What's new

Azerbaijan supports Saudi-led operation

because they already took 30% of your soil , so they don't want to risk what they took .... when you take back your territory , come and talk big ... killing soldiers in none aggressive situation is easy task ...

That statement is a testimony to the new balance of power. You still don't want to understand?

Azerbaijan is in midst of military build up, with military expenditures increased to 5 billion (not far behind the super big great superpower Iran, with faaar less population on the other hand). This kind of argument doesn't even makes sense because Azerbaijan are not sitting idle. But like the queer you are, you are going to repeat the same thing.
 
Last edited:
. . .
Meh, can you really negotiate with the Houthis though? I think that Hadi should come back to power as the legitimate president of Yemen. There's no way the Houthis will accept that. Only if the Saudis back him up with boots on the ground is there any chance of that happening.
 
.
Lol Azerbaijan would swallow Armenia in the first day if it wasnt for Russia... A direct involvement of Turkey would mean involvement of Russia which again would make everything worse for Azerbaijan, but Turkey gave military and logistics support though and closed the Border which lead to a complete isolation of Armenia.

The fear of Russia keeps Azerbaijan from liberating its land from Armenian occupation. Azerbaijan should liberate its territory and must not claim or occupy Armenia. The days of occupation and ethnic cleansing should not be repeated. Iranian support for Armenia is so illogical and even incompatible to their own policies.
 
.
@Kamil_baku

@Kamil_baku

Are you still going to talk positively about Iran? Bu itlərin necə danışdığını görürsən.
you turks are gathered and saying lies and acknowledge each other , then what can I say !?

yeah , it was fairy tail , and Karabagh was just a lie , in fact Azeri Turks invaded half of Armenia ....

CHeck out this video and see how many Armenians are killed in one fight.. This is the army my dad fighted for(north west of Azerbaijan) and they not even lost any area, but also occupied land from Armenia.
Also, the war was lost mainly for communication, because, simply anything your were told in the communication, nobody knew if it were Armenian propaganda or actually armenians. Thats why, even only end of war, Azerbaijan started to use talish(more farsi) minority language in communication so Armenians not to be able to understand.
Also, none of Azerbaijani were accepted to USSR army during to combat things, they were mostly done construction or other things, as it was their main policy to keep muslims from army trainings...

one more thing is, there were no army technology to fight... if you compare Azerbaijan to Armenia novadays, there gotta kidding me. As our defense minister mentioned a week ago, from the first punch, Armenia will lose 70% of its army capabilities. And think about the population and economic situation..
First, go talk about your country!
in 1999, Iran insisted that they will not let Azerbaiajn bring oil, but after Turkish fighters came to fly on baku, Iran simply never mentioned it again!!
WRMEA | Turkey Plays Big Brother to Azerbaijan in Opening Skirmishes Over Control of Caspian Resources
Turkey Plays Big Brother to Azerbaijan in Opening Skirmishes Over Control of Caspian Resources
By Jon Gorvett
It sounds like a riddle, but the question could have a far from funny answer. “When is a sea not a sea?” is the conundrum that has been occupying the minds of diplomats and generals from countries around the Caspian ever since the Soviet Union collapsed. Finally, in August, the repercussions of the various littoral states’ views on the answer threatened to go critical. In the middle of all this was Turkey, and its age-old rivalry with neighboring Iran.

The substance of the dispute, naturally enough, is very non-semantic. In Soviet days, the Caspian Sea was divided territorially along a national boundary between the Soviet Union and Iran. However, with the independence of Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan—all with Caspian coastlines—carving up the waters and what lies beneath them has turned into a so-far insoluble problem. If the Caspian is a sea, the Law of the Sea Convention would apply, establishing full maritime boundaries for the five littoral states bordering the Caspian according to an equidistant division of the sea—and its undersea resources—into national sectors.

If the Caspian is a lake, however, the rules change and the Caspian and its resources would have to be developed jointly—a division referred to as the “condominium approach.”

What gives this legalistic-sounding dispute its edge of course, is that the undersea—or “underlake”—resources could involve up to 250 billion barrels of oil and equally colossal amounts of natural gas. How much sea floor each state gets, therefore, is extremely significant, as is what kind of sea floor, with the areas that look to be holding the most energy reserves naturally being the most contested.

The five littoral states all have been trying to develop these resources in association with both foreign and domestic oil and gas companies. In addition, many out-of-area national governments—including the U.S. and Turkey—have seen it as in their interests to develop these resources in specific ways with specific nations. Central to Washington and Ankara is the Baku-Tiblisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline. This is projected to bring Azeri Caspian oil ashore at the Azeri capital of Baku, ship it northwest (going around Armenia) to the Georgian capital of Tiblisi, then bring it all the way south again to Turkey’s Mediterranean port of Ceyhan. This, U.S. and Turkish strategists hope, will serve to cement the three transit countries together, decrease Turkey’s current dependence on Russia for energy supplies, and do all this while keeping the Iranians—or the Russians—from dominating the region.

In order to satisfy political criteria, the economics largely have been forgotten.
The problem is that, in order to satisfy all these political criteria, the economics largely have been forgotten. The result is a projected pipeline that would most likely be prohibitively expensive, unless oil prices rocketed and stayed there, or unless the transit countries—or possibly the U.S.—stumped up a subsidy. With Georgia and Azerbaijan both economic black holes and Turkey in the midst of a financial crisis, it seems unlikely that the money will be generated locally.

In addition, the route has been in difficulties because the Azerbaijan International Operating Company (AIOC)—the consortium of oil corporations contracted to develop Azeri Caspian energy resources—is split on the issue. Led by BP-Amoco-ARCO, it also contains Russia’s Lukoil and Exxon-Mobil, both of which have extensive interests in rival pipelines. In addition, a recent huge oil discovery (25 billion to 40 billion barrels) at Kazakhstan’s Kashagan field, which is being developed by the French Total-Fina-Elf, and the successful completion of the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) route from the Kazakh Tengiz field to the Russian Black Sea port of Novorossisk have upstaged Baku-Tiblisi-Ceyhan dramatically.

Christophe de Margerie, head of Total-Fina-Elf’s upstream operations, also suggested recently that the Kashagan oil likely would go to Western markets via Iran. When asked about U.S. sanctions on Tehran, he replied, “Total was back in Iran in 1995 and did not fear punishment from Washington. We don’t intend to be provocative, but we will continue to rely on European and international laws.”

Iranian Maneuvers
With this background of international competition, then—and the apparent flagging of Turkish and U.S. hopes—this summer saw the first clear skirmish on the issue of physical control of Caspian resources.

On July 23, two Iranian air force planes overflew BP-Amoco-ARCO ships that were exploring the Caspian’s Araz-Alov-Sharg area, which is claimed by Azerbaijan. Iran maintains that this region—known to Tehran as the Alborz field—belongs within its sector. Later that evening, an Iranian warship entered what Baku considers Azeri territorial waters and threatened to fire on an Azeri oil exploration ship unless it departed the region. Iranian aircraft then reportedly violated Azeri airspace on three occasions.

These actions led Baku to summon the Iranian ambassador the following day and lodge a formal protest with Tehran. Iran’s Expediency Council secretary and former Revolutionary Guard chief, Mohsen Rezai, then “recalled” that “Azerbaijan belonged to Iran 150 years ago.”

Rezai’s remark set off a chorus of alarm bells in Ankara. Turkey has long been a close ally of Azerbaijan, with which it shares strong ethnic ties. And, with the Baku-Tiblisi-Ceyhan pipeline to consider, it has been closer than ever in recent years. Add in Turkey’s long-standing rivalry with Iran for regional influence, and it was not surprising that Ankara responded rapidly to Rezai’s implied threat. On Aug. 26 the chief of the politically powerful Turkish General Staff, Huseyin Kivrikoglu, arrived in Baku on an official visit, accompanied by 10 Turkish F-16 fighter jets, an action the Azeri newspaper Zerkalo suggested was “a warning” to Azerbaijan’s enemies.

It was certainly interpreted as such by Tehran, which demanded an official explanation from Turkey. Ankara responded that the visit was merely to celebrate the anniversary of Azerbaijan’s independence, though this new-found sovereignty seemed to be rather questionable when, upon Kivrikoglu’s arrival, Azeri President Haidar Aliyev announced that Turkey and Azerbaijan were “two countries, one nation.”

The incident quickly demonstrated how sensitive the Caspian is. The other big local player, of course, is Russia, which recently announced it no longer was keeping to the Soviet Union-era division of the sea between itself and Iran, calling forth a charge of “duplicity” from Tehran radio in July. Iran also points to the fact that, while elsewhere the once mighty Russian military has been contracting—if not falling apart—Moscow’s Caspian Sea Naval Flotilla has been expanding. This is certainly a worrisome point, as the sea in general is becoming rapidly more militarized. Turkmenistan recently also has swapped some of its gas rights for Russian patrol boats.

A summit of littoral states called for October in the Turkmen capital of Ashgabad was subsequently canceled, the issue of the Caspian’s status being the main subject for discussion.

Even though Turkey has no Caspian seashore, Ankara’s role in this dispute may prove to be a crucial one. It has long been the expressed aim of many in Ankara for the country to extend its influence eastward to the “Turkic states” of Central Asia, with an implied right to lead the millions of ethnic Turks who live in that vast geographical area. While Turkey may be assuming far too much, clearly the Azeris found it of considerable benefit to be able to call on their Turkic big brother. With the issue still far from being resolved, however, and all sides demonstrating their ability to rattle sabers, the Caspian looks set to remain a sea—or lake—of troubles for some time to come.

Jon Gorvett is a free-lance journalist based in Istanbul.

Lol Azerbaijan would swallow Armenia in the first day if it wasnt for Russia...


A direct involvement of Turkey would mean involvement of Russia which again would make everything worse for Azerbaijan, but Turkey gave military and logistics support though and closed the Border which lead to a complete isolation of Armenia.
they always find a reason against Azerbaijan..
Turkey denies fighting on contact line of Azerbaijani and Armenian troops another Armenian lie as there are Turkish soldiers that fight in the frontline..
I can simply say that, there are too many Azerbaijani that simply would love to go there to kill armenians..
They also fear, they know that any war, will be the end of their nation.. also, the last thing Russia wants a war in caucasus! it will spread to southern Russia if they join. Azerbaijan look small, but has big influence in the region, such as in Dagestan and Chechens. ALso, enough local fighters...
You simply fogot that just some month ago, we were world wrestling champion in Tehran.. ;)
because they already took 30% of your soil , so they don't want to risk what they took .... when you take back your territory , come and talk big ... killing soldiers in none aggressive situation is easy task ...
 
.
Retardo, do you know anything about the current situation? Where the balance are hugely in favour of Azerbaijan.

Few months ago an Armenian Mi-24 was shot down. There has been absolutely no slightest kind of "response" from your armo brothers.


This is the recent statement of Armenian defence ministry.

“If we respond to Azerbaijan following the ‘eye for an eye’ principle, large-scale military actions will start the next day, where we’ll have tens of thousands of losses,” Hovhannisyan said.

Escalation of Violence in Artsakh ‘Linked to Genocide Centennial’ | Asbarez Armenian News

Why don't you go and jerk over "Aghareb" you retard?

this one is my favorite :D

 
. .
Very simple. Idiot Aliev is in saudi as a proxy to Iran; He is wary of 1999 iranian jets flying over Baku. Birds of same flock tend to huddle together.
It is a clique from Naxcivan that is ruling Azerbaijan. If you are not part from that area, you dont get anywhere.
It is rather interesting to see him take a trip over to Saudi Arabia meanwhile squandering money on wanting to be a European by hosting european games, eurovision. Given the money coming in, average wage is around 100$-200$/month. Meanwhile, Aliev's dames have money in several millions/year for their grooming and plastic surgery.
Baku is filled with poverty and people being taken out of their older apartments and those are demolished for newer apartments which these poor people cannot even afford.
Just drive out of Baku and the reality comes to light.
 
.
Azerbijan will never forget what the Iranian did to them in the armenian-Azeri war, So i am not suprised. If No one noticed the next step is very simple to put pressure on Iran from KSA. k.S.A will be using the minority extentions to unsettle Iran, every country will have a role. Pakistan through it's extention of it's baluch population into Iran (It's already starting where dozen of Iranian soldiers were killed), Turks and Azerbijan through the Turkmen and Azeri in north and North west Iran, Ahwaz and other arab area's through the G.C.C (Arab sat tv these days are non stop talking about Iranian arab misery etc).

If you do a little research you will see that in the last 3 months KSA has met many high to medium level delegation from those countries, The idea or long term goal is to unsettle iran and keep them busy internally.

I have also heard but i can't confirm how reliable this is that KSA has told aliev the president of azeribijan that unification of the azeri turks is not off the table if matters resort to it. Behind the scene KSA is putting alot of work it is going to be interesting to see what the future would bring. But i can tell you the main objective for ksa long term strategic objective is to overthrow the Mullah rule in iran using internal strife inside iran.
 
.
Very simple. Idiot Aliev is in saudi as a proxy to Iran; He is wary of 1999 iranian jets flying over Baku. Birds of same flock tend to huddle together.
It is a clique from Naxcivan that is ruling Azerbaijan. If you are not part from that area, you dont get anywhere.
It is rather interesting to see him take a trip over to Saudi Arabia meanwhile squandering money on wanting to be a European by hosting european games, eurovision. Given the money coming in, average wage is around 100$-200$/month. Meanwhile, Aliev's dames have money in several millions/year for their grooming and plastic surgery.
Baku is filled with poverty and people being taken out of their older apartments and those are demolished for newer apartments which these poor people cannot even afford.
Just drive out of Baku and the reality comes to light.

Lol , what an idiot.
 
.
Lol , what an idiot.
same there to u.. a bigger fool who cannot see reality of massive unemployment, poverty, corruption, embezzlement by the leeches installed at the top and oppression at a massive scale believing the propaganda thrown out by AzTV and crony press. hey, continue to live in fool's paradise ignorant of reality. this is just one of the 'STANS' where old KGB stooges are still lurking around pushing their thumbs down against the masses.
Iran is correct, Azeraijan is a confused personality who is try to be European but is an asian. If it was not for the Soviets breakup, it would still be part of Iran and who knows it might be later on. There are more Azeri speakers in Iran than Azerbaijan.
In a grand scheme of things, a tiny player which will fall in a day if oppression is lifted and the falsified sham elections are done away with.
 
Last edited:
.
Iran & Azerbaijan will have very good relationship in the future. All this online banter between the two nations is idiotic.

Yesterday's news,

"First deputy speaker of Azerbaijan’s Parliament Ziyafat Asgarov has said official Baku always considered Tehran`s interests in its foreign policy. He met Iranian Minister of Cooperative, Labor and Social Welfare Ali Rabiei who is on a visit in Baku.

He hailed relations between the two countries. “Our countries are bound together by ties of national and moral values, shared traditions and cultures.”


"Mr Rabiei applauded Azerbaijan-Iran collaboration. He said there were good opportunities for expanding the bilateral economic ties. He also said that Iran`s Defence Minister would visit Baku soon. Mr Rabiei said that Iran has always supported Azerbaijani people, and was one of the first countries to recognize Azerbaijan`s independence. The Iranian Minister expressed regret over the fact that “the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute has not yet been resolved”. He expressed confidence that the problem would be solved in compliance with international law as soon as possible. “Iran will always make efforts towards finding a fair solution to the conflict,” Mr Rabiei added.

http://azertag.az/en/xeber/847563
 
.
Iran & Azerbaijan will have very good relationship in the future. All this online banter between the two nations is idiotic.

Yesterday's news,

"First deputy speaker of Azerbaijan’s Parliament Ziyafat Asgarov has said official Baku always considered Tehran`s interests in its foreign policy. He met Iranian Minister of Cooperative, Labor and Social Welfare Ali Rabiei who is on a visit in Baku.

He hailed relations between the two countries. “Our countries are bound together by ties of national and moral values, shared traditions and cultures.”


"Mr Rabiei applauded Azerbaijan-Iran collaboration. He said there were good opportunities for expanding the bilateral economic ties. He also said that Iran`s Defence Minister would visit Baku soon. Mr Rabiei said that Iran has always supported Azerbaijani people, and was one of the first countries to recognize Azerbaijan`s independence. The Iranian Minister expressed regret over the fact that “the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute has not yet been resolved”. He expressed confidence that the problem would be solved in compliance with international law as soon as possible. “Iran will always make efforts towards finding a fair solution to the conflict,” Mr Rabiei added.

http://azertag.az/en/xeber/847563
Agreed with possibility of a union.
 
.
That statement is a testimony to the new balance of power. You still don't want to understand?

Azerbaijan is in midst of military build up, with military expenditures increased to 5 billion (not far behind the super big great superpower Iran, with faaar less population on the other hand). This kind of argument doesn't even makes sense because Azerbaijan are not sitting idle. But like the queer you are, you are going to repeat the same thing.

I don't see Azerbaijan just attacking willy nilly. The country is now fully integrated in the world economy, it has many energy contracts and other trade ties. That in an of it's own will make unilateral military action a lot more difficult. I think the only solution is a political one, brokered perhaps by the UN or the region's powers. Anyway, I see the military buildup as part of that negotiation. Besides, sadly as with many things in the Muslim world, any war woudn't be one on one.

At the end, it's going to be a brokered solution, not war. And please refrain from foul mouthing Iran. No need for that. Thanks.

Azerbijan will never forget what the Iranian did to them in the armenian-Azeri war, So i am not suprised. If No one noticed the next step is very simple to put pressure on Iran from KSA. k.S.A will be using the minority extentions to unsettle Iran, every country will have a role. Pakistan through it's extention of it's baluch population into Iran (It's already starting where dozen of Iranian soldiers were killed), Turks and Azerbijan through the Turkmen and Azeri in north and North west Iran, Ahwaz and other arab area's through the G.C.C (Arab sat tv these days are non stop talking about Iranian arab misery etc).

If you do a little research you will see that in the last 3 months KSA has met many high to medium level delegation from those countries, The idea or long term goal is to unsettle iran and keep them busy internally.

I have also heard but i can't confirm how reliable this is that KSA has told aliev the president of azeribijan that unification of the azeri turks is not off the table if matters resort to it. Behind the scene KSA is putting alot of work it is going to be interesting to see what the future would bring. But i can tell you the main objective for ksa long term strategic objective is to overthrow the Mullah rule in iran using internal strife inside iran.

Dear friend. First of all, you're getting many things wrong here. Baluchis are killing BOTH sides, Pak and IR. It's not like they're stooges from Pakistan, they want independence from both.
Second, there are more Azeris living in Iran, than in Azerbaijan, more than twice actually. And none of them speak of any 'unification', that's just some wet dream. If anything, they'd be unified within Iran.
Thirdly, Iran can 'entice' the Shia minority in Bahrain and Saudi and the Houthis in Yemen 10 times quicker before any Iranian internal disorder. Know the facts.
And finally, we're just talking proxy wars in the region. PROXY. Nobody is even remotely talking about bringing down any of the big countries, which would destabilize the entire region and F energy supplies for decades. Time to grow up and read some books.

Besides, before too long, borders will become irrelevant anyway. Look at Europe. Traveling without visa, cross border investments etc. People need to enlighten themselves and understand this isn't the 1800s anymore. Nationalism is on the out.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom