What's new

anti-Iran and anti-US rallies in Iraq

. . .
Iran was moving along under Sadaam’s dictatorship. Now it has unfortunately become a battlefront for proxy sectarian conflicts. I wonder if President Bush sleeps well at night knowing what his decision to invade Iraq has accomplished.
 
. . . .
That's why we need the return of the old policy and invade others, allahu akbar
saddam tried invading iran. iraq was on the offensive for only 2 years compared to iran trying to liberate karbala (in their own words) for the remainder of the 6 years

You know a policy is wrong when you have 2 global powers and every regional power back you up but it still falls flat...
 
.
saddam tried invading iran. iraq was on the offensive for only 2 years compared to iran trying to liberate karbala (in their own words) for the remainder of the 6 years

You know a policy is wrong when you have 2 global powers and every regional power back you up but it still falls flat...

Iran accepted the ceasefire in 1988 when Iraq started gaining the edge, took back al Faw peninsula and advanced into Iran. By 1988 Iran's military was very broken whilst Iraq's was massive from all the foreign funding. Saddam decided to put a halt to it whilst he could have continued and captured parts of Iran.

Khomeini didn't accept the ceasefire in 1982 when he held the upper hand, that retard could have prevented 6 years of war. Our Saddam was also a major idiot to start with, he should have attacked Syria instead of Kuwait.
 
.
Our Saddam was also a major idiot to start with, he should have attacked Syria instead of Kuwait.

Yeah I think picking fights with other arab-majority countries is a perfect means to accelerate the noble endeavor of arabization!! Man...if only Saddam were smart enough to see it all for himself!!
 
.
Yeah I think picking fights with other arab-majority countries is a perfect means to accelerate the noble endeavor of arabization!! Man...if only Saddam were smart enough to see it all for himself!!

Other Arab states that misbehave or are ruled by faulty leaders should be punished as well, but today.. the biggest punishment should be on Iraq's leaders

The whole 'Arabization' campaign I speak of is to be limited within the Arab world, we don't need to do it to foreigners. Our own Arabs have failed Arabism.
 
.
May they succeed in Removing all foreign forces and proxy Militias from their Country. Its about time for Iraqis to take back control of their country and rule it on their own term.

But as the situation looks like for the past many months and now they would be eventually crushed unless they can get Iraqi Military on their side which as compromised as it is almost impossible.
 
Last edited:
.
May they succeed in Removing all foreign forces and proxy Militias from their Country. Its about time for Iraqi to take back control of their country and rule it on their own term.

But as the situation looks like for the past many months and now they would be eventually crushed unless they can get Iraqi Military on their side which knowing how much compromised it is to foreign elements its almost definitely not going to happen.

Iraqi military and ISOF aren't compromised, but the PMU counters them on the political level so they balance on another. Neither side can gain the upper hand without escalation for a power struggle.
 
.
Iran accepted the ceasefire in 1988 when Iraq started gaining the edge, took back al Faw peninsula and advanced into Iran. By 1988 Iran's military was very broken whilst Iraq's was massive from all the foreign funding. Saddam decided to put a halt to it whilst he could have continued and captured parts of Iran.

Khomeini didn't accept the ceasefire in 1982 when he held the upper hand, that retard could have prevented 6 years of war. Our Saddam was also a major idiot to start with, he should have attacked Syria instead of Kuwait.
You always claim saddam had upper hand but actually if it wasn't saudis billions support and yankees full support even direct war against Iran, Iran had completely conquered Iraq. Even though we were completely sanctioned and it was just two years passed from Islamic revolution and we had no generals and army.
 
.
You always claim saddam had upper hand but actually if it wasn't saudis billions support and yankees full support even direct war against Iran, Iran had conquered entire Iraq long ago even though we were completely sanctioned and it was just two years passed from Islamic revolution and we had no generals and army.

That's because the US equipped Iran's military in the 70's with great weaponry (F-14's, AH-1 etc.) to counter the USSR as Iran was a major US ally. Iraq had to catch up to reach Iran's military level, that's why the Arabs supported Iraq. That aside, Iran is bigger, has a far larger population and Iraq is by majority Shi'a (weak point as IRI could influence them).
 
.
Back
Top Bottom