WAJsal
SENIOR MODERATOR
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2014
- Messages
- 7,879
- Reaction score
- 212
- Country
- Location
First line of my post:Sir, for the second time, you fail to explain what is it that you find insulting in my posts that you quote. You have you opinion and I have mine. My views, as stated above, have plenty to support them.
I found your definition of Pakistan very insulting.
Let me try to put it in simpler words...
"A Project by Army administered by Army so whats the problem?"
reply:
"The very definition of Pakistan."
So Pakistan was a project of the Army, or such forces? Our founding Fathers gave a lot of sacrifices for it, it was no project.
Your post suggested what exactly? quite clear you meant to say 'Pakistan was a project of the Army', also add 'administrated by the army' too. Or please prove me wrong. What exactly did you post mean?
Heading towards a dead end. It's best to accept one's mistakes at times.
You have the support of the majority, you are in power. This things only reflect the incompetence of civilian governments. If factions within the army is involved in such activity, what action has the federal government taken against them? or can it even take any action against them? By using the parliament the government can easily bring the army under it's rule.It also means that the civilian government has been handicapped by using tactics.
PS: one can even try and be Amir al-Mu'minin if he is in power.
The government has the support of the majority, only reason why it will never look to stand up to the establishment is because it wishes to complete it's tenure. It doesn't give a crap about democracy, or the system to be more exact.
So Pakistan is not under Democratic rule? if there are forces working to derail the system what measures have the government taken against these forces? How are they not letting democracy run? Whose responsibility is it to run democracy? Just need to ask yourself, no need to answer these questions.If you are not going to let democracy run, how can you evolve with time ?
All in all establishment working against you only reflects the incompetence of federal government. A powerful government would never let the Army dictate anything.
What is democratic about PPP and PMLN? I would like to use the term 'civilian dictators' here. I can't wait for Princess Maryam to take over her father. Master Bilawal has already done that. Pardon me please, i love these moments.In two successive democratic transitions, if you can't see the difference in governance between PPP and PML-N, there is seriously something wrong with you, maybe its just your personal ego.
That only highlights the incompetence of the federal government. A strong government will always keep it's opposition in check, if it can't it simply shows the governments incompetence. Lets take current situation for example, how hard is to listen to the opposition? why can't the opposition be consulted regarding the TOR's of the commission. Or even when the Panama Papers were leaked out, the government gave the opportunity to the opposition.A weak government results because of hostile, immature opposition.
Thank you for further highlighting the incompetence of civilian government. Pray do tell whose job is it exactly to demolish this political wing? Whose job is it to keep the army in check? Current government doesn't care and will continue to be dictated looking to finish it's tenure.No democracy can work until ISI's political cell is demolished for good. There is always a reason for General Pasha's name to come up and a guy like TUQ coming of out the blue and spending millions in his useless campaign is no secret.
And if i listen to your opinion and you listen to mine and we continue to have a sane argument, like all arguments it will reach to it's end...it's pretty democratic.Pakistanis always have something to say. If you get dictated, you are a looser. But if you don't let anyone dictate you, you become a dictator and undemocratic : )
The problem with Nawaz is that he is too scared to make a stand, lets face it.