What's new

Australia dumps Russia, embraces India for nuclear deal

Europa

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
911
Reaction score
-1
Country
Germany
Location
India
Shifty Australia dumps Russia, embraces India for nuclear deal — RT Op-Edge
australia-russia-india-uranium.si.jpg


Australia has just dumped Russia and embraced India in a uranium export deal that is seen as a shift in diplomacy.

Interestingly, Australia signed the nuclear deal with India at a time when it had just cancelled its uranium sales pact with Russia. Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott did not hold his punches vis-a-vis Russia when he went on record telling the Australian Broadcasting Corporation on 2 September:"Australia has no intention of selling uranium to a country which is so obviously in breach of international law as Russia currently is … If we are prepared to sell uranium to Russia, and we've been prepared to do that in the past, surely we ought to be prepared to provide uranium to India under suitable safeguards.”

Australia has been rather shifty in some of its major foreign policy decisions. Under pressure from China in 2007, Australia had withdrawn from the strategic quadrilateral comprising Japan, US, Australia and India. Now under pressure from the US-led Western community, Australia has cancelled its uranium exports to Russia.

Australia is already trying to block the participation of Russian President Vladimir Putin in the upcoming G20 meeting in Brisbane in November. The issue came up for a discussion at the NATO summit in Wales on 4-5 September, though the main talking points of the summit were developments in Ukraine, Iraq and Syria.

Because Australia by itself cannot decide on excluding any member from the Brisbane summit and because G20 has no rules on revoking membership and decides mainly by unanimity, Australia may try to cobble up “unanimity” of the rest of the G20 members to keep Russia out of the Brisbane summit.

Australia-India bonhomie
Australia is making a concerted effort to reach out to all the major powers to increase its strategic footprint wherever it matters most. No surprise then that Canberra is wooing India like never before.

Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott came to India on a state visit – the first state visit to India by a foreign leader since the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi took over on 26 May. Modi will be travelling to Australia to attend the G20 summit in Brisbane on 15-16 November where he will be having a bilateral meeting with his Australian counterpart. This will be first visit by an Indian Prime Minister to Australia in 28 years.

This is the first time the prime ministers of India and Australia have visited each other’s countries in a single year.

The high point of Abbott’s state visit to India has become the signing of the uranium export deal. Before embarking on his India visit, Abbott told his parliament on 3 September that he would sign a nuclear cooperation agreement with India, thus bringing closure to an important aspect of bilateral relations that the two sides had been negotiating for two years, and have had five rounds of discussions on this so far.

So now Japan is the only major power in the world with which India has yet to sign an agreement on cooperation in the civilian nuclear field. The done deal with Australia will inevitably exert pressure on Japan. The much-awaited India-Japan nuclear deal could not be signed during Modi’s just-concluded visit to Japan as apparently Tokyo still needs more time and space to ink this crucial agreement with India.

In 2007, under pressure from China, Australia had unilaterally killed the strategic quadrilateral. Now, under pressure from the US, it has cancelled its uranium deal with Russia. I asked Sanjay Bhattacharya, joint secretary (South) in the Ministry of External Affairs, about Australia’s shifty diplomacy and whether Australia will have some protective measures with regard to its nuclear deal with India.

“I think we’d recognize that there is a dynamic in the Asia-Pacific region and we recognize Australia as an emerging player in this area. We’ve, therefore, established strategic partnership with Australia in 2009. We wish to build to our relations further with Australia, as we do with many other countries. So we will continue to build and strengthen our partnership with Australia,” Bhattacharya said.

Russia, India need to take their strategic partnership on global plane
It is unlikely that Australia’s unilateral cancellation of uranium export to Russia came up for discussion when Abbott held talks with his Indian colleagues.

But if India and Russia are to have a meaningful strategic partnership, it should encompass the whole globe. Both friends should take up with third countries those issues affect them badly. But then such things normally do not take place in international diplomacy unless the two sides concerned make a conscious policy decision.

Perhaps it is time for the two traditional friends India and Russia to think out of the box and take up each other’s interests with third nations. It will be only then that the two friends will have a true strategic partnership on the global plane.

-----------------------------------------------------

ever wonder what the third country could be. the name starts with the alphabet "c" ;)
 
The Russia-China axis and its threat to West | Fox News

this axis will collapse if war breaks out between india and china because russia will support india against china. as a result, china and russia will become each other's enemies.

in all probability, this may happen very soon. india is the key to russia-china axis.
If India will be on the side of the West in the fight of all nations against worldwide hegemony of "exceptional" nation, it can not be an ally and even a friend of Russia. But if India would be on the side of Russia and China, in the new world, in the future it will become one of the poles of power, remains friend and partner in all endeavors.
 
If India will be on the side of the West in the fight of all nations against worldwide hegemony of "exceptional" nation, it can not be an ally and even a friend of Russia. But if India would be on the side of Russia and China, in the new world, in the future it will become one of the poles of power, remains friend and partner in all endeavors.

agreed but who knows, west may exploit this sensitivity.
 
If India will be on the side of the West in the fight of all nations against worldwide hegemony of "exceptional" nation, it can not be an ally and even a friend of Russia. But if India would be on the side of Russia and China, in the new world, in the future it will become one of the poles of power, remains friend and partner in all endeavors.
Don't want interve but sir but you cannot jugde pact of friendship on the basis of one deal .look at Chinese they involved in Bussines with Western powers much larger what india has.chinese market have all the trade access of western nations.so same case india trade ties with Western powers does not certify it's policies.
 
The Russia-China axis and its threat to West | Fox News

this axis will collapse if war breaks out between india and china because russia will support india against china. as a result, china and russia will become each other's enemies.

in all probability, this may happen very soon. india is the key to russia-china axis.
It is just your prediction that Russia supports China. Russia will try to be neutral and will at the most try to mediate between the two. This is not my prediction. It's common sense.
 
It is just your prediction that Russia supports China. Russia will try to be neutral and will at the most try to mediate between the two. This is not my prediction. It's common sense.

when, where did i say it?
 
Don't want interve but sir but you cannot jugde pact of friendship on the basis of one deal .look at Chinese they involved in Bussines with Western powers much larger what india has.chinese market have all the trade access of western nations.so same case india trade ties with Western powers does not certify it's policies.
I did not mean this deal. Trade is a normal thing. I'm talking about global alliances, in one of which the United States tyrann and their servants, and in the other - all eagering to the free world nations.
 
I did not mean this deal. Trade is a normal thing. I'm talking about global alliances, in one of which the United States tyrann and their servants, and in the other - all eagering to the free world nations.
Indian policy for Russia is always clear.Our foreign minister bluntly thrashed John Kerry when he asked us about putting sanctions Russia.i don't think it ever gonna change under new GOI which is hardiners.The only hindrance which this new world order facing is indo-chinese relationship which always has up-downs.Hope it's will solve in future.
 
Sorry my mistake. It's India in place of China.

oh come on, i didn't say that too. i tried to connect brahma's opinion piece to the fox news which mentioned a russia-china axis. now, use your common sense again, russia is a traditional friend of india but a mere trading partner with china, now what would you do if you want to sabotage the axis? no matter what others say, russia is obliged to help india if you push india and china to a confrontation and thereby you can easily split china from russia. all you need to do is to play double cross.
 
oh come on, i didn't say that too. i tried to connect brahma's opinion piece to the fox news which mentioned a russia-china axis. now, use your common sense again, russia is a traditional friend of india but a mere trading partner with china, now what would you do if you want to sabotage the axis? no matter what others say, russia is obliged to help india if you push india and china to a confrontation and thereby you can easily split china from russia. all you need to do is to play double cross.
Misconception brother.
Why would Russia support India over China. As I said, it stays neutral. If it is any other country, Russsia may support India. Russia needs China to counter the west. India is not as anti west as China.Moreover, on any serious issue, in order to veto any move, India is helpless. Sure Russia would be alarmed as it's major ally would suffer..so, at the most Russia will try to solve/mediate between India and China.
 
Misconception brother.
Why would Russia support India over China. As I said, it stays neutral. If it is any other country, Russsia may support India. Russia needs China to counter the west. India is not as anti west as China.Moreover, on any serious issue, in order to veto any move, India is helpless. Sure Russia would be alarmed as it's major ally would suffer..so, at the most Russia will try to solve/mediate between India and China.

how can india remain pro-west and pro-russia at a time? can anyone sit on two different boats at a time? what will happen when two boats move apart?
 
how can india remain pro-west and pro-russia at a time? can anyone sit on two different boats at a time? what will happen when two boats move apart?
That has been the trademark of Indian diplomacy till now. I'm starting to get a feeling that time is nearing when India needs to select a camp and stay with it. But till the NAM is the way to go.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom