Babur-III, MIRV - Changing the strategic game in South Asia?

[cerberus]

Whatever they have sufficient to send Indian back to Vedic era, you don't know but military planners from Indian very well aware of this fact.

Change your pampers and have cerilac, go for sleep.

Mr To destroy a big city like delhi you need a megaton level nuke

Not kiloton patka's

I rest my case

This is not an mature statement and if someone fails doesn't means that others can't make it. By your logic we can say that since Russian can't make AESA so how can Israel make AESA?. So Israel claim wrong and they also don't have armed drone as well. Pakistan also don't have armed drone because Russia can't make it

How many pratical nuclear test you conducted again ??

 

[Dhara]

A person how is dreaming or has delusion to arm a cruise missile with MiRV tech worth to igno

Mr To destroy a big city like delhi you need a megaton level nuke

Not kiloton patka's

I rest my case

They have tested 300Kt design of impulsion type warhead rest live in delusion.

A person how is dreaming or has delusion to arm a cruise missile with MiRV tech worth to ignore.

 

[My-Analogous]

Mr To destroy a big city like Delhi you need a megaton level nuke

Not kiloton patka's

I rest my case


How many pratical nuclear test you conducted again ??

Wrong question. Correct question is when Pakistan claim partial nuclear test? the answer is when time comes as we didn't show many things till when out think tanks give go a head signal.

 

[cerberus]

Yes, and you just said in previous comment that a Neutron bomb is ERW?
So there you go, your conundrum solved. Making a staged fission fusion device which can emit lots of high energy neutrons is possible without alien tech as you put it,and Pakistan has that technology since long.
Nasr uses such a warhead which emits very large amount of high energy neutrons.
The design on Babur is different and much harder to produce as any cruise missile based Nuke comes very near to the crew onboard and has to use a very special type of Plutonium which is much difficult to make.

Even Russian are not able to produce a warhead Like w80 or 84 successfully pakistan is far behind

Let me know when its done Within this century with limited Piratical Live test simulations you have

They have tested 300Kt design of impulsion type warhead rest live in delusion.

Source ??

Wrong question. Correct question is when Pakistan claim partial nuclear test? the answer is when time comes as we didn't show many things till when out think tanks give go a head signal.

Sirji do you know about W80 type warhead or just shooting things in air

Its yield between 5 and 200KT Specially designed for BGM-109 Tomahawk

 

[Safriz]

Even Russian are not able to produce a warhead Like w80 or 84 successfully pakistan is far behind

Let me know when its done Within this century with limited Piratical Live test simulations you have


Source ??


Sirji do you know about W80 type warhead or just shooting things in air

Its yield between 5 and 200KT

For Russians it wasn't due to technology limitations but war doctrine.
They did have small tactical nuclear warheads during Cuban missile crisis. Read about it.
But their war doctrine was about going big , so they didn't want to make small nukes.
Pakistani situation is different, our enemy is next doors so we can go with small nukes if many types.

 

[Army research]

Having sub kiloton nukes is different thing and

W80 like warhead different thing
Please go through about w80 and w84 type of warheads

Unless pakistan has SLBMs you have no credible second poweful medium of secind strikes

I'm not questioning that , Pakistan doesn't need them, what we will use our current 450 km cruise missile if it is used with nukes , say potentially 2-3 whatever yield launched at mumbai? It will surely cause destruction

 

[cerberus]

For Russians it wasn't due to technology limitations but war doctrine.
They did have small tactical nuclear warheads during Cuban missile crisis. Read about it.
But their war doctrine was about going big , so they didn't want to make small nukes.
Pakistani situation is different, our enemy is next doors so we can go with small nukes if many types.

Really why they made KH-55 & Klubs Series for then ?
What about Chinese then there is No Major Nuclear power Except US Which has Able to designed warhead like W80 or W84 When today just like Stealth fighters

 

[Safriz]

Really why they made KH-55 & Klubs Series for then ?
What about Chinese then there is No Major Nuclear power Except US Which has Able to designed warhead like W80 or W84 When today just like Stealth fighters

Again. A matter of war doctrine, not technical ability

 

[cerberus]

I'm not questioning that , Pakistan doesn't need them, what we will use our current 450 km cruise missile if it is used with nukes , say potentially 2-3 whatever yield launched at mumbai? It will surely cause destruction

Do you think Its Deterrent Enough ??

A SLBM version shaheen missile which have warhead of 40 -50 Kiloton yield or Babur which has Low yield weapon Which will you Will choose was Option for credible deterrence i asked you genuinely

 

[Safriz]

Do you think Its Deterrent Enough ??

A SLBM version shaheen missile which have warhead of 40 -50 Kiloton yield or Babur which has Low yield weapon Which will you Will choose was Option for credible deterrence i asked you genuinely

Shaheen missile has 40-50 it warhead? Who told you that?

 

[cerberus]

Again. A matter of war doctrine, not technical ability

Not its Not Just Like other areas of technology what made Russians Stop is Budget to carry on R&D further

Chinese have Funds but they lack R&D

Though they made credible deterrent With Nuclear JL-2 SLBMS

No Major Nuclear power has made its Second Strike Deterrent On cruise missile But SLBMs

Shaheen missile has 40-50 it warhead? Who told you that?

Hypothetical situation ?? Option btw High yield BM or SLBM against Low yield Warhead CM or SLCM Which is preferable Second Strike Deterrence

 

[Safriz]

Not its Not Just Like other areas of technology what made Russians Stop is Budget to carry on R&D further

Chinese have Funds but they lack R&D

Though they made credible deterrent With Nuclear JL-2 SLBMS

No Major Nuclear power has made its Second Strike Deterrent On cruise missile But SLBMs

Well we have . So there.
Also SLCM babur isn't our only second strike capability. There are also highly mobile Ballistic missiles hidden away in mountains and secluded areas.

 

[cerberus]

Well we have . So there.
Also SLCM babur isn't our only second strike capability. There are also highly mobile Ballistic missiles hidden away in mountains and secluded areas.

Well We are discussing second strike Deterrent off course you have that Ability.Every Nuclear country has Silo's based striking ability

But in MAD they also Take Nuclear Submarines there preferable choice

Example :UK has Build its Entire Nuclear doctrine on Trident SLBMs and Vanguard class SSBNs

 

[karakoram]

Shaheen Missile,

You know difference between a ballistic and cruise missile?
Further you know MaRV and MiRV?

Only ballistic missile can house MaRV or MiRV,

While cruise missile meant to deliver single or sub-munition warheads,



Stupidity and ignorance at best.

@Icarus

How did you read shaheen missile name in urdu ? where are you from in india ?

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

How did you read shaheen missile name in urdu ? where are you from in india ?

Google translator.