What's new

Assad is winning get over it Haters

Assad is indeed doing it!!
I sincerely hope that this phase of civil war comes to an end as soon as possible and peace prevails in Syria, enough damage already.
Assad should look forward to rebuild his country and after the conditions are stable, he should take retirement and make way for a new government to take the charge.

Have you seen any dictator giving up he's power? There won't be any democracy in Syria until Assad family steps down and honest elections will be held.
 
Better than suicide bombers actually. This is the extreme version of Shi'ites, the extreme version of Sunnis is worse. beheadings + suicide bombers. They can use that sword as much as they want as long as they don't harm others unlike the suicide bombers.

Truth whether people like it or not.
Wahabi is more obtuse to understand these things.
 
Better than suicide bombers actually. This is the extreme version of Shi'ites, the extreme version of Sunnis is worse. beheadings + suicide bombers. They can use that sword as much as they want as long as they don't harm others unlike the suicide bombers.

Truth whether people like it or not.

Extreme version of Shias or extreme version of Sunnis.

They're both garbage and utter retards.
 
Extreme version of Shias or extreme version of Sunnis.

They're both garbage and utter retards.

Yes both retards that should be banned from earth. But the Sunni version of the extreme is more destructive to other people physically. Not that @BATMAN would understand, that guy probably can't wait to behead some filthy Majoos!
 
Yes both retards that should be banned from earth. But the Sunni version of the extreme is more destructive to other people physically. Not that @BATMAN would understand, that guy probably can't wait to behead some filthy Majoos!

when you get a reply you get personal.... this shows your guilt.
Still, thank lord so far no shia has sent me emails cursing some historical figures of Islam, which i used to receive in past!
Coming to the beheaders operating in Pakistan, sent by India and Iran via Afghanistan..... and death squads in Iraq.... only thing common to all of them is mad regime of Iran and it was US who conquered those states and install shia regimes, just before all the horrible things being take place.
Now you are here celebrating similar happenings in Syria... shame on such mentality, but no surprise, below is a picture of some influential beheaders of Pakistan and we are actually victim, beheaders in Pakistan were protected by law introduced by Asif Ali Zardari regime, now they are free to do, what ever they wish.
It also proves, how much influence those so called Sunnis ave in Pakistan.

0.jpg


Batman, you're a hero, you're stronger than Assad, go and kill him, don't forget to take spiderman with you.

You should be ashamed after killing non kids of Syria, i see Iran revolution guards and Hizbullah the murderers and animals.
I pray Allah give Syrian Muslims help to defeat this internationally sponsored thug named Asad.

Extreme version of Shias or extreme version of Sunnis.

They're both garbage and utter retards.

This is what i believe... and i categorize Asad worst form of it.
 
Last edited:
Sunnis is worse. beheadings + suicide bombers
i have no sect... and beheaders and suicide bombers are jahils and are proxies of India and Iran operating out of Afghanistan.
 
Have you seen any dictator giving up he's power? There won't be any democracy in Syria until Assad family steps down and honest elections will be held.

Asad is a shia and he is killing non shia,... in his belief he is taking revenge of karbala and this is why hizbulla and Iranians are fighting from his side and celebrating there heinous acts.
Same, Iranians are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan and have done in past in Iran.
Their hate knows know boundaries, and killings in Syria should be enough to open the eyes of Muslims.
We all know Iran also holds the remote control of northern alliance currently ruling Afghanistan, and the worst known haters of Pakistan and its people and the basis of their partnership with India is this common hate against Pakistani people.
 
I'm not sure about my self but do you know this kid:
blood.jpg

A shia never suicide him/herself and kill other muslims.

Asad is a shia and he is killing non shia,... in his belief he is taking revenge of karbala and this is why hizbulla and Iranians are fighting from his side and celebrating there heinous acts.
Same, Iranians are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan and have done in past in Iran.
Their hate knows know boundaries, and killings in Syria should be enough to open the eyes of Muslims.
We all know Iran also holds the remote control of northern alliance currently ruling Afghanistan, and the worst known haters of Pakistan and its people and the basis of their partnership with India is this common hate against Pakistani people.

I think you are 19 years old boy
 
A shia never suicide him/herself and kill other muslims.
If i ignore Iran's post revolution history, than i cannot ignore what you did and doing in Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Syria.
If you do not know, suicide bombers are always drugged kids by evils working out of Afghanistan.
Your rituals of instilling hate and pain in the minds of your kids against differently labeled Muslims is not for nothing.
I have posted a picture, of beheaders of kids... in my post above, who are all shia and they have lot of political influence.
The whole episode was clearly engineered..... every thing was timely and well prepared.

A shia never suicide him/herself and kill other muslims.
I think you are 19 years old boy

I would be 40, if i would have celebrated with you in this thread!
 
We all know Iran also holds the remote control of northern alliance currently ruling Afghanistan, and the worst known haters of Pakistan and its people and the basis of their partnership with India is this common hate against Pakistani people.
This organization was created to counter the Taliban. If they dislike Pakistan it's obvious why... I see similarities with Syrian rebels hating Iran for our support of the government.
 
This organization was created to counter the Taliban. If they dislike Pakistan it's obvious why... I see similarities with Syrian rebels hating Iran for our support of the government.

It was an alliance of criminals, drug lords and murderers, they hated and butchered there own pashtoons and again the beef was sect. and Iranian support to this minority fanatics.
Afghan Massacre: The Convoy of Death - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why would they hate us for the reason of Taliban, which was there own people but they were certainly assisted by Indians and Iranians and now we have fake Taliban only killing Pakistanis.
 
Bashar al-Assad and his leadership are there to stay. It did not really need one of his closest allies and saviours, the Lebanese Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah, to say it.

It is now the working assumption of most observers and analysts, Western diplomats who have toiled to dislodge him, and even some of the more realistic elements among the Syrian opposition.

The reason is simple.

Unless some of the elements in the equation change radically - and there is no sign of that happening in the near future - there is no foreseeable set of circumstances that would exert sufficient pressure on Mr Assad to stand down, or the regime to negotiate its own demise.

Equally, military victory by the fractious and feuding rebel groups is now a distant dream. Some of their regional backers may still want it, but the Western powers which pull many of the strings behind the scenes never did anyway.

A negotiated settlement is just as remote.

The Geneva talks, which began in January and nosedived in February, are dead in the water.

Geo-political tensions
In the current configuration, the only feasible settlement would require the opposition and their backers to accept that Bashar al-Assad and his power circle remain in place with some cosmetic reforms, something the rebels cannot do without negating their own raison d'etre.

Anything else would require strong external pressures on the regime to make serious concessions, less likely now than ever because of the breakdown in entente between Washington and Moscow over Ukraine.

That crisis has given the Russian President Vladimir Putin strong motivation to assert himself against the Americans over Syria rather than go along with them.

The pressures on Mr Assad are now so light that he is preparing to have himself re-elected for another full seven-year term, rather than opting for a compromise two-year extension, an idea kicked around a few months ago when diplomacy was active.

At the weekend, he said the crisis was turning around, because of advances scored by the army as well as "national reconciliations", a reference to the local truces which have partly pacified some of the Damascus suburbs after rebel-held areas had been blockaded to choking point.

But none of this means that outright military victory is within sight for the government either.

War of attrition
The most likely prognosis, as Hassan Nasrallah said, is for a prolonged war of attrition if the rebels refuse to come to terms with the government, as is likely.

For the moment, the conflict has settled into a kind of unstable stalemate, with the balance tilted somewhat in the regime's favour thanks to its unchecked use of its air power, a generous flow of military supplies from Russia, and much help from Iran and allied Shia fighters from Lebanon and Iraq.

President Assad himself, according to a visiting Russian official, predicted that "the active phase of military action" would be finished this year, and that it would then be a question of "fighting terrorists and suicide bombers".

That may be tinged with wishful thinking. But the government has been steadily consolidating its control around Damascus and core areas in western and central Syria, despite rebel penetrations in the far north, control in the east, and much fighting in the south.

"If present trends continue - and there really is little to suggest they will not - then the regime will be in a dominant position and in effective control of a critical mass of the country by the end of 2015, if not sooner," wrote analyst Yezid Sayigh of the Carnegie Endowment.

So it may not be fanciful to imagine a future where resistance to President Assad is reduced to outlying areas such as the far-flung eastern marches where the extreme militants of ISIS - the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (also known as ISIL) - have been consolidating their presence, which straddles the Iraqi border.

It is a pattern already set by Iraq, with ISIS, Sunni disaffection and Iranian support for the central government, as common factors.

Fractured opposition
It is a startling turnaround. Many observers - including this one - who barely 16 months ago believed the collapse of the regime under rebel pressure was imminent, have had to eat their words.

Will we be doing the same again 16 months from now?

It seems unlikely, on current form.

President Assad's backers - principally Russia and Iran and its allies - proved far more solid, consistent and forthcoming than the motley crew of Western and regional powers supporting the opposition and the rebels on the ground. That will not change.

The regime itself and its armed forces remained solid and cohesive, in contrast to the endemic bickering afflicting the never very credible opposition leadership in exile and the chaotic free-for-all prevailing among a myriad of rival rebel groups on the ground, with Islamic radicals increasingly to the fore.

Theoretically that could all be turned around, but it would take a radical reversal of everything that has happened over the past three years.

The opposition political leadership would have to unite and become credibly representative of the real forces inside the country. A centralised and authoritative military structure would have to be established, unifying, commanding and supplying rebel forces on the ground.

Radical groups linked to al-Qaeda would have to be isolated and suppressed. The Western powers, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other opposition supporters would all have to be pursuing the same coherent agenda, not just their own.

At the moment, that prescription looks like pie in the sky.

Western reticence
But in the absence of those conditions, it is hard to imagine the Americans and others giving the green light for a serious infusion of the kind of quality weapons - such as MANPAD anti-aircraft missiles and much more - that the rebels need if they are to stand a chance of tilting the balance back in their favour.

For now, there is no sign of such unity of purpose. Increasingly, the Western powers seem to view the Syrian crisis through the optic of counter-terrorism, haunted by the fear that quality weapons will fall into the hands of militant jihadists, and that hundreds of trained, battle-hardened and indoctrinated Islamist radicals from their own nations will head home with evil purpose.

It is not just a question of ISIS, which has alienated other rebel groups by its extreme behaviour and is seen by many as manipulated by the regime, but also factions such as the official al-Qaeda franchise, the Nusra Front, which is much more deeply embedded in the core of rebel activity, where many Islamist groups predominate.

So the best bet is that the Americans and their allies will continue to ration cannily their support to the armed rebels, giving them enough to keep afloat and prevent a collapse, but not to turn the tide decisively against the regime.

The rebels' fate is perilously hostage to the vacillations of Western policies and the vagaries of regional politics, such as the current row between Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

Their position could be severely undercut in the event of, for example, a rapprochement between Iran and the Saudis, which is being explored.

Price to pay

All of this does not mean that President Assad is there to stay forever.

He may be confident that the worst of the storm has passed. But it is not yet over, and the damage it has wrought will transform the country. The clock cannot be turned back.

Once the heat is off, there may be a reckoning from elements currently loyal to the leadership who have paid a high price for its brutal blunders.

There has also been a fragmentation and devolution of power on the ground in loyalist areas, which may make it hard for Damascus to reassert itself in the old manner.

Provided the overall strategic balance remains undisturbed, the key outside allies that have sustained the regime, notably Russia and Iran, may also - as they have often said - prove not to be wedded to the person of Bashar al-Assad once the pressure is off.

"We aren't seeking to have Bashar al-Assad remain president for life," Iran's deputy Foreign Minister Amir Abdollahian said recently.

"But we do not subscribe to the idea of using extremist forces and terrorism to topple Assad and the Syrian government."

But all that may lie in the future. For the moment, Mr Assad and his entourage may be excused for feeling that they can breathe easy.

BBC News - Analysis: Why Assad can have confidence in his survival


Thank you Syria for ridding the world of a large amount of scum from the face of the earth - if anything India should be thankful too and send support, armaments and funds to the Syrian regime for its sterling job. @Syrian Lion
The Syrian people and the Syrian army is sacrificing themselves to clean this earth from the terrorists supported by GCC terrorists... now some people are saying the economy is dead, is it true as of now, but when this war is over, we will rebuild easily, the main important thing now is getting rid of those terrorists...

Assad is camping on Tartus naval base that is under Russia protection, ready to evacuate anytime.



Nope, MBC group belongs to Waleed Al Ibrahim. Al-Saud have got nothing to do with it.

hahaha, here is Alasad celebrating Easter in Malulola north of Damascus... unless Alasad moved Malaula to Tartus or Russia :rofl:
10269452_225284581002054_782519402570596591_n.jpg
 
That's a massacre of captured fighters, not civilians.
Captured fighters, after carpet bombing....? do you know what sort of weapons are used to kill fighters inside caves? dude there was no resistance and fighter is one who have sustained supply lines.
Kids were suffocated in containers, and remaining were shot dead ... and later new method was invented.... to take organs out of living pashtoons and ship to India and abroad and this continued till long time.

The reason for hate in the hearts of northern alliance is nothing but religion! and how cruel there religion can be, they have shown a glimpse of it!

400 Taliban supporters massacred in Kandahar: Prisoners die in containers

Syrian army is sacrificing themselves to clean this earth from the terrorists supported by GCC
There is no Syrian army, its Iranian revolution guards and Hizbulla.
As far i remember, war was started by Assad not GCC and influx of refugees and there horrible stories of survival, triggered lot of anger among Arabs.
 
Last edited:

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom