Seyed Mohammad Marandi, from the University of Tehran.

Bahrain-Saudi Arabia union
 
GCC union talks have already failed..the cultural and ethinic differences in GCC are too wide to advocate a merger. At best it can survive like a trade union on EU model. Much of the small GCC countries are wary of Saudi and UAE influences - the two heavy weights of GCC and turning into a virtual proxy of wider Arab vs Arab tussle. This fear is what actually motives smaller GCC nations like Qatar, Kuwait and even UAE up to an extent to be on better trade terms with Iran - even if political hostility sustains.
 
GCC union talks have already failed..the cultural and ethinic differences in GCC are too wide to advocate a merger. At best it can survive like a trade union on EU model. Much of the small GCC countries are wary of Saudi and UAE influences - the two heavy weights of GCC and turning into a virtual proxy of wider Arab vs Arab tussle. This fear is what actually motives smaller GCC nations like Qatar, Kuwait and even UAE up to an extent to be on better trade terms with Iran - even if political hostility sustains.

Ummm it didn't fail sorry to inform you. Only Oman is refusing. All other cow tries have shown full support for it however KSA is going for the all or nothing meaning until December this year a whole lot of pressure will be put on Oman from both people and other GCC countries to join.
 
Ummm it didn't fail sorry to inform you. Only Oman is refusing. All other cow tries have shown full support for it however KSA is going for the all or nothing meaning until December this year a whole lot of pressure will be put on Oman from both people and other GCC countries to join.

GCC states fail to agree on union at Riyadh summit - Politics & Economics - ArabianBusiness.com

Oman is exclusively inhabited by Baluchi and people of Iranian descend. There is nothing Khaleeji or Arabic about them..They dont even adhere to Shia or Sunni sect which is again another divisive factor.

The same applies to Bahrain & Qatar where the culture and population is more Persian than Arab. They are only Arab linguistically..

Then is the UAE vs KSA tussle the two heavy weight of GCC.
 
at least egypt-syria union was for a noble cause - arabs have become smaller creatures since the days of great visionaries and revolutionaries and are now in defense of petty monarchists who are in turn anglo-american-jewish running dogs
 
GCC states fail to agree on union at Riyadh summit - Politics & Economics - ArabianBusiness.com

Oman is exclusively inhabited by Baluchi and people of Iranian descend. There is nothing Khaleeji or Arabic about them..They dont even adhere to Shia or Sunni sect which is again another divisive factor.

The same applies to Bahrain & Qatar where the culture and population is more Persian than Arab. They are only Arab linguistically..

Then is the UAE vs KSA tussle the two heavy weight of GCC.

We will wait until December to see if it failed or not deal??
 
The talks didn't fail. It was a very strong and promising start for a bright future for these countries. In fact, just breaking the barrier to publically plan the union of these countries is enough backbone to support this union and it did give the green lights to groups in these countries to hold meetings and discuss procedure for union.

The governments in the GCC should and will unify enshallah for many reasons which are not only political. The union will strengthen them in many levels, economically, militarily, and politically. In addition, the vast majority of the people in the region is well connected and shares a lot of cultural and values similarities. In fact, many of them go back to the same tribes. The union is going to happen; it is a matter of time and efforts.

The Union won't affect the life styles in each of the countries. This will be a potential federal like union where the military, foreign policies, and economy are unified to support each of these countries. This will reflect positively on all of the GCC countries and the lives of the people. Some people may argue that there are different divisions in Oman or Bahrain having different backgrounds but who doesn't? All countries have different divisions within themselves. The point is not to unify for that reason solely but for the previously mentioned key reasons.
 
an3m1.com_ec9e6772261.jpg







I'm just wondering why some people aren't happy for us in this regards when they can't shut their mouths taking about unity all the time :disagree: . this an example of unity not only based on mutual interests wither economy, politicly, military and so on but also, cultural similarity and homogeneity.
 
Let us say there will be a merger. I wonder how power would be allocated. Not to forget there are rights in Bahrain, Kuwait, and in UAE that are not so same as Saudi Arabia. Any idea how things will work out>>>???

The only merger i can see among middle east countries is : Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, UAE

Rest of the lot including: Yemen, Iraq, Egypt, Morocco, Algeria, Libya, Tunisia, Palestine, Syria, Lebanon doesnt seem possible. They have distinct forms of governments (non-monarchs), culturally different people, and some even not Arab enough ethnically.
 
Oman is exclusively inhabited by Baluchi and people of Iranian descend. There is nothing Khaleeji or Arabic about them..They dont even adhere to Shia or Sunni sect which is again another divisive factor.

The same applies to Bahrain & Qatar where the culture and population is more Persian than Arab. They are only Arab linguistically..

.
WTF!!!!!!
Your stupidity never fails to amaze me.
 
After Bahrain, Qatar has more shia Arabs. I will agree with Somebozo, People are inclined toward Iran here
 
The talks didn't fail. It was a very strong and promising start for a bright future for these countries. In fact, just breaking the barrier to publically plan the union of these countries is enough backbone to support this union and it did give the green lights to groups in these countries to hold meetings and discuss procedure for union.

The governments in the GCC should and will unify enshallah for many reasons which are not only political. The union will strengthen them in many levels, economically, militarily, and politically. In addition, the vast majority of the people in the region is well connected and shares a lot of cultural and values similarities. In fact, many of them go back to the same tribes. The union is going to happen; it is a matter of time and efforts.

The Union won't affect the life styles in each of the countries. This will be a potential federal like union where the military, foreign policies, and economy are unified to support each of these countries. This will reflect positively on all of the GCC countries and the lives of the people. Some people may argue that there are different divisions in Oman or Bahrain having different backgrounds but who doesn't? All countries have different divisions within themselves. The point is not to unify for that reason solely but for the previously mentioned key reasons.

the saudi wet dream of a universal arabic monarchy, unfortunately, has to be underwritten financially by anglo-saxons and militarily by jews. this makes it the most laughable and spineless universal monarchy yet to date in human history.
 
the saudi wet dream of a universal arabic monarchy, unfortunately, has to be underwritten financially by anglo-saxons and militarily by jews. this makes it the most laughable and spineless universal monarchy yet to date in human history.

Since people are content with this unification, what's with you? I mean it's really non of your business man! Do you think we live under brutal dictatorship like your Chinese communist rule? for your info, there is a common dream among all Arabs, which is unification under one rule, one nation and one people.
 
Since people are content with this unification, what's with you? I mean it's really non of your business man! Do you think we live under brutal dictatorship like your Chinese communist rule? for your info, there is a common dream among all Arabs, which is unification under one rule, one nation and one people.

of course arabic peoples historically aspired to a unified state. but there is a difference between a nasserist project and one designed by the petty saudi royalty. the former might restore glory and honor to the arabic world; the latter still more medieval ignorance, religious intolerance, economic exploitation, and political repression under the yoke of a vicious, bloodthirsty saudi monarchy. moreover, the last union of two arabic nations served the cause of palestine, and this one proposed here served the cause of zionists who may well be the military sponsor of your anti-persia conspiracy and who will ask you to sell out palestinians first (but you already have, haven't you, arab?)

that is how low the petty arabs have sunken to in the past few decades. none of a chinese' business, except we will sell arms to your enemies until we see your destruction and can laugh at the carcass of your monarchy.
 
Back
Top Bottom