What's new

Army sets out to seek 140 ultra-light Howitzer guns

Contrarian

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Oct 23, 2006
Messages
11,571
Reaction score
4
Army sets out to seek 140 ultra-light Howitzer guns

January 14, 2008 18:33 IST

Setting in motion the delayed Rs 10,000 crore artillery modernisation programme, the Army on Monday invited proposals for procurement of 140 ultra-light Howitzer guns.

This was announced by Army Chief General Deepak Kapoor during an interaction with the media on the eve of the 60th Army Day.

"As I am interacting with you right now, the RFP (Request for proposal) for procurement of the Ultra-Light Howitzer guns has been issued," Gen Kapoor said, while admitting delays in the modernisation of the artillery programme.

There has been no fresh induction of artillery guns since the infamous Rs 1,437-crore Bofors deal, under which 410 155mm 39-calibre field Howitzers were bought in 1986.

Now taking the issue at a war footing, the Army plans to issue fresh global tenders for procurement of the 155mm 52-calibre guns 'shortly' and for 155 advanced gun in 'a month or so,' the army chief said.

Armies in some of the developed countries have been giving preference to the ultra-light Howitzers since it can be transported to battle-zone by air, much faster than the conventional heavy artillery guns.

In 2001, India floated a global tender for acquisition of 400 towed 155mm 52-calibre artillery guns, valued upwards of $1.5 billion. This process was to be followed by licensed production in India.

But earlier this year, it was scrapped after an unprecedented four rounds of trials -- 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2006 -- during which the Bofors gun (now owned by BAe Systems) performed better than the guns of Israeli firm Soltam and the now-blacklisted South African Denel company.

While the arms market was full of speculation that the UPA government developed cold feet due to the Bofors name associated with the BAe Systems, the Army maintained that none of the guns could meet all the laid-down general staff qualitative requirements.

To a question as to whether the Army had accepted or rejected the anti-aircraft Akash Missile, Gen Kapoor said the army has not attended any trial of the missile system so far.

"We have certain requirements and aspects. We would like them to be met before we take any decision," the Army Chief said.

Referring to land attack super-sonic cruise missile BrahMos, multi-barrel rocket system Pinaka and Russian-made Smerch's induction into the army, Gen Kapoor said that everything was going as per schedule.

"As far as Smerch was concerned, some of the system had been inducted from Russia [Images] while other was in the pipeline and would be coming soon," he said.

To a question about the T-90 tanks, Gen Kapoor said the government had in principle agreed for induction of 347 more such tanks in the Army and the process would be completed soon.

When asked about the delay in Transfer of Technology from Russia on T-90 tanks which was pushing the deadline of its indigenous production, Gen Kapoor said ToT is a 'complex process.'

Sometimes, the transferor of technology is not able to put it clearly and sometimes the receiver of technology does not understand it properly.

"The process of ToT has been delayed but it will happen and will be completed," Gen Kapoor added.

Army sets out to seek 140 Howitzer guns
 
.
A quick question comes in my mind. If India manufacture anything for it's Armed Forces? As everytime I hear that India is going to import such and such thing for it's Army, Navy or Air Force or it's a joint venture with some other country.
 
.
A quick question comes in my mind. If India manufacture anything for it's Armed Forces? As everytime I hear that India is going to import such and such thing for it's Army, Navy or Air Force or it's a joint venture with some other country.

This is because India doesn't want to make the financial commitment for complete development. This is for good reason. As of right now the whole Indian military complex establishment is set up very poorly, making it a bad investment for the government itself. If it's a matter of license producing modified vintage technology etc it's ok. But for the state of the art hardware the best bet is to co-develop it with someone else by putting up only part of the cost.

Now if the entire business was turned over to the private sector with the government agencies only playing watchdog, as in the American model, then maybe things would be different. The Indian private sector I admit has been very impressive of late and certainly has access to the necessary skilled manpower unlike the governmental agencies. But as the current structure stands, foreign ventures are the best solution. Here's another post I made a while back on the same issue.
 
. . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom