beijingwalker
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2011
- Messages
- 65,195
- Reaction score
- -55
- Country
- Location
If US really means what they claimed to defend Taiwan, why they abandoned Taiwan in the first place in 1979?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, Just like Russia took over Ukraine in 3 days.
Do not confuse Ukraine with the situation in Taiwan and do not mistake China with Russia. Apples and oranges, I just hope for regional and global stability and peace that sense prevails. I hold Nancy Pelosi responsible for this, the people who will ultimately suffer will be the ordinary people of Taiwan because of her selfish little jaunt.Yes, Just like Russia took over Ukraine in 3 days.
Taiwan TV News: Massive protests broke out in Taiwan against Pelosi's Taiwan vistDo not confuse Ukraine with the situation in Taiwan and do not mistake China with Russia. Apples and oranges, I just hope for regional and global stability and peace that sense prevails. I hold Nancy Pelosi responsible for this, the people who will ultimately suffer will be the ordinary people of Taiwan because of her selfish little jaunt.
You will like this one from yesterday:Taiwan TV News: Massive protests broke out in Taiwan against Pelosi's Taiwan vist
I think that China can do a lot. The question is -Will it do?So. do you believe that China will not use force to recover Taiwan?
So you think As the P5 and G2 of the world, will China do nothing?
So you think the purpose of China is only to prevent Pelosi go to Taiwan. Not to reclaim Taiwan?
Why need to take the main island? Taking kinmen will be a good warning and bring the ball back to the western party. Didn't the western and Taiwan greepan party brah about western backing them up and help them defend Taiwan if war started?As well the Matsu Islands, it would be assumed. But, just like the taking of Crimea, it would change the dynamic in the area. More likely, China would have to take all the islands and the main island of Taiwan all at once, and that would be the full scale Taiwan operation.
China is building up the PLAN marines. An active force of over 500,000 would probably be needed to give a 3:1 numerical advantage, to intitally establish a beachhead on Taiwan. Perhaps a further 2-3 million PLA army troops maybe needed to complete the reunification and initially Garrison Taiwan to hold it, considering the further 1.65 Million potential Taiwanese reserves. At the very least these troops would be needed to maintain china’s defense at it borders with other countries, such as India, which PLA documents suggest will try to take advantage of the situation to try to make incision in the Himalayas and possible support Tibetan separatists.
Nobody talks about killing Taiwanese. Taking kinmen will be the least. If not, engage 2 F-16V and shot them down will be good enough.If we destroy Taiwan, we will kill too many Taiwanese. These Taiwanese will hate us for a long time. The USA will continue to incite rebellion in Taiwan and use the lives of Taiwanese people to consume our national strength.
Taiwanese are also Han people, so we don't need to do this.
We should clearly realize that our goal should be the USA. As long as our economic, political and military capabilities can suppress the United States, we can completely and peacefully recover Taiwan. If we cannot suppress the USA, even if we take back Taiwan, it will only take back a burden.
Now the God of time is standing by us, and we become stronger every day, and the USA becomes weaker every day. We don't need to worry too much.
So we should now launch an economic war against the USA, not against Taiwan.
If US really means what they claimed to defend Taiwan, why they abandoned Taiwan in the first place in 1979?If US was not standing with Taiwan then Xi would have taken them over long back. US is obviously not a saint but neither is Xi.
US has stoked the fire obviously to gain an edge in this narrative. It has called a bluff to China which had issued warning of grave consequences if Pelosi visits Taiwan.
When one issues a threat of grave consequences then it means immediate actions and not actions few years down the line.
If Xi wants to retaliate after an year then he shouldn’t have issued a threat.
Let’s see what grave actions are taken. If none then China issuing threats would indeed become a joke.
If the Taiwan Army didn't fire first (of course, they certainly wouldn't do such a stupid thing), we wouldn't have to shoot down the Taiwan fighter.Why need to take the main island? Taking kinmen will be a good warning and bring the ball back to the western party. Didn't the western and Taiwan greepan party brah about western backing them up and help them defend Taiwan if war started?
Plus Biden just talk only. You think he will commit full forces to engage PLA for Taiwan? He will immediately call the stupid woman in Taiwan and lash her up. Asking not to further agitated the situation. As usual the western media will find whatever excuse to claim a victory for themselves despite failing the promise to defend Taiwan in case of a PLA attack.
Nobody talks about killing Taiwanese. Taking kinmen will be the least. If not, engage 2 F-16V and shot them down will be good enough.
Threats do not necessarily refer to military threats.If US was not standing with Taiwan then Xi would have taken them over long back. US is obviously not a saint but neither is Xi.
US has stoked the fire obviously to gain an edge in this narrative. It has called a bluff to China which had issued warning of grave consequences if Pelosi visits Taiwan.
When one issues a threat of grave consequences then it means immediate actions and not actions few years down the line.
If Xi wants to retaliate after an year then he shouldn’t have issued a threat.
Let’s see what grave actions are taken. If none then China issuing threats would indeed become a joke.
You think ROCAF wouldn't open fired on Chinese fighter jet if J-16 or J-10C decide to pass straight to Taipei airspace?If the Taiwan Army didn't fire first (of course, they certainly wouldn't do such a stupid thing), we wouldn't have to shoot down the Taiwan fighter.
We should take this opportunity to seize the right of flight in Taiwan's airspace and the right of navigation in its territorial waters. This will further disrupt the morale and organizational capacity of the Taiwan army.
If they fire, then we can shoot them down and destroy ancillary facilities, and even expand to warships and headquarters. Such a war limited to the destruction of military assets will not cause geopolitical problems.You think ROCAF wouldn't open fired on Chinese fighter jet if J-16 or J-10C decide to pass straight to Taipei airspace?
Why "invasion"? Which country denies that Taiwan is a province of China?
I remember when Ms Pelosi visited Taiwan. The U.S. government once again confirmed that it "abides by the one China principle". So. China used force to recover Taiwan. Why is it considered an "invasion"?
Taiwan TV News: Massive protests broke out in Taiwan against Pelosi's Taiwan vist